Talk:Saint David

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.

Saints High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism Low‑importance

	Saint David is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Catholicism task list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : see Draft articles Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page) Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Do we need a citation for a calendar calculation?

The note about his death being "generally accepted" as 589 may need a citation, but the "citation needed" flag appears to be on the statement that 1 March 589 was a Tuesday, which is a simple mathematical fact about the Julian calendar that can be readily checked any number of ways. It seems odd to require documentation for such a thing. If the Welsh somehow presaged Pope Gregory's new calendar 1000 years early and made 1 March 589 a Sunday, that would indeed require a citation.. Markjreed (talk) 12:16, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Looking into it, it seems that 589 is but one of several dates, another favourite is 601, but nothing is certain; looking at the wording, it appears that someone felt that saying that he was born on a Tuesday would therefore fix the year as 589, and someone else appropriately queried this. I have reworded slightly, and put in a cite, but more work is needed in this area. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 19:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protection

This article has been semi-protected. Semi-protection prevents edits from unregistered users (IP addresses), as well as edits from any account that is not autoconfirmed (is at least four days old and has at least ten edits to Wikipedia) or confirmed. Such users can request edits to this article by proposing them on this talk page, using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template if necessary to gain attention. New users may also request the confirmed user right by visiting Requests for permissions. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 19:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 February 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

TYPO: In the third sentence of the second paragraph in the "Legend" section, change the word "practised" to "practiced" Quietlyartistic (talk) 18:56, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: This is correct spelling. See WP:ENGVAR RudolfRed (talk) 20:03, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

typo for "Calixtus"

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

"Quick facts" section shows "Calixtus", links to page with spelling "Callixtus" Aa599 (talk) 17:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

 Note: (Requester means infobox). The target article is inconsistent with itself, even preferring the one-L version in most of the article body, so I'm unsure what should be done with this. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 20:34, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

 Done @Deacon Vorbis: It was a mis-spelling of Pope Callixtus II in the infobox who was listed in the "canonized_by =" field. In most of these cases the mis-spelling is setup as a redirect to the correct article. I just simply replaced the incorrect spelling (Pope Calixtus II) which is a redirect with the correct article title & spelling Pope Callixtus II. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 21:40, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

@Alucard 16: Are you sure though? My point was that if you actually look at that page, almost every use except the actual title and the first mention uses one L rather than 2. Not a huge deal for me, I just wasn't sure if you understood why I was unsure in the first place. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 21:48, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

I was unsure as well until I clicked on the wiki-link for Pope Calixtus II and realized it kept redirecting to Pope Callixtus II so I just chalked it up to a mis-spelling. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 07:09, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

How did David become the patron saint?

How, and when, did St David become adopted as the patron saint of Wales? This seems to me to be a fundamental piece of information that is missing from the article. FreeFlow99 (talk) 17:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Wales and Patron saint disappoint too. Catholic Encyclopedia says a patron is "one who has been assigned by a venerable tradition, or chosen by election". The later statement "An authentic catalogue of patron saints of countries of the world has yet to be made" makes election seem the less likely. Sparafucil (talk) 10:26, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Canonisation date

What does "David was officially recognised at the Holy See by Pope Callixtus II in 1120" mean? Elsewhere it is stated that he was canonised in 1123. Does this refer to something different or is the year incorrect? 195.213.169.161 (talk) 15:58, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

"Now" used incorrectly

The word "now" is used incorrectly in the text. I'd fix it, but there's no "Edit" button. 90.202.97.45 (talk) 22:48, 1 March 2024 (UTC)