Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Works council

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconEurope Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Italianfaucets.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid link[edit]

Page link is invalid for "European Commission: European Works Council legislation"

Need to replace link: http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/cha/c10805.htm with updated link: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/employment_and_social_policy/social_dialogue/c10805_en.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.34.223.1 (talkcontribs) 2011-04-14 (UTC)

General introduction[edit]

I find the general introduction highly missleading and not stating the actual facts. The subsection Germany lists the facts, but the toplevel info brings up some side-aspects which are presented one-sided. Betriebsräte are a way for employee empowerment, not an "extended arm" of a union. The law clearly separated what each organisation is able to rule or bargain! No national agreement is changed by a local Betriebsrat, there you need to have a local agreement with a union ("Haustarifvertrag").

Also the "three main views" are not even referenced. And to my understanding they are written in a way to disgrace the Betriebsrat. This is not wiki-style

-> Please review and correct these factual wrong explanations.

62.96.12.26 (talk) 12:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC) 62.96.12.26 (talk) 12:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only positive?[edit]

The section on Germany makes it sound like there are zero downsides and everything is perfect. Seems a bit unrealistic and sounds like marketing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:8F00:3DF:6495:982B:E83D:A5E5 (talk) 19:07, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Libertarian?[edit]

Why is this article shown as being part of the series on libertarianism? The series doesn't mention it and the article never draws a connection to libertarianism either (and it strikes me as more social democratic, although I'm hardly an expert). 50.232.161.120 (talk) 02:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]