Talk:SMS Sperber

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Military history: Maritime / European / German

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force European military history task force German military history task force

Germany Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Sperber/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 23:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi! I'll take this article for review, and should have my full comments up by later tonight. Dana boomer (talk) 23:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   • I'm sure you've checked the IP addition from April 5 to make sure everything is solid there?

   • Yeah, it's the standard note explaining SMS and the translation of the ship's name.

   • Lead, "but was thereafter used as a target ship until 1918. She was thereafter sold" - close repetition of "thereafter".

   • Changed the second one to "later"

   • Second deployment abroad, "presence was unnecessary there." I think the "there" is unnecessary.

   • Sounds fine to me.

   • Second deployment abroad, "German East Africa to replace Bussard there." Again, the "there" doesn't seem to be adding anything.

   • Removed.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Overall very solid, just a few minor comments on prose. Placing the article on hold until these can be addressed. Dana boomer (talk) 23:47, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

   Thanks yet again, I think everything should be corrected. Parsecboy (talk) 12:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

   And again everything looks good, so passing to GA. Dana boomer (talk) 16:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Sperber

I have a Picture of my great grandfather who severed on the Sperber we always referred to him as sea Opa 76.66.175.168 (talk) 22:43, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

SMS Sperber

update on Photo my great grandfather's name was Franz Leopold Kollandt. He served for a long time on SMS Sperber Diane Mills 76.66.175.168 (talk) 23:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)