Talk:The Making of the English Landscape

The Making of the English Landscape has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 13, 2014. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from The Making of the English Landscape appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 September 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that William George Hoskins' The Making of the English Landscape (1955) is widely used as a text in local and environmental history courses?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Making of the English Landscape.

Wikipedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Making of the English Landscape/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Erachima (talk · contribs) 21:54, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this page, expected timescale later this evening. If you're active at the moment and want a head start, Chiswick, note that the current outcome would be a Hold on the basis of the same lead issues that were a delay for Historia Plantarum. --erachima talk 21:54, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, on review, I see three issues I'd like addressed before passing the article.

The lead section is, as mentioned, brief and inadequate. Please expand it to comply with WP:LEAD as an apt summary of the article.Y

Extended with summaries of contents, illustrations and criticism. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:50, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The description of chapter 2 is slight versus the others. Is there a reason for this?Y

Extended with description and linked examples. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:27, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You discuss the illustrative plates contained in the book at some length, but do not illustrate the article with examples of any. Why not?Y

Added Plate 13, "a sunken lane in East Devon", as the example discussed in most detail in the text, with NFUR. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:59, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your rationale for the image is incorrect. The image is not being used to illustrate what a sunken lane is, and if it were that would be invalid, since it's relatively trivial to go photograph a sunken lane under a free license instead of using the one he made. Rather, the image itself is a subject of discussion in the article. --erachima talk 07:14, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Updated rationale as indicated. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:30, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the mean time, it's On Hold. --erachima talk 03:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My concerns have been addressed, so the article passes. Good work yet again. --erachima talk 08:14, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the review and the perceptive suggestions. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Television section suggests that Hoskins only presented one T.V. programme, but my copy of Hoskins, W.G., 1978, 'One Man's England' BBC, London states on the flyleaf that it was 'based on the 12 BBC2 Programmes Landscapes of England, in which Professor Hoskins examines selected areas of England.'

Manninagh1958 (talk) 21:59, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plate 13

The illustration said to be plate 13 in the article is different from plate 13 in my Penguin (1985) edition, although the text is broadly similar. Did the illustrations change with the publication of the paperback edition? Rjm at sleepers (talk) 06:30, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's very possible. I've just checked and it is indeed plate 13 in my copy. I've removed the mention of plate, we usually don't mention such things anyway. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]