Talk:Tea Fire

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:California: Southern California Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Wildfire Low‑importance

	Tea Fire is part of WikiProject Wildfire, which collaborates on wildfire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Can someone add coordinates of where the Tea House was located? --Rosiestep (talk) 16:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Celebrity homeowners

Come ON, is this a gossip rag? As if the list of affected celebrities isn't silly (not to mention un-encyclopedic) enough, the article goes on to list others who live in the area but weren't affected. This is an encyclopedia, not a Chamber of Commerce press release. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 22:38, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

I agree in part, and disagree in part, with the comment. The list of unaffected celebrities is not useful. The reference to Christopher Lloyd's home being lost is pertinent, but I think given too much prominence in the overall article. I think the quotes from Schwarzenegger and Lowe are good first-hand accounts of the fire and its impact. Not so sure about the value of the Oprah quote. I'll tinker with the article a bit. Cbl62 (talk) 22:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

A distinct improvement!--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tea Fire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090615220625/http://latimesblogs.latimes.com:80/laland/2008/11/christopher-llo.html to http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2008/11/christopher-llo.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)