User talk:Uohabacasu

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hassan Nisar Haripur (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hassan Nisar Haripur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Uohabacasu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Uohabacasu, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Hazara Waterfalls Jab Valley to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

• The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
• Articles for Creation Help Desk - ask reviewers for draft article help
• Creating your first article
• Referencing for beginners
• Wikipedia Manual of Style

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liance^talk 12:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello Liance,

Thank you for the warm welcome and for providing these helpful resources! Appreciation is expressed for your support and guidance in navigating the Wikipedia community. Excitement is felt for learning more about the editing process and contributing to the growth of the encyclopedia.

The Teahouse and other mentioned resources will be reviewed. If questions arise or assistance is needed, your talk page or the Articles for Creation Help Desk will be contacted.

Thanks again for your kindness and expertise. Anticipation is felt for continued learning and contribution to Wikipedia. Uohabacasu (talk) 16:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hazara Waterfalls Jab Valley (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hazara Waterfalls Jab Valley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hazara Waterfalls Jab Valley (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hazara Waterfalls Jab Valley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Uohabacasu. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Hassan Nisar Haripur, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hassan Nisar Haripur (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hassan Nisar Haripur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Saqib (talk I contribs) 17:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hazara Waterfalls Jab Valley (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flemmish Nietzsche was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hazara Waterfalls Jab Valley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 17:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hassan Nisar Haripur (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hassan Nisar Haripur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hassan Nisar Haripur (June 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Saqib was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I am rejecting it instead of declining because of two reasons. 1) I did a through WP:BEFORE and the BLP fails to meet GNG 2) I feel the author shall keep asking for reviews despite the fact that the subject is not WP:N as of now.

Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hassan Nisar Haripur (June 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Saqib was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I am rejecting it instead of declining because of two reasons. 1) I did a through WP:BEFORE and the BLP fails to meet GNG 2) I feel the author shall keep asking for reviews despite the fact that the subject is not WP:N as of now.

Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hazara Waterfalls Jab Valley (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hazara Waterfalls Jab Valley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Saqib (talk I contribs) 21:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hazara Waterfalls Jab Valley (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hazara Waterfalls Jab Valley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:12, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Hassan Nisar Haripur has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hassan Nisar Haripur. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 13:46, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Hazara Waterfalls Jab Valley has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hazara Waterfalls Jab Valley. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hazara Waterfalls Jab Valley

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Hazara Waterfalls Jab Valley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 15:47, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for promotional editing apparently in concert with another account and several IPs, and for ignoring feedback that you have received.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Abecedare (talk) 18:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Request for unblock: Commitment to contributing positively

Dear @Abecedare, I understand that I made mistakes, and I apologize for any disruption caused. I have reviewed Wikipedia's policies and community guidelines and have learned from my errors. I promise to contribute positively and constructively going forward. Please consider unbarring me, and I will ensure to adhere to the rules and guidelines. I would greatly appreciate a second chance to contribute to the encyclopedia without any restrictions. Thank you for considering my request.

@Saqib [[User:|UUohabacasuohabacasu]] (talk) 15:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment)

You need to format your unblock request as instructed in the block notice; otherwise it won't show up on the administrators' feed. There is little point in pinging the blocking admin, as they will usually not be the one to consider your request.

I note that you never responded to the COI query I posted here earlier (see 'Managing a conflict of interest', above). This would be a good opportunity to do that. What is your relationship with, or otherwise interest in, Hassan Nisar Haripur, Metrix Pakistan, and/or other related topics?

And last but not least, what is your relationship to user Thekhyberboypk?

Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

• Uohabacasu, I would suggest that you write a fresh {{unblock}} appeal in your own words (and not generated by an LLM):, which lays out
  1. Which policies and community guidelines you now understand that you violated?
  2. Your relation with apparent sock/meat accounts and related IPs: Thekhyberboypk (talk · contribs), 39.41.131.130 (talk · contribs), 39.41.180.193 (talk · contribs) and 39.41.181.140 (talk · contribs)?
  3. Your real-life and/or contractual relation with Hassan Nissar?
  4. And, what you plan to edit if you were to be unblocked?

Abecedare (talk) 18:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

• Policy Violations: Regarding the policies and community guidelines yes I violated I now understand that my actions were not in accordance with the Wikipedia's guidelines on sock puppetry and meatpuppetry now I realize the importance of maintaining a single, verifiable account and refraining from using multiple accounts to influence and discussions or editing.
• Relation to Accounts/IPs: I'm now confirm that I have a relation with the accounts and IPs (Thekhyberboypk, 39.41.131.130, 39.41.180.193, 39.41.181.140) mentioned because they are all mine, we are fans and editing collaboratively.
• Relation to Hassan Nisar: I have no real-life or contractual relationship with Hassan Nisar. As fans of his contributions to the region, we are appreciate his work.
• Editing Plans: If unblocked, I plan to contribute responsibly to Wikipedia, focusing on topics related to IT, Pakistani politics, and industry. Thanks Looking Forward @Abecedare@Saqib

Uohabacasu (talk) 15:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Uohabacasu , thanks for the reply but reading it does not convince me that a unblock is merited (who's "we", for example) . You are welcome to ask for another admin to review the block by posting {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Abecedare (talk) 15:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

@Abecedare Thank you for your feedback and now I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous response.. I understand your concerns regarding the use of '"we." To clarify I am the sole operator of the accounts and IPs mentioned , the use of "we" was intended to convey my association with these identities and I respectfully request another admin to review the block based on the following reasons:

• I acknowledge the policy violations related to the sock puppetry and meatpuppetry.
• I assure you of my understanding of Wikipedias guidelines and my commitment to comply with them..
• I am eager to resume contributing positively to Wikipedia particularly in areas related to IT and Pakistani politics, and industry.

I appreciate your consideration of my appeal. Uohabacasu (talk) 16:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

On the one hand, you say "I'm now confirm that I have a relation with the accounts and IPs (Thekhyberboypk, 39.41.131.130, 39.41.180.193, 39.41.181.140) mentioned because they are all mine, we are fans and editing collaboratively." But then you say regarding your use of "we": "To clarify I am the sole operator of the accounts and IPs mentioned , the use of "we" was intended to convey my association with these identities". That makes zero sense. There's either just you or there's you plus some number of other people.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing out the inconsistency in my previous statement I really apologize for the confusion and yes You are correct, I previously stated that the accounts and IPs were all mine and that I was editing collaboratively with others, but then clarified that I was the sole operator, To clarify further, I am the sole operator of the accounts and IPs mentioned, I was mistaken when I initially implied that I was editing collaboratively with others. The use of 'we' was an error on my part, and I should have been more precise in my language. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Uohabacasu (talk) 16:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Question: Given that almost the entirety of your communication here has been AI-generated, even after you were advised to make your case for unblocking in your own words, what assurance can you give that you’re even sufficiently competent in English to positively contribute to the English-language Wikipedia on any subject? --Finngall ^talk 17:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Sorry for constantly facing inconvenience by our side. Since, AI is a future, and for better sentence structure, we often take advantage from AI. As, it is prohibited according to the policy of Wikipedia, I will refrain from using it from now on.

Thanks in anticipation. Uohabacasu (talk) 17:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Uohabacasu (talk) 17:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

If you are the logged out user who is continuing to edit the Hazara Waterfalls article (and we have no reason to believe otherwise), stop it, now. YOU, the person, are blocked, not just your account(s), and continuing to edit logged out will only hurt your case for being unblocked. --Finngall ^talk 15:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

i was just see the option of edit and just add the new reference on hazara waterfalls, if there are strong references why we are not allowed to edit this beautiful place of Pakistan? Even the reference has been posted by Associated Press of Pakistan the Pakistan's government owns News. i have already told that I'm accepting the things and i will edit things on the best references based to promote good value things. Uohabacasu (talk) 15:18, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

I have revoked TPA because of your continuing to edit logged out despite the significant number of warnings on this page and your promises to comply with our policies.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:23, 21 June 2024 (UTC)