Template talk:Liberalism US

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liberalism US template.

• Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
• New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

• Assume good faith
• Be polite and avoid personal attacks
• Be welcoming to newcomers
• Seek dispute resolution if needed

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.Politics: American Mid‑importance

	This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mid	This template has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This template is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

United States Mid‑importance

	This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts
Mid	This template has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for the {{Liberalism US}} sidebar and {{Liberalism US footer}} templates. Changes to one template should be reflected in the other as well. If your message only relates to one of the templates, please specify sidebar or footer.

A mistake

I put Color of Change in the organizations category by accident. Before I could change it, however, this article received protected status so I cannot edit it anymore. Could someone get rid of it, please? 108.18.179.237 (talk) 20:19, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Henry Clay

Where is the evidence that Clay was liberal, or conservative, for that matter? I find it hard to see evidence of him as ideological. He strikes me as a man whose primary goal was to "get things done" to use the old cliche, and he did not address major concerns of either ideology at the time. 108.18.179.237 (talk) 01:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

You are correct that Clay does not belong here. He was part of the conservative whig party Island Pelican (talk) 05:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

William Jennings Bryan

A broad consensus exists among both liberals and conservatives that Bryan was an economic populist with deeply conservative views on religion including (presumably) sexual morality. This page is clearly meant to reflect individuals with liberal social AND fiscal views which is why libertarians are also not included. For these reasons, I will remove Bryan. Does anyone object? 108.18.178.195 (talk) 20:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 January 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I am submitting an edit request on this page because there were two individuals with the last name "Murray". Their first names are not mentioned and to avoid confusion, may I please have editing access to add their first names for complete transparency. XFacorsuperfan15 (talk) 21:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. I see only one "Murray" in this template. Please be more clear about the change that you would like to see. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)