User talk:CodeTalker

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Battleboarding

I understand the reverted edits, as there is no source to give for news aggregates regarding VS Battles Wiki's internal traffic reports- I have access to these, and wanted to correct them, but if it must be reported by some other news site then this is fine. However, the page as it stands is inflammatory, in that it alleges VS Battles Wiki is inaccurate- I believe the use of the word "alleged" to be important, because the nature of the hobby the article deals in is subjective, open to interpretation. Based on the phrasing of the article, and the championing of a relatively obscure wiki as the poster child for a hobby with many more relevant communities, I believe this is an intentional misrepresentation of VS Battles Wiki (painting all other communities as "accurate" by comparison).

Is it alright, then, to re-insert "allegedly"? It aligns with the sources already provided in the page, and admittedly there are very few blogs or articles speaking on the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XeroFury (talk • contribs) 20:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@XeroFury I'll be mostly unavailable for the next few days, but I just wanted to answer this. I have no objection to re-adding the word "allegedly" as you have done. CodeTalker (talk) 03:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for your helpful intervention re the historic differences in edits on the Cody's Books page. The editor had, as you suggested, misread the differences. The edits I made are restored now and I have suggested that the part found contentious be edited by that editor themselves if they have good sources to cite. So, we have made our peace and I am grateful for the resolution. Balance person (talk) 08:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abracadabra

Hello! My name is Michael Erdman. You reverted one of my edits to a citation on the page for Abracadabra. I changed a citation on the page for a blog post from my name to the name of the actual author of the piece, Zsófi Buda. Please visit the actual blog post to see that I merely uploaded the blog to our Asian and African Blog, but that the author is clearly credited as Zsófi Buda. I would be grateful if you'd revert to my edit as this is the correct citation for the source. Thank you! 185.85.187.107 (talk) 06:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michael, I have restored your change. I notice that there is a slight discrepancy in the author's name. The blog post lists their first name as "Zsofi" but you have rendered it as "Zsófi". Which is correct? CodeTalker (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

McHale's Navy

Why did you revert my plot summaries? I spent a lot of time on these. This is for history. People want more information. Entercontainment (talk) 16:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Entercontainment, please read the documentation for {{Episode list}}. It says the ShortSummary should be "A short 100–200 word plot summary of the episode". Most of your summaries were well over 200 words. More information is not always better. The summary should be a SHORT description of the overall plot, not a scene-by-scene recounting of the whole episode. Please revert your change again or rewrite the summaries to be in conformance with the Episode list documentation. CodeTalker (talk) 17:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reinsertion of poorly sourced material

I don't know why you thought this was a good idea but it wasn't. I am re-removing the material and starting an RSN thread. I will give you a courtesy ping from there. Elinruby (talk) 03:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Special effects

Just as a heads up, the Sydney IP is a long term IP hopping disruptive editor who has been wasting their time, and ours, for many many months. Feel free to revert them on sight and if you need a block, let me know. Canterbury Tail talk 12:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Canterbury Tail, the special effects LTA (153.107.39.130 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)) has resumed editing prolifically today after your block expired. They made over 45 edits today, which are now mostly focused on adding the word "conducted" to various articles. I spot-checked five of them, and in four of those cases I did not find support in the sources for the conductor that the IP has named. I think a longer block may be warranted. CodeTalker (talk) 02:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They're an LTA who because of the number of blocks and block evasion is effectively banned under WP:3STRIKES. So any edits they make can be reverted due to the LTA. I've reverted them all and blocked again. Canterbury Tail talk 12:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Canterbury Tail it appears that the Australian "visual effects" LTA at 153.107.39.130 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has resumed editing after their last block expired. CodeTalker (talk) 03:25, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kamloops Indian Residential School

Please don't re-insert inappropriately sourced information again into Kamloops Indian Residential School like you did at Special:Diff/1229496789. Regards, TarnishedPath^talk 22:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ararat "edit war"

What is should I do in your opinion? I made an edit, it was undone because it was unsourced, then I re-intoduced it with three different sources and now it was reverted by someone claiming I use nationalist words and my sources are unreliable. I simply dont want to cause problems. Karkafs Desiderium (talk) 02:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your words in the articles history, sorry for the annoyence Karkafs Desiderium (talk) 02:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Big Fish

Hello! Thanks for being attentive to problematic edits on the Big Fish page. Another editor just reverted about 20 of my edits from the past week, and I'm wondering if you wouldn't mind giving me your thoughts on whether this was appropriate. You can view my conversation with them here.

I'm very confused, because I made the edits in what I thought was an incremental fashion and provided edit summaries for all of them. Wafflewombat (talk) 03:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your clear summary of the situation at WP:ANI#User:Radlrb_in_WP:WPM (where I cannot comment because it is semi-protected; but your clear statement covers everything I would like to have said). 100.36.106.199 (talk) 17:15, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]