Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V-Nasty
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted. Non-admin closure. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
V-Nasty[edit]
- V-Nasty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Should be speedied, but history has shown it is easier to just AFD since they bothered to have an info box. Not notable, no info. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:12, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete-No need for an AfD; all you had to do was tag it for deletion, which I've done under the A1 section on the CSD-24.107.242.3 (talk) 20:22, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- History has shown me that many admin's do not like to delete under A1 or A7 if there is an infobox. I'm not sure why, but that rationale has been given to me on A1s in particular. I've had several kicked out for that exact reason. I agree with you, but just decided to bring it here, as I'm not in a hurry and hate seeing my CSDs kicked out on technical grounds. Won't break my heart if the admin at the switch just CSDs it. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:25, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.