Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heli Attack 2
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. no prejudice towards redirection. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Heli Attack 2[edit]
- Heli Attack 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A video game that received no reliable coverage. The entire article reads like WP:GAMEGUIDE. Beerest355 Talk 02:40, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Heli Attack (series), or Heli Attack 3 if we decide the series article isn't notable either. Ansh666 06:05, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 17:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Heli Attack (series) or Heli Attack 3 per Ansh666; article's subject does not meet WP:GNG. Miniapolis 21:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni↑talk↓ 20:54, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've nominated the series page for deletion, as well - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heli Attack (series). Ansh666 20:56, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The subject is non notable, even though text format is no a reason for delete, the article is not encyclopedic. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 13:54, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.