Talk:Syria–Turkey border

Syria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maps Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Middle East / Ottoman / Cold War C‑class

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
C	This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces: /  Middle Eastern military history task force Ottoman military history task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Untitled

I tried to find out why there is this weird single-village salient at Topraktutan (Beysun), but apparently this is just the way the boundary was drawn by the Franco-Turkish commission of 1938/9 as reported in the protocol of 3 May 1939. If there is any specific reason for placing the village in Turkey, it is presumably mentioned there. The US State Department report of 1978 just says the border goes "across mountainous topography" between the Orontes and the Kara Dourane. But the border does seem to roughly follow topography, either rivulets or hill crests, so maybe that's the only reason. There is a monument marking the southernmost point, including some martial pronouncement involving bayonets and honour attributed to Atatürk, but that may be just generic nationalism without any special relation to this weird one-village protrusion of Turkish territory. I just find it striking how such random details sometimes end up making history, as in this case with the 2015 Russian Sukhoi Su-24 shootdown. The village does not seem to have been important enough for much google-able context, but "the Internet" tells me it had 500 or so inhabitants in the 1980s, but was later evacuated due to landslides and/or flooding. --dab (𒁳) 12:07, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Syrian claims over Antakia

Syria still has claims over this region, which is actually the most interesting thing there is to say about the Syro-Turkish border. So why is there no mention of this in the article? There are official government maps in which this area is considered a Turkish-occupied territory of Syria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.188.187.235 (talk) 13:58, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

I have added some information about this to the history section.WisDom-UK (talk) 13:36, 4 April 2020 (UTC)