Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10 (Linea 77 album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No consensus about a redirect, but anybody is free to create one. Sandstein 15:20, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10 (Linea 77 album)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has some reviews, but not in reliable publications (except one listed, but the link wouldn't work for me). Didn't chart. Doesn't appear to meet WP:NALBUM or WP:GNG. WP:ATD would be redirect to band. Boleyn (talk) 22:18, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:31, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Linea 77: Barely found anything about the album. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG. I found very little sourcing about this album in a WP:BEFORE search I did. @ASTIG😎 I think deletion makes more sense, given that nothing indicates this obscure album is a likely search term. Newshunter12 (talk) 02:07, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Newshunter12, "10" is a generic term that is used as a name for albums, songs, bands and the likes. Some are notable, some are not. Therefore, redirecting it to the target article makes more sense since it's a valid WP:ATD. So, don't bother arguing with me. My vote stands no matter what. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 03:06, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ASTIG😎 Your hostile reply is unwarranted. If you "Barely found anything about the album", how was it unreasonable for me to point out just who is going to be searching for this, in an attempt to discus the value of a redirect vs deletion? If open, civil debate angers you, maybe you should rethink participating at AfD. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:22, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Newshunter12, anyone has the right to participate at AfDs. And so do I. So, don't stop me from doing so. Some people may vote to delete or recirect it. I voted to redirect it, and I've explained more than enough to back up my vote. So, be it. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 03:33, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.