Talk:Sudden cardiac death of athletes
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sudden cardiac death of athletes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. | This article is within the scope of||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as Mid-importance). |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | ||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||||||
|
Doping?
[edit]Is doping a likely cause? Just asking. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022535 128.76.247.189 (talk) 05:22, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the journal reference. I've added it to the article with a summary sentence: "...evidence has been inconclusive..." —24.191.101.223 (talk) 09:30, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Table
[edit]The breakdown of causes is nonsense and needs to be replaced. The text introducing it says that it is based on a study of 12 cases. That means that all percentages must be integral multiples of (100/12) = 8.3. Percentages such as 3 are mathematically impossible.Bill (talk) 18:39, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- Belated thanks. That section of the article was heavily vandalized, and you were reading it after someone stupidly changed 387 cases to 12. The table itself was fine, and shortly afterward the correct 387 was restored in the text. —173.56.111.206 (talk) 07:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)