Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:w3m

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconInternet
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconComputing: Software / Free and open-source software
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Free and open-source software.

Discontinued?

[edit]

Tim@ marked w3m discontinued on 3 Dec. 2015 in “Comparison of web browsers”. Is he wrong or has no one gotten around to updating w3m’s article page by adding that it is discontinued?

Not sure. Similar question asked 2017-09 at https://sourceforge.net/p/w3m/discussion/122555/thread/2d43cfe8/?limit=25#9ea0. And if you go to the homepage at http://w3m.sourceforge.net/index.en.html and try to view the mailing list archive at http://www.sic.med.tohoku.ac.jp/~satodai/w3m-dev-en/ you'll find it's a dead link. With that said, the debian version looks to be getting new code (which you can see at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/w3m or at the github mirror over at https://github.com/tats/w3m/commits/master).II | (t - c) 16:54, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

most notable feature

[edit]

That's an odd most notable feature (particularly because the given source isn't as enthused as the editor who added that comment). It doesn't illustrate a difference versus other text-browsers TEDickey (talk) 19:14, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]