Talk:William Miller (preacher)

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Military / Politics and Government / Science and Academia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

New York (state) Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Seventh-day Adventist Church High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list: edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

Christianity: Witnesses High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses (assessed as Top-importance).

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

Opinion of Jews

What did he think about Jews?

Psychological profile?

Joseph Smith, Jr (the Mormon prophet) seems to be treated in the psychological litterature, but what about this person? ... said: Rursus (bork²) 16:50, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Smith called himself a prophet. Miller was just a bible student whose interpretation of Biblical prophecies became popular, but not because of his personality or force of character. Johnjonesjr (talk) 03:43, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Influence on Jehova's Wittnesses

Just seen the influence mentioned on a segment of the show QI (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QI), which lead me to read the article, but it is not mentioned here. So I did a small Google and Wikipedia search on it - I didn't go too deeply into Google since the first few sites shown already mentioned it and it is also mentioned on a few other Wikipedia articles:

On Millerism it is at least indirectly mentioned here via Charles Taze Russell - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millerism#Influences - and the Jehova's Wittnesses article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jehovah%27s_Witnesses) has him mentioned under "Formative influences". I am not versed enough to even know if adding this would be appropriate, yet alone how exactly regarding sources and such, but I think it could be useful to have it mentioned on this article as well, so maybe someone who is more experienced could look into this.

Also, since I am already on it, this sentence here:

"Miller commenced with Genesis 1:1, studying each verse and not moving on until he felt the meaning was clear."

English is only my second language, but this reads a bit weird for me. From context I would say that he went through the whole bible and stayed on every verse until he felt the meaning was clear for him, but it still feels oddly phrased. Maybe this is just me (as I even had to look up the word "commenced"), but I feel like, if going with that sentence, adding the part that he went through the whole bible would help, something like "Miller went through the whole bible, commencing with Genesis 1:1, studying each verse and not moving on until he felt the meaning was clear." or "...studying each verse of the bible without moving on...". But again, just the feeling and feedback of someone who isn't a native speaker :) .

Sephtan (talk) 21:37, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Much of Jehovah's Witnesses' doctrine is indeed derived from the Adventist teachings of William Miller, and as you say, this is already given attention at various articles. However, it does not seem essential to make the point at this article, otherwise, equal attention would have to be given to Miller's influence on every individual Adventist group (at least, all of appreciable size). It would be technically accurate to add Jehovah's Witnesses to the list of denominations in the {{Adventism}} template, but this would immediately be met with disagreement, as JWs do not self-identify as Adventists despite their Adventist origins and eschatology.

Regarding your second point, the sentence in its current form seems okay to me (although specifically stating that he started at Genesis 1:1 is somewhat redundant because it is the default starting point). The fact that he went through the whole Bible is implied by the rest of the statement, and the paragraph already provides the context of "examining the Bible closely" in the previous sentence.--Jeffro77 (talk) 03:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)