Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Garzón-Montano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per A7. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gabriel Garzón-Montano[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources to establish either WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. The page seems to be created by individuals with WP:SPA and/or WP:COI. PROD was removed without specifying any reason or justification. Coderzombie (talk) 15:51, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Coderzombie (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coderzombie (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coderzombie (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails GNG. Also add related page Jardín (album) to the nomination. Legacypac (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I had I hopes for sourcing this when I enetered this search, back when it was a WP:ProD. G-Hits include Washinton Post, New York Times, NPR, BBC. However, the links that gave me the most hope gave me disappointment in that they are blurbs and short reviews of songs and the album, w/o in depth coverage of the subject. Could not find significant coverage of the subject. So there goes WP:GNG. There is a very impressively written AllMusic page. But if you squeeze it dry and shake it out and look at it, you do not see evidence of subject meeting WP:Music. The album does not meet WP:music, has not charted on BillBoard, though a reviewer there spoke highly of the album. Almost forgot-- the cites on the page are not in depth or are from the record label, so are not helpful toward the eternal quest. Perhaps this is a case of WP:TOOSOON.Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:40, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I redirected the album page to this one for now. The promo guy is posting protests on my talk page. Legacypac (talk) 18:50, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.