User:Winhunter

Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.

Languages

yue呢位用户嘅母语系粤语/广州话。
呢位用戶嘅母語係粵語/廣州話。

en-5This user can contribute with a professional level of English.

zh-3該用戶能以熟練的中文進行交流。
该用户能以熟练的中文进行交流。

Search user languages

Userbox

This user is a Christian.

BBAThis user has a Bachelor of Business Administration degree.

pno-2This user is an intermediate pianist.

This user is a recent changes patroller.

This user comes from Hong Kong.
這個用戶來自香港。

Search user languages

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update

No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

Articles I...

Created

• Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
• Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
• Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
• Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
• University Grants Committee

Expanded significantly

• People's Commune

My other accounts

• WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
• Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)

My bookmarks

Wikipedia

Wikipedia

• Administrators' how-to guide
• Administrators' reading list
• Images and media for deletion
• Criteria for speedy deletion
• Dispute Resolution
• Guide to requests for adminship
• Help desk
• Image copyright tags
• Sock puppetry
• Spam#Internal spamming
• Template messages/User talk namespace
• Vandalism

Category

Category

• Category:Archival templates
• Category:Articles that need to be wikified
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion
• Category:Protection templates
• Category:Requests for unblock
• Category:Speedy deletion
• Category:Wikipedia maintenance templates

Misc

Misc

• Special:Contributions/AntiVandalBot
• Block Log
• Deletion Log
• Help:Edit summary
• My summary usages
• My edit counts
• Template talk:Polltop
• User:Dragons flight/AFD summary
• User:Voice_of_All/UsefulJS

Tools

Tools

• Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser
• Wikipedia:VandalProof
• User:AmiDaniel/WhodunitQuery

Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests	Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages	0
Wikipedians looking for help	0
Requests for unblock	142
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests	49
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests	74
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests	13
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests	1
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests	114
Requested RD1 redactions	17
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations	1
Candidates for speedy deletion	12
Open sockpuppet investigations	114
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Administrative backlog

AfD debates relisted 3 or more times

Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions

Requests for unblock

SPI cases awaiting administration

Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion

Wikipedia:Closure requests

Wikipedia:Copyright problems

Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

Wikipedia:Requested moves

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Page mover

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations

MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist

Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

Reports

Bot-reported

• 2409:4073:211c:58bd::1294:20b1 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

  No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

CSD / PRODs

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries User requested 0 Empty articles 0 Nonsense pages 0 Spam pages 1 Importance or significance not asserted 1 Possibly contested candidates 6 Other candidates 10

The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days: ( source / chronological order / expired ) Category:Expired proposed deletions

Deletion backlog Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 8 items Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 1 item Requested RD1 redactions – 17 items Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

• Joe Bidens Favorite Ice Cream Store (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

  This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 11:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

• Dabichb (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "bich" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Bich can be a Vietnamese name or an Anglo-Saxon surname - make sure this is not the case before blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

• Kamala Diana Obama (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

  This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 17:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

• Justaspoonfulofstardust (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

  This username matched "Used f instead of ph attempting to skip filter: long username without spaces. Violating string: justaspoonphulophstardust" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

• AndaniRoyalFamily (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 19:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

• COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 20:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• PokeFefr (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Cahk (talk) 09:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

  Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Salvio ^giuliano 10:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

• AembitDan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See user:AembitDan/sandbox. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:55, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

  Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cullen328 (talk) 18:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

  @Cullen328 Out of curiousity and not a question on your judgment, how or why is this not a violation? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

  Vanderwaalforces, WP:USERNAME says usernames are acceptable if they contain a company or group name but are clearly intended to denote an individual person, such as "Mark at WidgetFactory". Cullen328 (talk) 19:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

  @Cullen328 I am aware of what anything that has to do with usernames, but this person is clearly Draft:David Goldschlag and not “Dan”. What if Dan is something else at this point? As well, what if Dan is actually a person. I’d let this pass. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

  (passing-by user) Unless there's something proves that Dan is a department or something, then this is not a username violation as it reads like 'Dan at Aembit'.

  Their edits could be a other-policies violation, but that doesn't need to be dealt with in this username board. 2804:F1...A7:C558 (talk) 20:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

• FCHistoricalAccount (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and promotional username. At Franklin Central High School. General Ization ^Talk 18:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Requests for page protection

Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Request protection

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Kapil Sibal

• Kapil Sibal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. This page has been the subject of vandalism and addition of poorly cited content for a while, and was previously semi-protected for a short duration. Recently, more uncited information has been added. TryAgainSooner (talk) 16:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CTOPS notice left on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 20:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Origin of the Rashtrakutas

• Origin of the Rashtrakutas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs. IPs are constantly attempting to remove content regarding the origin of the dynasty without consensus. PadFoot (talk) 17:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

WikiFeet

• WikiFeet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Magnet for persistent vandalism. GnocchiFan (talk) 18:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Goodnightmush^Talk 19:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Talk:WikiFeet

• Talk:WikiFeet (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Low-traffic talk page with a high % of disruptive edits compared to constructive ones. Normally would not recommend protecting a talk page but considering non-productive edits have been here for a while until I removed them today, I think protection is best. GnocchiFan (talk) 18:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Goodnightmush^Talk 19:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Tennis at the 2024 Summer Olympics

• Tennis at the 2024 Summer Olympics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: I am requesting full page protection for at least one year, if not indefinite, for Tennis at the 2024 Summer Olympics. Consistent edit warring and removing/moving of information in the article without consensus. The disruptive editor claims it goes against WP:OLYMPICS guidelines, which have no fixed and outlined layout for SPORT at YEAR Summer Olympic pages in their guidelines or MOS. Tennis project's Olympic page layout is standard and within consensus. This warring has been going on for a full month. No attempts to reason on either of the project's talk pages or this page's talk page was any fruitful. They falsely accuse others of violating the guidelines when they are the ones causing the disruption.

Diffs with edit warring and disruptive editing: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]

Qwerty284651 (talk) 19:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. There is DR/N. I am not going to full-protect a page about a now-concluded sporting event lightly. Daniel Case (talk) 20:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Milap Zaveri

• Milap Zaveri (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 19:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Mahdi al-Modarresi

• Mahdi al-Modarresi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent editing to add libelous content. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 20:21, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Mr. Lawrence

• Mr. Lawrence (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: People always make a lot of wrong informations in this Mr. Lawrence page Jamaican Snuggie2 (talk) 20:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Goodnightmush^Talk 21:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Request unprotection

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Request edit

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests

Israel–Hamas war

• Israel–Hamas war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

"Israeli military activities in the Gaza Strip remained unchanged following adoption of the resolution" needs a marker: citation needed. AmbroseVenture (talk) 18:42, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Israel–Hamas war

• Israel–Hamas war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

"On 28 March, the IDF shot and killed two unarmed men in central Gaza, before burying them in sand with bulldozers.[397]" needs to be altered, the source gives two contradicting stories which CNN (the source) didn't clear up. In the article AJ argues without evidence the two videos they present are from the same people, the IDF tells those were two separate incidents. This has to be cleared up to remain factual. AmbroseVenture (talk) 18:44, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Israel–Hamas war

• Israel–Hamas war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The casualty figures for Syria and Lebanon need updating as they are now out of date, the page states that 326 Hezbollah fighters have been killed in Lebanon and 60 in Syria for a total of 386 but Hezbollah itself has admitted that over 410 of its fighters have been killed, the IDF has also provided consistent on the number of Hezbollah fighters eliminated, all of this information is easily accessible. 2A00:23C8:90A:1601:4D05:F3D3:86E0:59B9 (talk) 13:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Russian invasion of Ukraine

• Russian invasion of Ukraine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Clarify the word "tank" in environmental impact subsection image 208.94.128.67 (talk) 14:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

sorry, submitted on accident, the word "Tank" is unclear. does it mean a tank as in a tank of liquid or a combat vehicle? 208.94.128.67 (talk) 14:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

2 protected edit requests v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry Template:Wikipedia languages/core (request) 2024-07-27 11:23 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection" Template:Wikipedia languages (request) 2024-07-30 19:50 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

14 template-protected edit requests v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry Module:Navbox (request) 2024-07-19 19:53 Template-protected (log) Modified by Ged UK on 2014-05-07: "lowering to template protection" Template:Infobox road (request) 2024-07-26 06:18 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-18: "allow template editors to modify" Module:Football box (request) 2024-08-09 15:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2018-10-17: "High-risk Lua module" Module:Football box collapsible (request) 2024-08-09 15:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2018-10-17: "High-risk Lua module" Template:Taxonomy/Archaeplastida (request) 2024-08-12 23:51 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mifter on 2018-12-07: "Highly visible template" Template:Contentious topics/page restriction talk notice base (request) 2024-08-13 06:09 Template-protected (log) Protected by Dreamy Jazz on 2023-01-15: "Highly visible template" Module:Lang-zh (request) 2024-08-17 15:53 Template-protected (log) From Module:Zh: Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-05-03: "High-risk Lua module" Template:Country data Turks and Caicos Islands (request) 2024-08-18 05:22 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify" Template:WikiProject United States (request) 2024-08-19 15:25 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-17: "allow template editors to modify" Template:Infobox comedian (request) 2024-08-20 02:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors" Template:Infobox military person (request) 2024-08-20 02:46 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors" Template:Infobox writer (request) 2024-08-20 02:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors" Template:MultiReplace (request) 2024-08-20 06:46 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikAnimal on 2017-10-09: "Highly visible template; 34,000+ transclusions" Template:Editnotices/Page/Talk:Emma Corrin (request) 2024-08-20 16:32 Title blacklist (log) Matching line: Template:Editnotices\/.* <noedit|errmsg=titleblacklist-custom-editnotice>
Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled (add request · view requests) User:Losipov Losipov (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) For a third time, I'm applying for autopatrolled rights; my first request was denied in April 2023, and my second request was denied in June 2024. The reason for the first decline was that my previous articles were tagged for "notability." After that decline, I worked on bringing articles over from the Russian Wikipedia and had relatively few problems when other editors were reviewing them (I don't bring over everything from those respective pages, so I added a tag for expanding from Russian to let others know that information is still there). The reason for the second decline was that I moved one of my BLP articles back into the mainspace without changing the sourcing, and it was eventually deleted (that was a mistake on my part). Now, roughly two months later, I have had little to no problems with the other articles I have brought over. I respectfully request that I be granted the autopatrolled permission this time around, as I believe it will help lighten the NPP workload to some extent. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Losipov (talk) 20:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([8]). — MusikBot talk 20:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC) Gonna mark this as  Not done; you don't create so many articles that it's a burden on NPP and given the previous issues I'd rather they still get reviewed manually. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC) User:Jordanroderick Jordanroderick (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Reviewer Aszx5000 has messaged me twice that I should be autopatrolled. I don't care for my sake, since the process works fine for me, but I don't want to be a burden on the reviewers. Please either grant or deny this status based on whatever you think is best for the community. Thanks! Jordanroderick (talk) 23:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC) User:Noorullah21 Noorullah21 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Would like to cut down on the backlog of pages that need to be reviewed while I create pages, especially as of recent where I've been working on creating pages for military battles, and Bahmani rulers. I definitely believe the pages I've created shows I am familiar with the guidelines of page notability, and especially quality. I've practiced with this being a new page patroller myself. Noorullah (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC) User:GreatStellatedDodecahedron GreatStellatedDodecahedron (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I have created 25 new pages and would like to request the autopatrolled right. I have been a user since 2007, but have increased my writing on Wikipedia in the last 3 years. I create articles in generally non-controversial areas such as crystallography, symmetry and philately. GreatStellatedDodecahedron (talk) 13:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser (add request · view requests) User:Bunnypranav Bunnypranav (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights: Assists in helping for typo correction. The proof of which can be seen from my contributions in Typo Team Moss-D Bunnypranav (talk) 15:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([9]). — MusikBot talk 15:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)  Not done You now technically meet the header criteria, but you still don't really have enough experience IMO. I will be willing to grant once you've made a few hundred more edits, especially more substantive edits. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC) I understand, but I would be grateful if you could give me a bit more information. Does typo fixing count as substantive edits? If no, then how is typo fixing a starting use for AWB. Thanks in advance. Bunnypranav (talk) 06:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC) Typo fixing is fine as something to do with AWB, but I would not call it a "substantive" edit and it doesn't seem right to count it as a "non-automated edit" either (even if you truly did perform them without any kind of automation), and not doing so would put you clearly below the criteria. I interpreted the idea behind that requirement was more about what the edits did and less about the non-observable requirement of how they were done, and making 500 mostly typo-fixing edits in a month just doesn't establish the kind of track record I look for when granting advanced permissions. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC) Thanks for the feedback and explanation. Bunnypranav (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC) User:NightWolf1223 NightWolf1223 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I am interested in gaining access so that I can maintain GA related tasks as is detailed at WP:GA/MISMATCH#In a subcategory Category:GA-Class articles but not a good article NightWolf1223 <Howl at me•My hunts> 02:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)  Done * Pppery * it has begun... 04:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC) User:OnlyNano OnlyNano (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I edit a lot of drafts and newly created articles. Whether it's fixing MOS issues or improving a draft, my workflow is quite slow. Looking to use AWB to remove the requirement of having several browser tools installed. My main interests of this program are the database scanner (for new page patrol edits pertaining to orphans), and the aforementioned efficiency that I am seeking. OnlyNanotalk 15:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC)  Done * Pppery * it has begun... 01:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Requests for confirmation

Confirmed (add request · view requests) User:Lalaine Branda Lalaine Branda (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Requesting to grant this permission in reason of the registered person/auditor are unfortunately sick. Lalaine Branda (talk) 00:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)  Not done Unintelligible. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC) User:27JJ 27JJ (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello, I'd like to help contribute to wikipedia by archiving sports uniforms, specifically hockey. Many teams outside the NHL do not have their uniforms displayed on their site. I figured to get thru the 10 edits I would update NHL teams for the 2024/2025 season. I'm not necessarily able to edit because the only pages that currently have these are locked as far as I can find. Please mind you, I have followed the requirements 100%. I am happy to make these edits elsewhere, but as noted, I'm not able to find unlocked pages that already have uniform images. Here is an example of an updated uniform set for the Toronto Maple Leafs Link Here 27JJ (talk) 05:26, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed (add request · view requests) User:Yahuzaishat Yahuzaishat (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights I am a contributor with a major focus on indigenous languages, Hausa, to be specific. I am requesting for this right so that I can have access of translating articles from English to Hausa. This is part of my passion for contributing to the largest repository of open knowledge in the world. I hope my request would be reviewed and kindly be approved. Thank you. Yahuzaishat (talk) 16:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer (add request · view requests) User:Xegma Xegma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma(talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC) Question, though I am not an administrator, I see that you have published accepted AFC submissions, even if they lack citations or are in need of some fixing. And some have orange banners on them. Why is this? — 48JCL 01:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC) @48JCL: As they should. The standard at acceptance at AfC is that the article would probably survive an AfD. Nothing more. Declining a draft for surmountable problems like a lack of citations or pretty much anything covered by a cleanup banner is inappropriate. – Joe (talk) 08:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC) I spot checked the 4 most recent accepts and they had lots of citations at time of acceptance. Feel free to link to the specific draft accepts you are concerned with. A complete lack of citations is a valid draftification reason and valid AFC decline reason, but I am not seeing that here. A major lack of citations such as entire paragraphs missing a citation (and also not supported by any WP:GENREFs) could be a valid decline reason (WP:V is policy after all). But it may also be reasonable to accept a draft that is mostly cited and just missing a couple citations, such as Draft:Norah Fulcher. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC) Could anyone please review my request ? It is already couple of days. Xegma(talk) 18:10, 8 August 2024 (UTC) @Xegma: I assume patrolling admins here have been waiting for you to address the concerns raised by 48JCL. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC) Novem is right, I also believe that entire paragraph missing a citation that is a problem, and the draft that mostly cited and just missing a couple citations that is ok to accept the draft. Thanks. Xegma(talk) 16:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC) Firstly, apologies for the delay--this page has been somewhat backlogged of late. I'm ultimately going to have to decline on the basis of your track record at AfD; a 34% match rate (without counting no consensus results) is quite low, and I'm not seeing extensive policy-based reasoning or source analysis in your !votes that would make up for the low match rate.  Not done signed, Rosguill talk 14:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC) User:Iwaqarhashmi Iwaqarhashmi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([10]). — MusikBot talk 20:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC) I see you found the IP at AfC who submits soundtrack articles (41 accepts of soundtracks it looks like). I'm glad to see you've started to accept drafts at AfC, instead of just declining (a ratio of 1 accepted to 348 declined at the time of the last application). I do still have concerns about your experience at AFD, given that, of your last 40 votes, all but 2 of them were pile on votes where the result had basically already been decided based on the number of votes for the conclusion you chose. You accepted one piece of criticism from me, your lack of accepts at AfC, but you do still appear to be pile on voting. Honestly, I'm not sold, but I'll leave it up to someone else whether they want to grant you a trial or not. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC) Thank you for your feedback. I understand your points, I've made lots of contributions recently, and I hope I will be granted a trial to demonstrate my willingness to contribute positively. Best, Waqar💬 07:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC) I'd like to say that I've been working so hard for the past couple of months. I've made so many contributions to AFCs, I've reviewed over 1,160 articles (accepts: 138, declines: 670, and the rest either rejected or speedily deleted) so far. I'm also actively patrolling the new page feed, adding maintenance tags, and tagging articles for speedy deletion like A3, A7, and G11. I've drafted more than 200 articles that either lacked reliable sources or needed additional sources. In the AFD discussions, I voted on more than 150 pages. Without considering the no consensus results, 98.6% of my AfD's were matches, and even though the votes were assumed to be piles on voting, most of my recent votes were very detailed and specific and weren't pointing towards anyone, but I will accept their valuable advice and try my best to make improvements at AFDs as well. Having said that, I believe that all those contributions exhibit my hard work and dedication. I hope I get a chance to at least prove myself by patrolling new pages, and I would be more than happy to help with the backlog. Thanks for your time and consideration. Waqar💬 18:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)  Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. I agree with Hey man im josh's reservations about AfD record, but the AfC record is strong enough that I think a trial is warranted. signed, Rosguill talk 16:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC) Thanks for that. Waqar💬 16:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC) User:Florificapis Florificapis (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I was given a trial for a few months and would like to renew my permissions. I have made good use of my permissions by fixing new pages and judiciously applying CSD whenever necessary. I am still active at NPP and will continue to make good use of my permissions upon renewal. Florificapis (talk) 22:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)  Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Joe Roe (expires 00:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 22:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC) Renewing the permissions for another two months, overall decent but there were enough reviews that I think were incorrect that I want to give feedback on and see improvement over before conferring full permissions  Done signed, Rosguill talk 17:10, 20 August 2024 (UTC) You rushed through 2 dozen different Polish dialect pages in under 10 minutes on July 25. While in general these articles seem to cite an authoritative source, more time should have been spent spot-checking controversial claims and verifying that the cited source actually contains significant coverage of the specific dialect in question and not just Polish linguistics more generally. Noel Hein does not cite significant coverage, and shows clear signs of UPE editing. Bad Shabbos does not cite significant coverage, although I was able to find some online and tag it with {{sources exist}} Kfar Devora's sources are for the most part not accessible, and it is an article that falls under WP:PIA and only cites sources affiliated with Israeli institutions. It should have at least been tagged with {{refimprove}}, and I was unable to quickly find sources that satisfy WP:GNG searching on Google Books and Scholar. Holy Resurrection Orthodox Church of Hakodate does not cite significant independent coverage, although I again was able to find some sources online and tag it with {{sources exist}} signed, Rosguill talk 17:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC) User:Rusty Cat Rusty Cat (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I'd like to help out with the backlog at NPP. My previous experience includes many nominations of drafts under G1, G2, and G3, and a couple instances of article ratings and XfD participation. Rusty 🐈 03:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)  Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 18:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC) User:Pygos Pygos (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I would like to become a new page patrol to accelerate the page creation process, improve the quality of Wikipedia pages, and reduce the huge current backlog. I have a good understanding of what a qualified article would look like, and created around four articles like Organothallium Chemistry. I have also done various other editing, including merging Carbohydrate Chemistry into Carbohydrate. Pygos (talk) 06:35, 7 August 2024 (UTC)  Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 18:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC) User:Tajotep Tajotep (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Two months ago I was given the new page reviewer right, and I want to continue with it. I trust I have made good contributions. Thanks in advance. Tajotep (talk) 10:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment) This user's NPP rights expired on the 5th of August. Rusty 🐈 22:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)  Done Elli (talk | contribs) 13:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC) User:CherryPie94 CherryPie94 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I have created 85 pages including a GA. I am familiar with the p&g on notability and reliable sources. Would like to put my knowledge to use by reviewing pages and help out WikiProject Korea a bit more. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 05:05, 13 August 2024 (UTC)  Done for a three month trial period. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC) User:Tumbuka Arch Tumbuka Arch (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) My last request was declined due to vague votes in AfD. Since then, I have taken my time to learn more and not just rushed to re-request the rights. Then I had created 50 articles when the request was denied. Currently, I have over 714 articles with only 5 deleted. This shows that I have understanding of what GNG and what SIGCOV is. It will be a pleasure in helping reduce the backlog of new created pages. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 09:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)  Not done, I'm seeing more of the same problems that were previously identified as reason to pull the autopatrol permission, e.g. Bibata Nebie, where 2/3 cited sources have nothing to do with Nebie. Articles like Crime in Zambia have entire sections with potentially-controversial claims sitting unreferenced. Your rate of article creations is impressive and overall is a benefit to the encyclopedia, but the inconsistency in quality leads me to believe that conferring new page reviewer permissions would not be appropriate. I also have some concerns that you may be using LLM signed, Rosguill talk 19:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC) User:Botterweg14 Botterweg14 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Per Joe Roe's post on WikiProject Linguistics, I would be willing to help out reviewing new linguistics articles. Botterweg14 (talk) 22:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)  Done Elli (talk | contribs) 13:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC) User:PARAKANYAA PARAKANYAA (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I requested this perm a while ago before I was adequately experienced, and it was recently suggested that I apply again. Since my first request I have participated a lot more at AfC and AfD, which I think has shown me aspects of notability/deletion/creation policies I had less of a grasp of then. I think it would be good to help given the backlog (particularly where it relates to events and literature where I believe myself to have the best grasp on notability criteria). I would like to help with the redirect backlog as well. Thanks! PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:20, 17 August 2024 (UTC)  Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 19:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC) User:Azarctic Azarctic (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I request that I have page reviewer rights to lower the backlog. I typically create articles in royalty and nobility and have made 16 successful articles specialised in royalty as well as I contribute a lot to them and made 4 specialised in writers. I have 1,700 edits in the 9 months I have been on Wikipedia meaning I contribute daily. I do often look at the articles in page patrol and add tags when needed, also draft when needed and delete when needed. I really hope that I can help reduce the backlog! Thanks in advance. Azarctic (talk) 01:37, 17 August 2024 (UTC) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia and your interest in this permission. Unfortunately, I'm seeing several deletions of relatively recently created articles, so I am going to have to decline this request.  Not done signed, Rosguill talk 19:58, 20 August 2024 (UTC) User:Ednabrenze Ednabrenze (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I have created numerous pages and have been involved in AFD. I have a clear understanding of notability guidelines and a careful look at my AFD comments/votes will attest to my understanding of notability policy. I request this right to help in reviewing new articles to reduce the huge backlog of new articles waiting in review queues. Ednabrenze (talk) 09:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)  Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 20:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Requests for page mover

Page mover (add request · view requests) User:ToadetteEdit ToadetteEdit (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Reason for requesting page mover rights: I want to have my page mover rights extended, as I contribute to RM/TR. Was given 3mo trial and it will end on August 20. ToadetteEdit! 08:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)  Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Robertsky (expires 00:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 08:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC) Hi again, Toadette. You were great during the 2024 CrowdStrike-related article title saga! I hope you become a Page Mover at the same time as me! Jruderman (talk) 06:48, 11 August 2024 (UTC) Given User talk:ToadetteEdit#Move review for Donald Trump fist pump photographs just today, as well as a past history of similar closes of deletion discussions at DRV, I am not convinced this should be granted. * Pppery * it has begun... 06:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC) At the least, asking Toadette here what might or should have been done differently seems appropriate. Dekimasuよ! 06:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC) I'm also concerned about User_talk:ToadetteEdit#RM_at_Talk:Ted_Wilson_(figure_skater), which is, at best, a communication failure (A good closer will transparently explain how the decision was reached – WP:NHC), and at worst a headcount to determine consensus (WP:NOTDEMOCRACY). DatGuyTalkContribs 13:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC) @ToadetteEdit: would you please respond to the above concerns? Best, HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 15:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC) Good evening. It has been a while since the request was opened. I've resolved the concern about the Donald Trump photo RM by moving to the appropriate page. I also answered the concerned about the Ted Wilson page, so communication isn't an issue here. My consensus is often misunderstood by many, but this time, I will only focus on closing straightforward RMs and leave controversial ones until I improve my decision-making skills, in addition to answering RMTR requests. ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC) About "my consensus is often misunderstood by many", can you explain what you mean? Whose consensus is being determined in these discussions, and why might your intention be misunderstood frequently? Dekimasuよ! 03:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC) As you can observe on my talk page and the latest archive. therre were people who disagree with my closure and associated consensus. There aren't any consensus from others and people see me as an editor new to closing discussions, and therefore sometimes others do not understand my consensus or confused of it. ToadetteEdit (talk) 05:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC) Thanks for your reply. However, this does not assuage my concerns. Consensus is formed among editors through the process of discussion, and a closure should reflect the consensus that is shown in the discussion. When other editors disagree with one of your closes, this indicates a feeling that your close did not reflect the balance of the result of the discussion, not an intent to discount your perspective because you are a newer closer. Consensus is not an aspect of the editor closing the discussion, so while you may mean "my reading of consensus", we do not normally refer to "my consensus" or "consensus from others" when marking the outcomes of discussions. Dekimasuよ! 06:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC) I understood your statement. It's my sense of consensus and my implementation. At first, editors do not agree with the closure in the first place, so that was what I meant by "consensus misunderstood". ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC) Hello ToadetteEdit. I am going to mark this as  Not done, though I take no pleasure in doing so. One fundamental requirement for page movers is the ability to communicate clearly. I think the exchange directly above is representative of the problem. Quite frankly, it should not have taken two replies to drill down what you meant by my consensus. Ideally it should have been clear in your original comment. If questioned, you should have taken one reply. Occasionally being unclear is okay: We all make mistakes, after all! But the fact that your closures are frequently misunderstood is a problem with your communication, and not one I am comfortable having in a page mover. Some advice, which I will repeat from your own user page: slow down [your] activity because there is no deadline. You do not need to rush to obtain permissions. In fact, remember the Tortoise and the Hare story: going fast is no substitute for deliberately thinking through all your actions. You are, of course, welcome to continue to make RM closes, and make use of WP:RM/TR. I would suggest doing this and building a track record of excellent communication, and re-applying for the permission in a few months. Good luck :) Best, HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 17:55, 20 August 2024 (UTC) Understood, I will return again after working extensively in move discussions and after I improve my communication skills. Thanks for the feedback anyways. ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC) User:Iwaqarhashmi Iwaqarhashmi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I'm an active AfC reviewer, and I spend a lot of time patrolling new pages. I often draftify articles that are not sourced or need additional sources (over 250 articles so far). Having this right would be super useful and help reduce the number of R2 tags for admins in the backlog. I also have experience in WP:RM, and I'd like to request page mover rights for non-controversial tasks. Thank you, Waqar💬 16:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer (add request · view requests) User:AlexBobCharles AlexBobCharles (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I have been monitoring recent changes on pages for a while now AlexBobCharles (talk) 08:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC) Hello@AlexBobCharles. Most of your history looks good. Could you explain why you warned rather than explained after [11] this edit? Seems like a good faith error? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC) Hello . I withdraw my request because i do not plan to be very active on WP. I warned them because they seemed to be the same IP who made the same change a few hours before and got reverted and they didn't make any response to my edit summary AlexBobCharles (talk) 07:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)  Request withdrawn for bot. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC) User:Adriazeri Adriazeri (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I’ve been editing for a little while now, I’ve requested page protection and reverted edits which are not appropriate on various pages. I am pretty devoted to editing on Wikipedia and I have an extensive Watchlist so I think this permission would be useful. Adriazeri (talk) 22:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC) Hi @Adriazeri: I see you don't consistently warn vandals after you revert them. Happy to give you PCR if you commit to warning more consistently. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC) Hi there, I do apologise about not consistently warning vandals, I can absolutely commit to warning more frequently. It might’ve been because I’ve only really started using Twinkle recently. Adriazeri (talk) 12:32, 18 August 2024 (UTC)  Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 13:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC) User:MSouvik01 MSouvik01 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I've been monitoring the pages in Wikipedia for a long time. I try my best to review new changes, revert any vandalism and provide authenticity. This permission will help me review the pages more fluently. MSouvik01 (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC) Hello @MSouvik01. You don't seem to warn people consistently after reverting them. It's easy to do with WP:Twinkle. Could you commit to doing this? I also noticed that you rarely leave WP:edit summaries. It's good practice to let others know what your edit did! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC) User:TheNuggeteer TheNuggeteer (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Did all the requirements and patrolled the recent changes page for a rotating number of days. My account also meets all the requirements. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 09:38, 10 August 2024 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([12]). — MusikBot talk 09:40, 10 August 2024 (UTC) User:TheFrenchKing TheFrenchKing (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I've been creating and monitoring articles in Wikipedia for a long time and its time to a new step in this great community. TheFrenchKing (talk) 21:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC) Hi @TheFrenchKing: happy to assign PCR if you commit to WP:warning users every time you revert vandalism. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 11:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC) Hello @—Femke 🐦! I agree to follow the community guidelines on WP:warning to revert vandalism. TheFrenchKing (talk) 12:17, 18 August 2024 (UTC)  Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 12:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC) User:Tenshi Uisu Tenshi Uisu (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Here's a concise request template for pending changes reviewer rights: --- Hello, I’d like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I’ve been an active editor for a month with over 200+ edits. I understand Wikipedia’s guidelines and am committed to responsibly reviewing edits to maintain content quality. Tenshi Uisu (talk) 18:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has had an account for 23 days. — MusikBot talk 19:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Requests for rollback

Rollback (add request · view requests) User:MrBenjo MrBenjo (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hi, I am familiar with helpful tools such as SWViewer and Twinkle and use them frequently, as well as the relevant guidelines for fighting vandalism. You can see from my contribution history that I always notify the users whose edits I am reverting. Greetings, MrBenjo (talk) 20:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)  Not done I noticed you make a handful of edits, and then drop off for weeks/months at a time. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month consistently patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are always warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 08:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC) User:Tenshi Uisu Tenshi Uisu (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello, I would like to request rollback rights to help combat vandalism and maintain the quality of Wikipedia content. I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and have made over 200+ edits. My focus has primarily been on Indian television shows, vandalism patrol, content cleanup, etc. I have encountered multiple instances where rollback would have been useful to revert obvious vandalism quickly. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s rollback policy and understand that it should only be used to undo edits that are clearly unproductive. I am committed to using this tool responsibly and in line with Wikipedia's guidelines. Thank you for considering my request. Tenshi Uisu (talk) 18:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has 190 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 18:40, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for template editor.
Template editor (add request · view requests)

This dashboard (talk)