Talk:Vermilion Range (Minnesota)
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
Mining Low‑importance | |||||||
|
WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | This article is part of||
Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
This article has been marked as needing an infobox. |
I've never done any sort of editing at Wikipedia - I really don't know what I'm doing.
But in case anyone sees this:
The Vermilion Iron formation is NOT part of the proterozic Animikie Group. The Vermilion Iron formation is Archean (early preCambrian). The Vermilion Iron formation is pre-Algoman orogany, the other (Amimikie Group) Minnesota iron formations are post-Algoman orogany.
This same error appears at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animikie_Group
Please pardon any spelling errors.
208.85.39.42 (talk) 13:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
The "Lake Superior Iron Ranges" map used with the article spells "Vermilion" improperly.
[edit]The article title and body are correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.128.142.233 (talk) 03:45, 19 March 2018 (UTC)