Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:The Guardian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Guardian article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWLArchives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 90 days 
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconGreater Manchester High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNewspapers High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconJournalism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMedia Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Media To-do List:

WikiProject iconEdinburgh Festival Fringe (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Edinburgh Festival Fringe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

is it appropriate to use the term "center-left"?[edit]

in the infobox the Guardian is characterized as "center-left", though the source that is attached to the link describe it as left-wing. If it is a mistake, it should be corrected. Multiple academic sources characterize the Guardias=n as left-wing too Wfcebfyhjsdw (talk) 18:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

also in the last three general elections the Guardian has endorsed the Labour party, that should also added into the main page Wfcebfyhjsdw (talk) 18:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, it's Centre-left, not Center-left. That spelling difference is important. "Center" is the spelling in the USA, a country with a very different view on where the centre is from most other western nations. Secondly, the description in the Infobox has multiple sources, not just one. I see none that describe it as left-wing (although at least one is behind a paywall). They all seem somewhat imprecise in their categorisation of the paper. HiLo48 (talk) 23:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A Guardian editor has admitted to being center-left. Your projections at American politics is irrelevant to that. 69.113.233.201 (talk) 15:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merger from TheGuardian.com[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Since 2004, we have had a separate article for The Guardian's website, TheGuardian.com. I'd argue these are not sufficiently separate topics, that there's not so much there that couldn't be merged here, and the result is a second article on effectively the same subject, but rarely updated and with a tenth of the watchers. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 23:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; these articles should be merged. GnocchiFan (talk) 17:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree. I don't see a reason for these two articles to be separate. Seems like a lot of overlap. Eric Schucht (talk) 00:19, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, they should be merged. 178.120.71.47 (talk) 01:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Same reason. They are the same title. TheGreatestLuvofAll ( chat with me ) 18:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed - think they are editorially the same, no other major newspaper has this distinction (i.e. no separate article for thetimes.co.uk). Chichickov (talk) 16:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are they editorially the same? If so, were they always the same? If so, yes, merge, but if not I'm not so sure. The way this article is phrased is ambiguous. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Yvette cooper[edit]

She’s no blairite. She’s a Brownite. 2A00:23EE:2970:1CC2:BC93:748F:CFF7:74EB (talk) 14:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

India's prime minister shree Narendra Modi[edit]

about PMO of india 146.196.37.162 (talk) 04:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]