Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Wilhelm Schmidt (linguist)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconChristianity: Catholicism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconReligion High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLinguistics
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

[edit]

Did Schmidt say the various cultures had the common idea of a benevolent Creator or that they "created a God"? I don't have Karen Armstrong's book in front of me. --Uncle Ed (talk) 00:39, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced, dubious

[edit]

"Schmidt managed to prove that Mon–Khmer language has inner connections with other languages of the South Seas, one of the most significant findings in the field of linguistics." What does "inner connections" mean? What "other languages of the South Seas" does this refer to? If this is what Schmidt claimed, do modern studies confirm it? (I suspect not.) "One of the most significant findings in the field of linguistics"? Nonsense: even if it is valid, and very important for Austroasiatic studies, it is of practically no significance to other linguists, made no great advance in methodology or knowledge about language in general.Linguistatlunch (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]