Template talk:Freemasonry footer

This template is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles

◆ WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Improve to Featured Article status
Add content to stubs…
Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc.
Requests
[Watch this list]
- Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable)
Participate in articles listed for deletion
Need images
New Article to be created

Orders, decorations, and medals

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles

Europe

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles

Merge

@Primefac: Thanks for initiating the merge. However, would you mind bringing all former contents from Europe and Americas in? PPEMES (talk) 10:38, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because they're all either redlinks or (as in the case of Mexico) 100% redirects to the same location. If and when we have articles on them they can be added, but the consensus in the TFD (as well as navbox design in general) is to not have a ton of redlinks. Primefac (talk) 12:10, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As long as the disappeared entries lose 0 % of redirections, not even section redirects within single articles, then I guess your action makes sense. PPEMES (talk) 13:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]