Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:The Theory of the Leisure Class

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconEconomics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMarketing & Advertising Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconSociology Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sentence needs rewriting

[edit]

I'm a native English speaker and I can't make sense of this (21st century subheading, end of first paragraph). Moved here in case anyone can work on making sense of it:

That the cultural irrelevance of the sociology and the economics of Veblen is in his dismissal of the theory of rational expectations of 18th-century classical economics, and that the American leisure-class would risk social and economic irrelevance if unemployed.[1]

References

  1. ^ Landsburg 2007.

MartinPoulter (talk) 14:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]