Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Rott
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jacob Rott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
another influencer with no substantial coverage from any reliable source FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: The GQ is a few photos with captions describing what this individual is wearing. No coverage outside of this type of photo spread/ "look what the celebrity is wearing". I don't see notability in the given sources either. Oaktree b (talk) 15:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already been through PROD. Not eligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 (talk) 14:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)- I think it is still eligible for WP:soft deletion as the edits that came after the PROD was nothing but padding with unreliable sources. FuzzyMagma (talk) 16:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Anybody can call themself an influencer, and many do. Want to get noticed? - label yourself "an influencer". If his group the Elevator Boys don't rate a Wikipedia article, the individuals therein certainly are not notable. The search brings up a lot of hits that mostly say "gained a lot of attention through their videos on the social media platform Tiktok". So? Being noticed is not the same thing as achieving awards and mainstream media coverage. — Maile (talk) 20:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.