Template talk:USAF equipment

Military history: Aviation / Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States

	This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force North American military history task force United States military history task force

Aviation

This template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Space systems

• None of the "Space Systems" listed are actually weapons. Why have they been included in this template? --GW… 06:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

The Air Force considers them weapons systems in the same manner they consider the AOC and trainer aircraft weapons systems.--Ndunruh (talk) 13:45, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

This template should be renamed USAF equipment. --108.38.59.50 (talk) 23:59, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Indeed, uniforms, which are included, aren't weapons. (Hohum ^@) 20:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Template moved. No oppose votes, and it is a legitimate move: template covers more than just weaponry. (non-admin closure)  — Amakuru (talk) 22:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Template:USAF weapons → Template:USAF equipment – (No rationale provided.) --Relisted. Steel1943 (talk) 00:31, 17 November 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.51.29.188 (talk) 23:52, 14 November 2013‎ (UTC)

• Speedy procedural close: No rationale provided and no supporting comments made after waiting for three days. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:19, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Follow-up comment: It does appear that the template includes various items of non-weaponry equipment, so the suggestion seems worth considering. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:29, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
• Support move to a more accurate title - especially as there is equipment that is not necessarily a weapons system such as Launch Vehicles, Targets, and Uniforms. - WPGA2345 - ☛ 23:23, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Patrol planes & weaponry?

Is there a reason for mthe template missing patrol planes like the Poseidon & Orion, and the weaponry for such, eg torpedoes, depth bombs? Macktheknifeau (talk) 13:24, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Because those are navy and not Air Force Garuda28 (talk) 16:31, 16 April 2019 (UTC)