Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Zadara

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconCompanies
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconComputing: Software Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

COI hatnote

[edit]

I usually remove COI hatnotes unless the specific questionable edits are highlighted on the talk page - otherwise, further edits are inadvertently discouraged. In this case, it's pretty easy to see which edits are raising suspicions, so I'm adding this section instead of removing the hatnote. The creator and another recent editor with single purpose accounts have been adding promotional and marketing verbiage which is being reverted. Anyone looking at the edit history can see what's happening.Timtempleton (talk) 21:16, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article's editing history

[edit]

This article has a somewhat troubled history. It was flagged for inside editing and was stripped of a lot of info before the remaining info was nominated for deletion. The nomination was withdrawn due to no consensus, but I completely rewrote the article anyway to get it to GA status. A difference of opinion about what is notable ensued, with further additional editing, and more info being removed. To save future editors the trouble of initiating another deletion nomination without seeing the full version, I'm including a link to the version I completed before it was pared down [[1]].Timtempleton (talk) 19:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is Techseen a reliable source?

[edit]

I've never heard of them, but they just published an interview with Zadara's Chief Architect, about a product that isn't in the article.[[2]].Timtempleton (talk) 19:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]