Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Vicky de Lambray

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconLGBT studies
WikiProject iconThis article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
WikiProject iconWomen
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconSexology and sexuality: Sex work Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Notable enough

[edit]

Given that there has been a fair amount of comment about VdL over the years, in a number of national newspapers/magazines in the UK for example, I don't agree with the tag and will remove it. However I don't agree with the article as it currently stands either - too much fluff - so suggest that whoever tagged have a go at Wikifying the article (which would be a more reasonable tag, I would have thought) Testbed 17:02, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]