Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 ICC Men's T20 World Cup Super 8 summary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. – Joe (talk) 09:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 ICC Men's T20 World Cup Super 8 summary

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a WP:CONTENTFORK, No encyclopedic value. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 08:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Cricket. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 08:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also this one,

Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 08:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:A10. The content is copied basically word-for-word from the main article on the 2024 World Cup. I do not think this is a plausible redirect title due to its length (and users looking for information on this round are more likely to look for the general World Cup article). There is no content needed to merge because content is already at the main article Frank Anchor 10:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A pointless WP:CFORK. AA (talk) 15:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unnecessary and pointless WP:CFORK, it is just a copy of the 2024 ICC Men's T20 World Cup. So, why should it remain? Robo^Cric Let's chat 07:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would guess these are attempted WP:SPLITs, however premature. Lean delete here for both over redirecting back as the titles do not seem like good search terms or otherwise satisfy any of the WP:RFD#KEEP criteria although I could live with a redirect back result. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:39B9:A943:564A:3BA (talk) 21:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not a valid split, no consensus to split and it's an unattributed copy of text from the main article. So should be deleted, probably by speedy deletion as either WP:A10 or WP:G12 (as unattributed copies of text violate copyright). Joseph2302 (talk) 23:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:A10. Mohammed07102007 (talk) 03:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.