Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elke Tsang Kai Mong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Elke Tsang Kai Mong

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find anything notable about this person outside their arrest and execution. Seems to be a case of WP:BIO1E, and WP:PERP also applies. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing notable about the person found, routine drug smuggling case. Oaktree b (talk) 15:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi there, yes i dont think this deserves its own article, please dont delete it, or the other i have created, for a few days please until i receive direction on how to remedy I think i should create an over arching article "Drug Trafficking in Singapore" and add in each of the offending articles as paragraphs, would that work ? something like this:

opening paragraph

the brief history is blah blah can be split into 2: local dealers and drug mules caught at airport

notable local drug busts

bust a arrest of offender trail verdict and sentence

notable drug mules

person a arrest trail verdict and sentence

person b arrest trail verdict and sentence

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hong Kong and Singapore. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:ONEVENT. LibStar (talk) 07:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: definitely WP:ONEEVENT, also the WP:EVENT itself is not notable and the subject does not pass the criteria "For perpetrators". -- Otr500 (talk) 02:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.