Template talk:NSWLocos

Trains Portal

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This template is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Australia: New South Wales / Transport

	Australia portal NSWLocos is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
	This template is supported by WikiProject New South Wales.
	This template is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport.

XPLORER capitalisation

I see User:Turingway has reverted back to the incorrect capitalisation for the XPLORER train. Discussion here: Talk:New South Wales Xplorer Mqst north (talk) 01:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scope

The template should list those pieces of rolling stock that were either built for the NSWGR and its successors, or spent a considerable part of their lives based in NSW. If we included every locomotive that ever operated in NSW, we would be including virtually every class of standard gauge from Victoria, South Australia and Western Australia. Those templates only reflect the locomotives built for operators in that state, as should this one. Murina77 (talk) 08:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Readability improvements

I know us people in NSW don't like to learn from other states (especially the one down south), but I think that the table should be able to be collapsed so that only relevant sections are visible to the reader. See Template:Victorian rolling stock for an example. I'd have to say, if it gets any larger, it might be hard to read. Fork99 (talk) 14:00, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]