Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalia Grosvenor, Duchess of Westminster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gerald Grosvenor, 6th Duke of Westminster. No input since relisitng, redirect seems the best alternative to deletion here. Tone 08:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Natalia Grosvenor, Duchess of Westminster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no indication in the article that the subject has received significant coverage from reliable sources independent of herself, thus failing WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. The one sentence about her activities from her family's website. The rest is all routine coverage and genealogy. Googling her reveals virtually nothing. We should not have articles on people merely for the sake of genealogy or because they hold lofty titles; the same standards of notability apply to everyone, i.e. significant coverage. Surtsicna (talk) 19:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 19:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 19:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 19:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aasim 17:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.