Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:South Arch volcanic field

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconVolcanoes Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSeamounts (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Seamounts, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconHawaii
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.


"Precursor" lead contradiction.

[edit]

The lead precursor statement contradicts the later reference. If you aren't sure, take it out of the lead. 72.141.106.240 (talk) 07:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's not entirely clear to me how it does not appear to be a precursory volcano is contradicted by The South Arch volcanic field is located upstream of the Hawaiian hotspot[10] and has been described as "precursory"[11] although it does not appear to be an early stage of a typical Hawaiian shield volcano.[3] as "precursory" is just a word while the last sentence is the actual explanation. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:42, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vague sentence

[edit]

"before and during the last 10,000 years" does not actually define a period: every moment since the big bang falls into that period. It should be rewritten but I do not know what it should be.SkyLined (talk) 20:29, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was a (disarticulate) way of saying that it was active both during the last 10,000 years (in the Holocene) but also a while before. I've yanked part of the sentence as the "last 10,000 years" is the most interesting aspect. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:53, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]