Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chupke Se Bahar Ajaye

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. – Joe (talk) 13:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chupke Se Bahar Ajaye

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Existing sources are the worldcat entry for the book the show is based on, a blog episode guide, a great source for one of the actors but only passing mention for the show, one somewhat decent source that focuses on one episode and a borderline useful pre-release publicity article. There's nothing after the show was released and the show itself was short-lived. This is probably best a redirect to the novel and a short blurb about the show in that article. Ravensfire (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ravensfire (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Ravensfire (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The user "Ravenfire" reason for the deletion feels inappropriate as he has already mentioned himself that subject does have decent source, a great source of one of the cast members, the reference to the book show is based on. What else do you think should be added as a source for a TV series. He has done the same before and has nominated multiple articles for deletion as he did with Khidmat Guzar. As per my opinion the show can be improved and new references may be added to make it better but deletion is not appropriate under the circumstances. I can name a lot of articles who are in even worse condition than this article subjected to deletion, such as not even having a source but still they are on Wikipedia as main articles. Why? Lillyput4455 (talk) 01:41,7 April 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 18:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lillypu4455, please read my comment closely. The "great source" is great for the actor, but only has a passing mention for the show, meaning it is NOT a great source for this article. What's needed here are multiple sources that have significant covergage of the show. There's a super short blurb for the plot. A cast list. Really basic info in the lead. One decent source about one episode. And that's about it. Nothing post-release. I've said this multiple times before, and AFC reviewers have said this before and you've ignored it again and again. A reception section, a production section - all things with sources that would help. You've got to stop ignoring the comments from others.

And yes, there are other articles on Wikipedia worse that this one. Lots of them. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, we're talking about this article, not others. You're welcome to start AFD discussions on those articles if you'd like.Ravensfire (talk) 14:23, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.