This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
ok, i know that ie for mac isn't continued, tasman is uesd for mac office 2004&2008 --> why is tasman now a previous technology?
It is only previous technology to Internet Explorer, not in general. The idea is the technology only in older IE versions is separated off from current stuff, even if development continued separately from IE. I agree the section name leads to confusion, but when its all grouped together it makes it seem like those technologies are still in internet explorer. Digita (talk) 14:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I am also in favor of a bit cleaning up of this template. It's much bloated. Because IE was back then updated as a system component, a lot of technologies were bundled with it. But this template should only list those which were very prominently tied with IE or are directly internet related.
Regarding smart tags, I feel as an end-user feature (and prominent one at that), it is not present so it should go to past technology.
Notes: I changed previous technologies to implementations, because it connotate too much on discontinued technologies which the group isn't referring to at all. --142.22.48.251 (talk) 20:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
