Talk:Secular humanism

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Atheism High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
For more information and how you can help, click the [Show] link opposite: If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page. Quick help Project's main talk page Article layout Links to atheism-related information · List of free online resources Writing about religion · Article development Citing sources · Verifying sources · About original research Assume good faith · Be civil Recent activity Core articles the "Atheism" article Articles recently added to Category:Atheism To do edit history watch purge Join WikiProject atheism and be bold. Add a userbox to your page ({{User WikiProject Atheism}} or {{User WPA2}}) and attract potential members. Help with articles. See this month's adopt-an-article. Help out with this to-do list. Be consistent Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (see layout style, "The perfect article" and Featured articles). Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box) Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it. Maintenance, etc. Find sources for all positions of an article (see Citing sources and atheism references). Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process). Watch the list of atheism-related articles and add to accordingly. Always write for an encyclopedia. Articles to improve Agnosticism Create Articles on notable atheists Expand an atheism stub Immediate attention State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments. False choice into False dilemma: discuss whether you are for or against this merge here Clarify references in Atheism using footnotes. Secular movement defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century.

Philosophy: Ethics / Religion Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces: /  Ethics Philosophy of religion

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Adherents

Those who call themselves humanists are estimated to number between four and five million people worldwide.

I don't know what this intends to mean. People who call themselves "secular humanists" first and foremost? People with an actual SH tattoo? Or just the T-shirt?

If you broaden this out to mean people who would at least somewhat identify with this philosophy, you could easily find 4-5 million in Canada alone (and probably each of Holland, Scandinavia, and Australia/New Zealand, too). — MaxEnt 20:56, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

I agree; 4 to 5 million seems rediculously (and embarrassingly) low. What's the source and date for that figure? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmarterAlec (talk • contribs) 14:24, June 25, 2021 (UTC)

The sources are in the body. Both were dead links but I found internet archive urls for them. One failed to verify (the term "million" doesn't appear on the page), the other (from 1997) does include the 5 million figure, but it's explicitly only referring to how many members belong to organisations affiliated to Humanists International (well, its precursor). I fixed and tagged the refs in this diff, and may go ahead and remove those numbers in the future if nobody is able to find better sources and/or more accurate figures. Jr8825 • Talk 16:32, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Ethics and pseudoscience

@Editor2020: Currently, we have "a philosophy or life stance that embraces ... ethics". But what philosophy or life stance doesn't? Unless we can specify what is distinctive about secular humanist ethics beyond what the rest of the sentence implies (by "philosophical naturalism while specifically rejecting religious dogma" etc.), best to leave that out. As for "rejecting ... pseudoscience", this is pointless since there is no philosophy that accepts "pseudoscience". It means something to reject religious dogma, supernaturalism and superstition because there are people and philosophies that accept all three. Srnec (talk) 02:20, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

I think that pseudoscience can go. Concerning "ethics", I have found and added a link to secular ethics.Editor2020 (talk) 02:31, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Criticism section needed?

Evangelicals represent a significant portion of the US population, and they tend to be critical of secular humanism. In order to give the article a sense of balance, it feels like it would be good to have a Criticism section that outlines the main points of evangelicals and others who are critical of secular humanism. --Westwind273 (talk) 19:22, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

The US population represents just over 4% of the global population, and we take a global perspective. Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Criticism sections are deprecated. Any criticism should be naturally worked into the article. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 17:53, 28 October 2021 (UTC)