Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 23:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An article dedicated solely to a meeting that may or may not have happened, and also how similar the two men were. Unnecessary content fork. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 21:52, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep There is vast scholarly literature investigating the philosophical relationship between these two thinkers. This topic is beyond question notable, and the content of the article would be undue weight if merged into either of the individual articles or philosophy sub-articles (Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche and Philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard). For an example of how an article like this might develop, see Relationship between Friedrich Nietzsche and Max Stirner. Skomorokh, barbarian 22:01, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep: The IP nominator on the talk page said this article is uncited, but there are four inline references and five extra references, which is sufficient for an article that size. Also agree with the potential for growth and development. Poor Yorick (talk) 22:43, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep - valid and notable subject. See http://www.amazon.com/Either-Kierkegaard-Nietzsche-Intersections-Continental/dp/0754654745#reader_0754654745. The Transhumanist 22:49, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.