Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Ying Animation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus (WP:NPASR). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:53, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Ying Animation[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:ORG. Any sourcing will be in Chinese, but it's difficult to know where to look as I don't know the Chinese name of this company. If this company being a subsidiary of Wang Film Productions can be sourced, then this could probably be merged there. However, I could not source it. Adam9007 (talk) 20:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 00:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. If the unreferenced list is true, they did animate a lot of stuff, and they have decades of history. They have a number of GBooks Ghits, including in the index of this encyclopedia (but I can't confirm they have any in-depth coverage inside). They are listed in online ANN encyclopedia: [1] but I know it is half-crowdwritten, and often just bare bones. Although I am very deletionist for companies (I wrote WP:CORPSPAM), I am leaning keep here. Ping me if more sources are found, or good arguments are made for either stance. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:34, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:14, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:25, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We require minimum three independent sources for WP:ORG. Anyone who is familiar with Chinese language is welcome to update the article, however i also did a google search in Chinese too but returned with "trival mentions" and user-generated contents. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:10, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.