Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diwali in Muzaffarnagar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diwali in Muzaffarnagar[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN book. UtherSRG (talk) 13:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and India. UtherSRG (talk) 13:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets criteria #1 and #2 of WP:NBOOK. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:47, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Clearly passes first and second criteria of WP:BKCRIT.

First criteria says that "The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists and reviews." and this book has been subject of 6 reviews.

Second criteria says "The book has won a major literary award." and this book is a recipient of Yuva Puraskar. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 14:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I found one more review by Pooja Pillai of The Indian Express. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 14:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I also found an article about the book in The Caravan. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 15:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Now this article has been subject of 7 reviews and 1 magazine article which are independent. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 17:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Very clearly meets WP:NBOOK criteria. -- asilvering (talk) 15:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I am not going to !vote, but I reiterate whatever I said in WT:AFC discussion. The book won Sahitya Academy award and received several National media reviews. Sometime blockd user's article too goes hard to AfDed because of the article subject's notability. Twinkle1990 (talk) 11:34, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For historical reference: User:Twinkle1990 said "Though Misterrrrr is blocked as a sockpuppet, the article Diwali in Muzaffarnagar book is not suitable for AfD as it has won notable book reviews and won Sahitya Akademi award. Sahitya Akademi books have been always been a notable whenever AfDed.For example this." in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 12:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@LordVoldemort728 yeah, the Sahitya Academy award winning books and writers are generally notable and I have stressed out to find previous AfDs similar to this always survived. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:02, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Not the most notable book but it is at least reliably referenced enough to be kept. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:43, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NBOOK #1 and #2.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.