Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 June 19

< June 18	June 20 >

June 19

File:RCA Bluebird 78 B-11230-B Glenn Miller.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 June 28. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:RCA Bluebird 78 B-11230-B Glenn Miller.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stjohn-grand-priors-badge.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is not necessarily own work in the design, which is most likely held by the issuing organisation. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:20, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom: No evidence of own work. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:06, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arthur Kampf - Knabe in Rot (1907).JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FFD referral, as it's apparently un-sourced. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:44, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The source field in the info template isn't filled in but the source information is provided in the description. The photo was taken by the uploader at the Alte Nationalgalerie in Berlin. -- Whpq (talk) 01:49, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - Source infromation was present. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:12, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wiki-kobi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Available on Commons at higher resolution, though with a different (and probably equally spurious) claim of authorship/ownership. However, I plan to nominate that for deletion also, as there's no evidence of permission from the photographer, nor indication of who that was. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:05, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Firesign Theatre Farm Hippies no. 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#9. Stefan2 (talk) 16:50, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:

Does not fail NFCC#9: it only appears in mainspace article. What else is wrong with its location?
NFCC#8 is subjective; this photo significantly increases readers' understanding of the article topic by providing visual identification of two of the Firesigns' wives who performed with them; its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. JustinTime55 (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to include pictures of the wives as this isn't an article about the wives. There is no sourced critical commentary about what the wives looked like. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:13, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Omission would not be detrimental to the reader's understand of the article topic. There is no need to visually identify the associate Firesigns. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CashConvertersLogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No source. The uploader didn't specify how to verify that this is the logo of the company. The company's website has a different logo. Stefan2 (talk) 16:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Apparently a historical logo as evidence by the official website and the other images in the article. The use of historical logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the historical logo itself is described in the context of critical commentary about that historical logo. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:13, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ulsan Flag.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 June 28. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:49, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulsan Flag.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AltaicLanguagesAccurate.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A POV map. Whereas this user, who seems to be a POV pusher, wanted to cancel the bias by removing color from areas populated by Kurds they did a really poor job by completely ignoring many Turkic populated areas, for example in Crimea and elsewhere in Europe. Ymblanter (talk) 17:03, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#7 --Baerentp (talk) 20:16, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gandalara-Map.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Generic but copyrighted fantasy map. WP:NFCC failure. Not necessary to understand the article. Sandstein 21:28, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#7 (article redirected). — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As it does not satisfy WP:NFCC#7 --Baerentp (talk) 20:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.