Xavier Rouard

This interdisciplinary study allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5.000 BCE and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 Y-DNA from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin, as the macrohaplogroup F and the haplogroup H Y-DNA could appear in India, as well as haplogroup C Y-DNA, found in Vinča, and Central Asian haplogroups F, K, P, Q Y-DNA were found in Europe at significant levels from Serbia and Croatia to France and Great Britain, which pleads for a Central Asian origin of Gauls, Celts and Balkan peoples.

This interdisciplinary study allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5,000 BCE and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin, as macrohaplogroup F and haplogroup H Y-DNA could appear in India, as well as haplogroup C Y-DNA, found in Vinča, and Central Asian haplogroups F, K, P, Q Y-DNA were found in Europe at significant frequencies from Serbia and Croatia to France and Great Britain, which pleads for a Central Asian origin of Gauls, Celts and Balkan peoples.

In this short paper, I will sum up the ten main reasons why Central Asia was the PIE original homeland, on the basis of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANS-EURASIAN ORIGINAL LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH 03-24, first published in Scientific culture in 2022, available on Academia and ResearchGate.

Dix raisons pour lesquelles l'Asie Centrale devait être le foyer originel des Indo-Européens, Gaulois et peuples des Balkans Dans ce court papier, je résumerai les dix raisons pour lesquelles l'Asie centrale devait être le foyer originel des indo-Européens, Gaulois et peuples des Balkans sur la base de mon étude LES LANGUES INDO-EUROPEENNES SONT-ELLES ISSUES D'UNE LANGUE ORIGINELLE TRANS-EURASIENNE ? UNE APPROCHE INTERDISCIPLINAIRE 01-24, publiée initialement en 2022 dans Scientific culture, disponible sur Academia et ResearchGate.

In this short paper, I will sum up the ten main reasons why Central Asia was the PIE original homeland, on the basis of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANS-EURASIAN ORIGINAL LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH 03-24, first published in Scientific culture in 2022, available on Academia and ResearchGate.

Xavier ROUARD
Born 16/04/1961 in Paris
Studies: University of Rouen, Slavic languages (Alumnus)
Rouen Business School (Alumnus)
Diplomat, linguist, independent researcher
Introduction
I am currently working on the origins of Gauls. I established linguistic links between Gauls, Slavs, Dravidians and Burushos, corroborated by genetic, archaeological and religious data. I am interested by contacts with researchers working on the origin of Neolithic Europe and its links with Anatolia, the Caucasus, Sumer, Iran, Central Asia and India. My work was published on Sciences-Faits-Histoires.com, Academia letters and Scientific Culture (https://sci-cult.com/wp-content/uploads/8.1/8_1_2_ Rouard. pdf).
Disciplines
Philology, History of Linguistics, History of History, History of Religion, Archaeology
Skills and expertise
Prehistoric Archaeology, Neolithic, South Asian Studies, Indo-European Linguistics, Celtic Studies, Comparative Linguistics, Ancient DNA Analysis, Historical Linguistics, Central Asia & Caucasus, Prehistory, Areal Linguistics, Neolithic Archaeology, Anthropological Linguistics, Philology, History of History, History of Religion, History of Linguistics
Languages
English, German, Russian, Polish, Czech, Slovak, Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian, Georgian, French, Albanian

Dix raisons pour lesquelles l'Asie Centrale devait être le foyer originel des Indo-Européens, Gaulois et peuples des Balkans : Dans ce court papier, je résumerai les dix raisons pour lesquelles l'Asie centrale devait être le foyer originel des indo-Européens, Gaulois et peuples des Balkans sur la base de mon étude LES LANGUES INDO-EUROPEENNES SONT-ELLES ISSUES D'UNE LANGUE ORIGINELLE TRANS-EURASIENNE ? UNE APPROCHE INTERDISCIPLINAIRE 01-24, publiée initialement en 2022 dans Scientific culture, disponible sur Academia et ResearchGate.

This interdisciplinary study allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5.000 BCE and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 Y-DNA from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin, as the macrohaplogroup F and the haplogroup H Y-DNA could appear in India, as well as haplogroup C Y-DNA, found in Vinča, and Central Asian haplogroups F, K, P, Q Y-DNA were found in Europe at significant levels from Serbia and Croatia to France and Great Britain, which pleads for a Central Asian origin of Gauls, Celts and Balkan peoples.

In this short paper, I will sum up the ten main reasons why Central Asia was the PIE original homeland, on the basis of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANS-EURASIAN ORIGINAL LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH 03-24, first published in Scientific culture in 2022, available on Academia and ResearchGate.

This interdisciplinary study allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5,000 BCE and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin, as macrohaplogroup F and haplogroup H Y-DNA could appear in India, as well as haplogroup C Y-DNA, found in Vinča, and Central Asian haplogroups F, K, P, Q Y-DNA were found in Europe at significant frequencies from Serbia and Croatia to France and Great Britain, which pleads for a Central Asian origin of Gauls, Celts and Balkan peoples.

In this short paper, I will sum up the ten main reasons why Central Asia was the PIE original homeland, on the basis of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANS-EURASIAN ORIGINAL LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH 01-24, first published in Scientific culture in 2022, available on Academia and ResearchGate.

In this short paper, I will sum up the six main reasons why Central Asia was the PIE original homeland, on the basis of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANS-EURASIAN ORIGINAL LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH 01-24, published in Scientific culture, available on Academia and ResearchGate. 1/ Linguistics; 2/ Genetics; 3/ Archaeology; 4/ Religion; 5/ Spread of agriculture and pastoralism; 6/ Trade routes

Avant-propos : J'ai retrouvé cette biographie au jour du tragique anniversaire des deux ans de la guerre cruelle menée par Vladimir Poutine en Ukraine et ai décidé de la publier en hommage aux victimes. Slava Ukraini !
Foreword : I came upon this biography in my archives on the day of the tragic anniversary of the cruel war les by Vladimir Putin in Ukraine and decided to publish it in honour of victims. Slava Ukraini.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate the correspondences between Gaulish and Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, also allowed me to demonstrate, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological and religious data, that these matches were linked with Neolithic expansion of agriculture and pastoralism from North-Western India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkanic Europe, and farther to Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers took part in the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed from 5.000 BC. This explains the linguistic matches I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations Néolithiques d’Inde et du Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés (et 160 avec le bourouchaski), et les similitudes constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune très ancienne.

This interdisciplinary study allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5,000 BCE and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin, as the macrohaplogroup F and the haplogroup H could appear in India.

This interdisciplinary study allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5.000 BCE and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin, as the macrohaplogroup F and the haplogroup H could appear in India.

Que penser du nouveau ChatGPT de Bing ? Exemple des Indo-Européens J'ai testé le nouveau ChatGPT de Bing en lui posant des questions sur l'origine de la langue gauloise, des langues des Balkans, des langues indo-européennes et des peuples liés. Les résultats sont globalement satisfaisants, même si les réponses sont d'intérêt inégal. Elles sont également une bonne surprise pour moi, car mes papiers sont largement recommandés. Je suis preneur de vos commentaires.

La véritable histoire d'Astérix le Gaulois et des peuples des Balkans de l'Asie centrale vers l'Europe Sur la base de mon étude LES LANGUES INDO-EUROPEENNES SONT-ELLES ISSUES D'UNE LANGUE ORIGINELLE TRANSEURASIENNE ? UNE APPROCHE INTERDISCIPLINAIRE, publiée dans Scientific Culture en janvier 2022 et sur mes profils sur Academia et ResearchGate, je vais vous raconter la véritable histoire des migrations d'Astérix le Gaulois et des peuples des Balkans de l'Asie centrale vers l'Europe.

On the basis of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANSEURASIAN LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, published in Scientific Culture in January 2022 and on my profiles on Academia and RG, I will relate you the true story of Astérix the Gaul and Balkan peoples from Central Asia to Europe. 1/ Linguistic studies According to Kassian (2021), Eurasian languages stem from an original Eurasian language, which included Samoyedic languages and split between 18,000 and 8,000 BCE. This is consistent with Pagel-Atkinson (2013), postulating that the seven language families of Eurasia form a linguistic superfamily which evolved from a common ancestor around 15,000 years ago, with a homeland in Central Asia, from which Dravidian, Kartvelian and Basque were the first to separate, followed by PIE around 8,700 years ago, which contradicts the theory of Kurgans, postulating a later formation of PIE. There are two main theories for the peopling of Europe and the formation of Indo-European languages. The conventional theory of Kurgans places the original homeland of Indo-European languages in the Pontic steppes around 5,000 BCE. An alternative theory links the formation of Indo-European languages to the arrival of agriculture in Europe from Anatolia around 8,000 to 9,500 years ago. This theory seems to me more suitable to explain the formation of archaic Balkan languages, and more globally of archaic European languages. Albanian would for instance be linked to Hittite from Anatolia. The formation of Indo-European in this region could be also attested by the interesting Burushaski language of Northern Pakistan which, according to Witzel (2012) mixes features from Dravidian, Sanskrit and Caucasian languages and shares the vigesimal numeration with Dravidian, Caucasian, Basque and Celtic, which left traces in French (vimsati, twenty in Dravidian, could even have given vingt, twenty in French). Greenhill (2012) places Burushaski between Kannada, a Dravidian language, Hindi, Caucasian languages and Basque, which supports its archaic character. Mosenkis also underlines the links of Burushaski, which he considers as very archaic, with Sino-Caucasian and Indo-European languages as Armenian, Phrygian and paleo-Balkan languages. Boc et al. (2010) underlines the links between Celtic and Indo-Iranian, Slavic and Indo-Iranian, and Slavic and Celtic, considering that this may be the evidence of a much closer common ancestry between these language families than generally thought or of an intensive migration of the ancestors of the involved nations.

La véritable histoire d'Astérix le Gaulois et des peuples des Balkans de l'Asie centrale vers l'Europe Sur la base de mon étude LES LANGUES INDO-EUROPEENNES SONT-ELLES ISSUES D'UNE LANGUE ORIGINELLE TRANSEURASIENNE ? UNE APPROCHE INTERDISCIPLINAIRE, publiée dans Scientific Culture en janvier 2022 et sur mes profils sur Academia et RG, je vais vous raconter la véritable histoire des migrations d'Astérix le Gaulois et des peuples des Balkans de l'Asie centrale vers l'Europe.

On the basis of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANSEURASIAN LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, published in Scientific Culture in January 2022 and on my profiles on Academia and RG, I will relate you the true story of Asterix the Gaul and Balkan peoples from Central Asia to Europe. 1/ Linguistic studies According to Kassian (2021), Eurasian languages stem from an original Eurasian language, which included Samoyedic languages and split between 18,000 and 8,000 BC. This is consistent with Pagel-Atkinson (2013), postulating that the seven language families of Eurasia form a linguistic superfamily which evolved from a common ancestor around 15,000 years ago, with a homeland in Central Asia, from which Dravidian, Kartvelian and Basque were the first to separate, followed by PIE around 8,700 years ago, which contradicts the theory of Kurgans, postulating a much later formation of PIE. There are two main theories for the peopling of Europe and the formation of Indo-European languages. The conventional theory of Kurgans places the original homeland of Indo-European languages in the Pontic steppes around 6.000 BC. An alternative theory links the formation of Indo-European languages to the arrival of agriculture in Europe from Anatolia 8.000 to 9.500 years ago. This theory seems to me more suitable to explain the formation of archaic Balkan languages, and more globally of archaic European languages. Albanian would for instance be linked to Hittite from Anatolia. The formation of Indo-European in this region could be also attested by the interesting Burushaski language of Northern Pakistan which, according to Witzel (2012) mixes features from Dravidian, Sanskrit and Caucasian languages and shares the vigesimal numeration with Dravidian, Caucasian, Basque and Celtic, which left traces in French (vimsati, twenty in Dravidian, could even have given vingt, twenty in French). Greenhill (2012) places Burushaski between Kannada, a Dravidian language, Hindi, Caucasian languages and Basque, which supports its archaic character. Mosenkis also underlines the links of Burushaski, which he considers as very archaic, with Sino-Caucasian and Indo-European languages as Armenian, Phrygian and paleo-Balkan languages. Boc et al. (2010) underlines the links between Celtic and Indo-Iranian, Slavic and Indo-Iranian, and Slavic and Celtic, considering that this may be the evidence of a much closer common ancestry between these language families than generally thought or of an intensive migration of the ancestors of the involved nations. Horvath (2021) affirms that Burushaski was the first language spoken on the Iranian plateau before being replaced by Elamo-Dravidian and later Indo-European, which tends to confirm the anteriority of Burushaskirecently dated back to 16.000 BC-and the theory that Burushaski, as Elamo-Dravidian, contributed to the formation of Indo-European languages. My theory is also coherent with links established by Copeland (2021) between Indo-Europeans, Altaic and Uralic peoples, Akkadians and Hittites, pleading according to him for a migration of pastoralists by the South from Altay to Ireland.

In this short paper, I will sum up the findings of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANSEURASIAN LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, published in Scientific Culture in January 2022 and on my profiles on Academia and ResearchGate. 1/ Linguistic studies According to Kassian (2021), Eurasian languages stem from an original Eurasian language, which included Samoyedic languages and split between 18,000 and 8,000 BC. This is consistent with Pagel-Atkinson (2013), postulating that the seven language families of Eurasia form a linguistic superfamily which evolved from a common ancestor around 15,000 years ago, with a homeland in Central Asia, from which Dravidian, Kartvelian and Basque were the first to separate, followed by PIE around 8,700 years ago, which contradicts the theory of Kurgans, postulating a much later formation of PIE.

Asie centrale : le foyer originel commun du gaulois et des langues des Balkans Dans ce papier, je résumerai les conclusions de mon étude LES LANGUES INDO-EUROPEENNES SONT-ELLES ISSUES D'UNE LANGUE ORIGINELLE TRANSEURASIENNE ? UNE APPROCHE INTERDISCIPLINAIRE, publiée dans Scientific Culture en janvier 2022 et sur mes profils sur Academia et ResearchGate. 1/ Etudes linguistiques Selon Kassian (2021), les langues eurasiennes sont issues d'une langue eurasienne originelle, qui incluait les langues samoyèdes et s'est séparée entre-18.000 et-8.000. Cela est cohérent avec Pagel-Atkinson (2013), postulant que les sept familles linguistiques eurasiennes forment une macro-famille linguistique qui a évolué d'un ancêtre commun il y a environ 15.000 ans, dont le foyer originel était situé en Asie centrale et duquel le dravidien, le kartvélien et la basque se sont séparé en premiers, suivis de l'Indo-européen il y a environ 8.700 ans, ce qui contredit la théorie des Kourganes, qui postule une formation bien plus récente du PIE.

Asie centrale : le foyer originel commun du gaulois et des langues des Balkans Dans ce papier, je résumerai les conclusions de mon étude LES LANGUES INDO-EUROPEENNES SONT-ELLES ISSUES D'UNE LANGUE ORIGINELLE TRANSEURASIENNE ? UNE APPROCHE INTERDISCIPLINAIRE, publiée dans Scientific Culture en janvier 2022 et sur mes profils sur Academia et ResearchGate. 1/ Etudes linguistiques Selon Kassian (2021), les langues eurasiennes sont issues d'une langue eurasienne originelle, qui incluait les langues samoyèdes et s'est séparée entre-18.000 et-8.000. Cela est cohérent avec Pagel-Atkinson (2013), postulant que les sept familles linguistiques eurasiennes forment une macro-famille linguistique qui a évolué d'un ancêtre commun il y a environ 15.000 ans, dont le foyer originel était situé en Asie centrale et duquel le dravidien, le kartvélien et la basque se sont séparé en premiers, suivis de l'Indo-européen il y a environ 8.700 ans, ce qui contredit la théorie des Kourganes, qui postule une formation bien plus récente du PIE.

In this short paper, I will sum up the findings of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANSEURASIAN LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, published in Scientific Culture in January 2022 and on my profiles on Academia and ResearchGate.
1/ Linguistic studies According to Kassian (2021), Eurasian languages stem from an original Eurasian language, which included Samoyedic languages and split between 18,000 and 8,000 BC. This is consistent with Pagel-Atkinson (2013), postulating that the seven language families of Eurasia form a linguistic superfamily which evolved from a common ancestor around 15,000 years ago, with a homeland in Central Asia, from which Dravidian, Kartvelian and Basque were the first to separate, followed by PIE around 8,700 years ago, which contradicts the theory of Kurgans, postulating a much later formation of PIE.

In this short paper, I will sum up the findings of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANS-EURASIAN LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, published in Scientific Culture in January 2022 and on my profiles on Academia and ResearchGate.

Dans ce court papier, je résumerai les conclusions de mon étude LES LANGUES INDO-EUROPEENNES SONT-ELLES ISSUES D’UNE LANGUE ORIGINELLE TRANSEURASIENNE ? UNE APPROCHE INTERDISCIPLINAIRE, publiée dans Scientific Culture en janvier 2022 et sur mes profils sur Academia et ResearchGate.
For English speakers, an English version can be found at https://www.academia.edu/91416612/DID_INDO_EUROPEAN_LANGUAGES_STEM_FROM_A_TRANS_EURASIAN_LANGUAGE_AN_INTERDISCIPLINARY_APPROACH_SUMMARY_OF_FINDINGS

In this short paper, I will sum up the findings of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANS-EURASIAN LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, published in Scientific Culture in January 2022 and on my profiles on Academia and ResearchGate. Please refer to my original study https://www.academia.edu/90159677/DID_INDO_EUROPEAN_LANGUAGES_STEM_FROM_A_TRANS_EURASIAN_ORIGINAL_LANGUAGE_AN_INTERDISCIPLINARY_APPROACH_LES_LANGUES_INDO_EUROPEENNES_SONT_ELLES_ISSUES_DUNE_LANGUE_ORIGINELLE_TRANS_EURASIENNE_UNE_APPROCHE_INTERDISCIPLINAIRE for more details.

In memoriam of my father, Jean-Claude Rouard, recently deceased, I publish his article about links between Gauls, Galatians, Vlachs, Valachians and Aromanians, which shows close links between these peoples which contributed to the peopling of the Balkans and Central Europe. Although it wasn't published, I would be glad if it would be read and perpetuate the memory of my deceased father, as his article inspired me in my own research.

This short paper, summarizing the conclusions of findings of my long study https://www.academia.edu/74067043/DID_INDO_EUROPEAN_LANGUAGES_STEM_FROM_A_TRANS_EURASIAN_ORIGINAL_LANGUAGE_AN_INTERDISCIPLINARY_APPROACH_LES_LANGUES_INDO_EUROPEENNES_SONT_ELLES_ISSUES_DUNE_LANGUE_ORIGINELLE_TRANS_EURASIENNE_UNE_APPROCHE_INTERDISCIPLINAIRE, which was peer-reviewed and published in Scientific Culture, was submitted to Academia Letters. Although it wasn't accepted, I thank all reviewers who recommended its publication. In response to critics of reviewers, I want to stress that all references can be found in my long study, as well as further linguistic and genetic evidence supporting my theory.

In my study The Odyssey of Gauls and Slavs from North-Western India to Europe, I conclude, on the basis of linguistic, genetic and archaeological studies that the peopling of Europe took place from N-W India, Pakistan, Iran, the Caucasus and Anatolia, creating a proto-Indo-Mediterranean culture.

Extract :this study, which first aim was to demonstrate the correspondences between Gaulish and Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, also allowed me to demonstrate, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological and religious data, that these matches were linked with Neolithic expansion of agriculture and pastoralism from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkanic Europe, and farther to Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers took part in the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed from 5.000 BC. This explains the linguistic matches I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin. Extrait : cette étude, dont l'objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j'ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m'a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations Néolithiques d'Inde et du Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l'Iran, la Mésopotamie, l'Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l'Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l'Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s'est développée à partir de-5.000. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j'ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes-250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés (et 160 avec le bourouchaski), et les similitudes constatées dans l'organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2-P96 de l'Inde à l'Europe de l'Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune très ancienne. XXX On retrouve de nombreuses racines communes entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, et notamment les langues slaves du Sud, ainsi que le lituanien et le slavon, langues proto-slaves, attestant des liens étroits entre les Gaulois et le monde slave ancien, que je détaillerai dans un premier temps en vue de démontrer que les concordances linguistiques que je présente dans la seconde partie de cette étude sont fondées.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate the correspondences between the Gaulish language and the Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, also allowed me to demonstrate, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological and religious data, that these correspondences were linked with Neolithic migrations from North-Western India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkanic Europe, to Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic agriculturalists contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed from -5.000. This explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations Néolithiques d’Inde et du Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés (et 160 avec le bourouchaski), et les similitudes constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune très ancienne.

- There are two main theories for the peopling of Europe and the formation of Indo-European languages. The conventional theory of Kurgans, places the original homeland of Indo-European languages in the Pontic steppes around 6.000 BC. An alternative theory links the formation of Indo-European languages to the arrival of agriculture in Europe from Anatolia 8.000 to 9.500 years ago. This theory seems to me to be more suitable to explain the formation of archaic Balkan languages, and more globally of archaic European languages.
- I conclude from my study that the archaic Balkan languages, as Gaulish, formed on the basis of the most archaic Indo-European languages as Burushaski and Kalash of the Pamir, and Dravidian, which spread from  Central Asia to the Caucasus and Anatolia and contributed to the formation of Indo-European languages, as attested by the presence of 250 Dravidian and 160 Burushaski words among the 500 words common to Slavic and Gaulish found in my study, and even one hundred Dravidian words close to French, as well as grammatical similarities as the interrogative  particle da, employed in Dravidian, Burushaski and BSCM, and the article le, common to Burushaski, several Balkan languages and French. That attests of very ancient links between Gaulish and archaic Indo-European languages of the Balkans, which go back at least to the civilisation of Vinča, which language was already proto-Slavic.

Central Asia, at the crossroad of these influences, appears as a serious candidate as homeland of the ancestor of Indo-European, Dravidian and Ibero-Caucasian languages, of which Burushaski, probably coming from Altay to Pamir, bringing Altaic linguistic elements and haplogroups R1a and R1b, which appeared in Southern Siberia and spread to Europe, would be an archaic remnant, as Kalasha, archaic Indo-Aryan language of the Pamir. This spread is attested by archaeological discoveries dated from the Gravettian in Altay, Pamir and Uzbekistan, according to Marcel Otte. This migration brought haplogroup R1b in Italy (14.000 BC), France (12.000 BC) and Serbia (11.000 BC) and was at the origin of the pyramids of Visoko in Bosnia-Herzegovina according to Marc-Olivier Rondu (The Epigravettian pipelines of Visoko (Bosnia-Herzegovina), on Academia). The alleged Pamirian origin of haplogroup L-M20, carried by 15% of the Burushos and 25% of the Kalash, found in the Caucasus and in Southern Europe, as the Pamirian origin of Bulgarian genes, according to a study of Slavian Stoilov, and the proximity of the genes of Pamirian Tajiks and Europeans according to Evelyne Heyer also plead in this direction, as the presence of features of Pamirian languages in Thracian, Bulgarian, Macedonian, Albanian and Aromanian, language of Vlachs, as bac, sheepfold in Burushaski, bacija in Balkan languages, zamiina, earth in Burushaski, close to zemlja, earth in Slavic. That could explain that the name of Zalmoxis, Thracian Grand Priest considered as the founder of Druidism, would come from Dravidian. The presence even in modern French of words close to Burushaski linked to pastoralism and agriculture (terre, earth, close to ter, mountain pasture, bélier, ram, close to belis, ewe, lamb, bouc, he-goat, close to buc, he-goat, charrue, plow, close to har, plow, pomme, apple, close to phamol, fruit), to family (maman, mother, close to mama, mother, papa, father, close to bapo, father, fils, fille, son, daughter, close to pilili, child), to human body (cœur, heart, close to guru, heart, bouche, mouth, close to buk, throat), feu, fire, close to phu, fire, servir, serve, close to ser, serve, je, I, close to je, I, and ja, I in Slavic, le, the, close to le, the, and articles found in Balkan languages, as the presence in Gaulish, French and Slavic of many Dravidian and Burushaski words quoted in my study, undoubtedly plead for a migration linked to the expansion of pastoralism and agriculture from Central Asia and the confines of India to the Balkans and Gaul at the Neolithic, also attested by the arrival in France of goats carrying Central Asian genes around 5.000 BC, which brought to Europe an archaic proto-Indo-European language, mixing features of the most archaic Indo-European languages of India and Anatolia, Dravidian, Altaic and Ibero-Caucasian languages and taking part in the formation of Indo-European languages, of which Burushaski, classified by the famous linguist Eric Hamp as the most archaic Indo-European language linked to Indo-Hittite, is a remnant.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate the correspondences between the Gaulish language and the Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, also allowed me to demonstrate, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological and religious data, that these correspondences were linked with Neolithic migrations from North-Western India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkanic Europe, to Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic agriculturalists contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed from -5.000. This explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations Néolithiques d’Inde et du Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés (et 160 avec le bourouchaski), et les similitudes constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate the correspondences between the Gaulish language and the Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, also allowed me to demonstrate, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological and religious data, that these correspondences were linked with Neolithic migrations from North-Western India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkanic Europe, to Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic agriculturalists contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed from -5.000. This explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations Néolithiques depuis l’Inde et le Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés, et les similitudes constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate the correspondences between the Gaulish language and the Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, also allowed me to demonstrate, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological and religious data, that these correspondences were linked with Neolithic migrations from North-Western India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkanic Europe, to Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic agriculturalists contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed from -5.000. This explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations Néolithiques depuis l’Inde et le Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés, et les similitudes constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune.

this study, which first aim was to demonstrate the correspondences between the Gaulish language and the Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, also allowed me to demonstrate, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological and religious data, that these correspondences were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkanic Europe, to Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic agriculturalists contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed from-5.000. This explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin. Extrait : cette étude, dont l'objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j'ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m'a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations Néolithiques depuis l'Inde et le Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l'Iran, la Mésopotamie, l'Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l'Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l'Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s'est développée à partir de-5.000. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j'ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes-250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés, et les similitudes constatées dans l'organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2-P96 de l'Inde à l'Europe de l'Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune. XXX On retrouve de nombreuses racines communes entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, et notamment les langues slaves du Sud, ainsi que le lituanien et le slavon, langues proto-slaves, attestant des liens étroits entre les Gaulois et le monde slave ancien, que je détaillerai dans un premier temps en vue de démontrer que les concordances linguistiques que je présente dans la seconde partie de cette étude sont fondées. Ces concordances peuvent s'expliquer en premier lieu par le fait que, selon des études récentes, basées sur les dernières découvertes de la génétique, la moitié des Européens actuels descendraient des cavaliers des steppes de la culture Yamna qui,

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate the correspondences between the Gaulish language and the Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, also allowed me to demonstrate, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological and religious data, that these correspondences were linked with Neolithic migrations from North-Western India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkanic Europe, to Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic agriculturalists contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed from -5.000. This explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations  Néolithiques depuis l’Inde et le Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés, et les similitudes constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate correspondences between Gaulish and Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, allowed me also to establish, on the basis of genetical, archaeological and religious data, that those correspondences were linked with ancient migrations which spread the Dravidian civilisation of the Indus Valley to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers brought about 30% of the French genetic profile and contributed to the development of the megalithic civilisation which began in 5.000 BC. This also explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and the religion, which lead various researchers to suggest, on the basis of the diffusion of the very ancient haplogroup H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations anciennes qui ont apporté environ 30% du profil génétique français et  diffusé la civilisation dravidienne de la vallée de l’Indus vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont apporté environ 30% du profil génétique français et contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique aussi les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés, et les similitudes que j’ai constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate correspondences between Gaulish and Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, allowed me also to establish, on the basis of genetical, archaeological and religious data, that those correspondences were linked with ancient migrations which spread the Dravidian civilisation of the Indus Valley to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers brought about 30% of the French genetic profile and contributed to the development of the megalithic civilisation which began in 5.000 BC. This also explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and the religion, which lead various researchers to suggest, on the basis of the diffusion of the very ancient haplogroup H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations anciennes qui ont apporté environ 30% du profil génétique français et  diffusé la civilisation dravidienne de la vallée de l’Indus vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont apporté environ 30% du profil génétique français et contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique aussi les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés, et les similitudes que j’ai constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate correspondences between Gaulish and Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, allowed me also to establish, on the basis of genetical, archaeological and religious data, that those correspondences were linked with ancient migrations which spread the Dravidian civilisation of the Indus Valley to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers brought about 30% of the French genetic profile and contributed to the development of the megalithic civilisation which began in 5.000 BC. This also explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and the religion, which lead various researchers to suggest, on the basis of the diffusion of the very ancient haplogroup H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations anciennes qui ont apporté environ 30% du profil génétique français et  diffusé la civilisation dravidienne de la vallée de l’Indus vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont apporté environ 30% du profil génétique français et contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique aussi les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés, et les similitudes que j’ai constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune.

This study, which first aim was to demonstrate correspondences between Gaulish and Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, allowed me also to establish, on the basis of genetical, archaeological and religious data, that those correspondences were linked with ancient migrations which spread the Dravidian civilisation of the Indus Valley to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers brought about 30% of the French genetic profile and contributed to the development of the megalithic civilisation which began in 5.000 BC. This also explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and the religion, which lead various researchers to suggest, on the basis of the diffusion of the very ancient gene H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations anciennes qui ont apporté environ 30% du profil génétique français et  diffusé la civilisation dravidienne de la vallée de l’Indus vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique aussi les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés, et les similitudes que j’ai constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du gène très ancien H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate the correspondences between the Gaulish language and the Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, allowed me also to demonstrate, on the basis of genetical, archaeological and religious data, that those correspondences were linked with ancient migrations linked with the diffusion of the Dravidian civilisation of the Indus Valley to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkanic Europe, towards Gaul and Iberia, where the Neolithic agriculturalists contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed from -5.000. This explains also the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and the religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the diffusion of the very ancient gene H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations anciennes liées à la diffusion de la civilisation dravidienne de la vallée de l’Indus vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique aussi les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés, et les similitudes que j’ai constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du gène très ancien H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate the correspondences between the Gaulish language and the Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, allowed me also to demonstrate, on the basis of genetical, archaeological and religious data, that those correspondences were linked with ancient migrations linked with the diffusion of the Dravidian civilisation of the Indus Valley to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkanic Europe, towards Gaul and Iberia, where the Neolithic agriculturalists contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed from -5.000. This explains also the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and the religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the diffusion of the very ancient gene H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations anciennes liées à la diffusion de la civilisation dravidienne de la vallée de l’Indus vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique aussi les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés, et les similitudes que j’ai constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du gène très ancien H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate the correspondences between the Gaulish language and the Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, allowed me also to demonstrate, on the basis of genetical, archaeological and religious data, that those correspondences were linked with ancient migrations linked with the diffusion of the Dravidian civilisation of the Indus Valley to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkanic Europe, towards Gaul and Iberia, where the Neolithic agriculturalists contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed from -5.000. This explains also the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and the religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the diffusion of the very ancient gene H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations anciennes liées à la diffusion de la civilisation dravidienne de la vallée de l’Indus vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique aussi les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés, et les similitudes que j’ai constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du gène très ancien H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate the correspondences between the Gaulish language and the Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, allowed me also to demonstrate, on the basis of genetical, archaeological and religious data, that those correspondences were linked with ancient migrations linked with the diffusion of the Dravidian civilisation of the Indus Valley to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkanic Europe, towards Gaul and Iberia, where the Neolithic agriculturalists contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed from -5.000. This explains also the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and the religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the diffusion of the very ancient gene H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations anciennes liées à la diffusion de la civilisation dravidienne de la vallée de l’Indus vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique aussi les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés, et les similitudes que j’ai constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du gène très ancien H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate correspondences between Gaulish and Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, allowed me also to establish, on the basis of genetical, archaeological and religious data, that those correspondences were linked with ancient migrations which spread the Dravidian civilisation of the Indus Valley to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers brought about 30% of the French genetic profile and contributed to the development of the megalithic civilisation which began in 5.000 BC. This also explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and the religion, which lead various researchers to suggest, on the basis of the diffusion of the very ancient gene H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations anciennes qui ont apporté environ 30% du profil génétique français et  diffusé la civilisation dravidienne de la vallée de l’Indus vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique aussi les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés, et les similitudes que j’ai constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du gène très ancien H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune.

This interdisciplinary study allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5.000 BCE and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 Y-DNA from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin, as the macrohaplogroup F and the haplogroup H Y-DNA could appear in India, as well as haplogroup C Y-DNA, found in Vinča, and Central Asian haplogroups F, K, P, Q Y-DNA were found in Europe at significant levels from Serbia and Croatia to France and Great Britain, which pleads for a Central Asian origin of Gauls, Celts and Balkan peoples.

This interdisciplinary study allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5,000 BCE and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin, as macrohaplogroup F and haplogroup H Y-DNA could appear in India, as well as haplogroup C Y-DNA, found in Vinča, and Central Asian haplogroups F, K, P, Q Y-DNA were found in Europe at significant frequencies from Serbia and Croatia to France and Great Britain, which pleads for a Central Asian origin of Gauls, Celts and Balkan peoples.

This interdisciplinary study allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5,000 BCE and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin, as the macrohaplogroup F and the haplogroup H could appear in India, as well as haplogroup C, found in Vinča.

This interdisciplinary study allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5.000 BCE and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin, as the macrohaplogroup F and the haplogroup H could appear in India, as well as haplogroup C, found in Vinča.

In this short paper, I will sum up the findings of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANSEURASIAN LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, published in Scientific Culture in January 2022 and on my profiles on Academia and ResearchGate.

This interdisciplinary study allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5.000 BC and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had an ancient common origin, as macrohaplogroups F and K, from which stem all European haplogroups, as well as haplogroup H, could appear in India. Cette étude interdisciplinaire m'a permis de démontrer, sur la base de données linguistiques, génétiques, archéologiques, historiques et religieuses, que les correspondances linguistiques entre le gaulois et le slave étaient liées à des migrations Néolithiques d'Inde et du Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l'Iran, la Mésopotamie, l'Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l'Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l'Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s'est développée en Gaule à partir de-5.000 et apporté une langue archaïque issue d'une langue originelle trans-eurasienne. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j'ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes-250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés (et 160 avec le bourouchaski), ainsi qu'avec les langues altaïques, ouraliennes, karvéliennes, anatoliennes et moyen-orientales. Cela explique aussi les similitudes constatées dans l'organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplo-groupe H2 P-96 de l'Inde à l'Europe de l'Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune très ancienne, les macro-haplo-groupes F et K, desquels descendent tous les haplo-groupes européens, ainsi que l'haplo-groupe H, ayant pu apparaitre en Inde.

This interdisciplinary study allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from North-Western India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5.000 BC and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had an ancient common origin, as macrohaplogroups F and K, from which stem all European haplogroups, as well as haplogroup H, could appear in India.
Cette étude interdisciplinaire m’a permis de démontrer, sur la base de données linguistiques, génétiques, archéologiques, historiques et religieuses, que les correspondances linguistiques entre le gaulois et le slave étaient liées à des migrations Néolithiques d’Inde et du Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée en Gaule à partir de -5.000 et apporté une langue archaïque issue d’une langue originelle trans-eurasienne. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés (et 160 avec le bourouchaski), ainsi qu’avec les langues altaïques, ouraliennes, karvéliennes, anatoliennes et moyen-orientales. Cela explique aussi les similitudes constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplo-groupe H2 P-96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune très ancienne, les macro-haplo-groupes F et K, desquels descendent tous les haplo-groupes européens, ainsi que l’haplo-groupe H, ayant pu apparaitre en Inde.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate the correspondences between the Gaulish language and the Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, also allowed me to demonstrate, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological and religious data, that these correspondences were linked with Neolithic migrations from North-Western India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkanic Europe, to Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic agriculturalists contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed from -5.000. This explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin. Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations Néolithiques d’Inde et du Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés (et 160 avec le bourouchaski), et les similitudes constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune très ancienne.

On retrouve de nombreuses racines communes entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, et notamment les langues slaves du Sud, ainsi que le lituanien et le slavon, langues proto-slaves, attestant des liens étroits entre les Gaulois et le monde slave ancien, que je détaillerai dans un premier temps en vue de démontrer que les concordances linguistiques que je présente dans la seconde partie de cette étude sont fondées. Ces concordances peuvent s'expliquer en premier lieu par le fait que, selon les études les plus récentes, basées sur les dernières découvertes de la génétique, près de la moitié des Européens actuels descendent des cavaliers des steppes de la culture Yamna qui, venus du Caucase et de l'Iran, voire de l'Altaï, du Pamir ou de l'Hindou-Kouch, se sont installés dans les steppes du Sud de la Russie et de l'Ukraine au contact de populations sédentaires proto-slaves, dont celles de la culture de Cucuteni-Tripolje (qui serait d'origine dravidienne, comme celles de Vinča, Butmir et Visoko). La culture Yamna est génétiquement liée aux 3/4 à celles de la céramique cordée et de la hache de combat, qui se sont diffusées de la Russie aux Pays baltes, à la Pologne, la République tchèque et la Slovaquie, l'Allemagne et la Gaule. Ces cultures sont à l'origine de toutes les langues indo-européennes et des peuples slaves, celtes et germaniques, ce qui explique les similarités du gaulois avec le slave et l'indo-européen. Plusieurs études récentes corroborent en outre la thèse évoquée de longue date par des historiens français selon laquelle les Gaulois descendent des Cimmériens (kymru signifiant compatriote en gaulois), issus des civilisations Yamna et Srubna (qui se sont succédées). Les Thraces, proches des Cimmériens, les Illyriens, les Sarmates et les Vénètes sont également originaires du Nord de la Mer Noire. Vers-5.000, les ancêtres des Indo-européens occidentaux, dont les Ligures (dont le nom viendrait du dravidien gori, montagne) et les Gaulois, ont construit un empire en Ukraine, Russie du Sud-Est, Moldavie, Roumanie et Carpates. La tribu gauloise des Boudins est même restée sur les bords du Don. Tous ces peuples ont poursuivi leur migration, certains vers la Pologne (Vénètes), d'autres vers la région danubienne, où ils se sont joints à la civilisation de Hallstatt (Celtes, Cimmériens, Illyriens et Vénètes), d'autres vers les Balkans (Thraces et Illyriens), d'autres vers l'Anatolie (Thraces, Cimmériens, Vénètes et Celtes). Chassés d'Anatolie, les Cimmériens, Celtes et Vénètes ont poursuivi leur migration vers la Gaule. Ce n'est toutefois qu'à la fin de l'âge du bronze, vers-1.500, que la civilisation de Hallstatt et des champs d'urnes a commencé à se diffuser de la région du Danube vers la Gaule, ce qui pose la question de l'origine de la civilisation mégalithique qui s'est épanouie en Gaule à partir de-5.000. Diverses études apportent des éléments de réponse à cette question, dont une étude de l'UNESCO, qui évoque des migrations d'Asie vers l'Europe au 7 ème millénaire av. J. C., et une étude de l'Université de Toronto, qui explique la proximité avec le sanskrit des langues slaves archaïques, tel le vieux slavon (lié au vieux bulgare) et le slovène, par des contacts très anciens. Cette proximité, que l'on retrouve en gaulois, peut s'expliquer par l'apport au gaulois des Vénètes, dont les Slovènes sont issus et dont le nom serait issu du sanskrit vind, connu, familier, selon cette étude. S. Zaborowski, dans L'origine des Slaves, souligne les liens très étroits des Vénètes avec les Gaulois dès la naissance de la civilisation de Hallstatt, puis en Gaule, en Italie du Nord, en Bohème, en Pannonie et en Illyrie, où les Gaulois n'étaient entourés que de Slaves et se sont fondus dans la population locale. Une étude roumaine souligne aussi les liens très anciens de la civilisation pélasgienne carpato-danubienne avec les Indo-Aryens védiques, antérieurs à la civilisation des kourganes. Une autre étude souligne les similitudes entre le dravidien, les langues caucasiennes, le roumain, l'albanais, l'étrusque et les langues ibériques. André de Paniagua, dans plusieurs ouvrages, conforte cette thèse en suggérant que les Celtes et les Vénètes seraient en partie issus de Dravidiens venus de l'Inde primitive, qui se serait mêlés aux peuples des steppes venus de l'Altaï pour s'installer en premier lieu dans le Caucase et au Nord de la Mer Noire et former la culture des kourganes, et poursuivre ensuite leur migration vers la région danubienne et les Balkans, puis l'Europe occidentale, où ils auraient diffusé la culture mégalithique dravidienne. Il évoque à cet égard la diffusion de l'Inde au Caucase, aux Balkans, à l'Italie et à la Bretagne, des termes dravidiens vel, vin, blanc (beli en sl. c., balaros, vindos en gaulois), et kar, kara, noir (crni en sl. c.), que l'on…

Central Asia, at the crossroad of these influences, appears as a serious candidate as homeland of the ancestor of Indo-European, Dravidian and Ibero-Caucasian languages, of which Burushaski, probably coming from Altay to Pamir, bringing Altaic linguistic elements and haplogroups R1a and R1b, which appeared in Southern Siberia and spread to Europe, would be an archaic remnant, as Kalasha, archaic Indo-Aryan language of the Pamir. This spread is attested by archaeological discoveries dated from the Gravettian in Altay, Pamir and Uzbekistan, according to Marcel Otte. This migration brought haplogroup R1b in Italy (14.000 BC), France (12.000 BC) and Serbia (11.000 BC) and was at the origin of the pyramids of Visoko in Bosnia-Herzegovina according to Marc-Olivier Rondu (The Epigravettian pipelines of Visoko (Bosnia-Herzegovina), on Academia). The alleged Pamirian origin of haplogroup L-M20, carried by 15% of the Burushos and 25% of the Kalash, found in the Caucasus and in Southern Europe, as the Pamirian origin of Bulgarian genes, according to a study of Slavian Stoilov, and the proximity of the genes of Pamirian Tajiks and Europeans according to Evelyne Heyer also plead in this direction, as the presence of features of Pamirian languages in Thracian, Bulgarian, Macedonian, Albanian and Aromanian, language of Vlachs, as bac, sheepfold in Burushaski, bacija in Balkan languages, zamiina, earth in Burushaski, close to zemlja, earth in Slavic. That could explain that the name of Zalmoxis, Thracian Grand Priest considered as the founder of Druidism, would come from Dravidian. The presence even in modern French of words close to Burushaski linked to pastoralism and agriculture (terre, earth, close to ter, mountain pasture, bélier, ram, close to belis, ewe, lamb, bouc, he-goat, close to buc, he-goat, charrue, plow, close to har, plow, pomme, apple, close to phamol, fruit), to family (maman, mother, close to mama, mother, papa, father, close to bapo, father, fils, fille, son, daughter, close to pilili, child), to human body (cœur, heart, close to guru, heart, bouche, mouth, close to buk, throat), feu, fire, close to phu, fire, servir, serve, close to ser, serve, je, I, close to je, I, and ja, I in Slavic, le, the, close to le, the, and articles found in Balkan languages, as the presence in Gaulish, French and Slavic of many Dravidian and Burushaski words quoted in my study, undoubtedly plead for a migration linked to the expansion of pastoralism and agriculture from Central Asia and the confines of India to the Balkans and Gaul at the Neolithic, also attested by the arrival in France of goats carrying Central Asian genes around 5.000 BC, which brought to Europe an archaic proto-Indo-European language, mixing features of the most archaic Indo-European languages of India and Anatolia, Dravidian, Altaic and Ibero-Caucasian languages and taking part in the formation of Indo-European languages, of which Burushaski, classified by the famous linguist Eric Hamp as the most archaic Indo-European language linked to Indo-Hittite, is a remnant.

Extract :this study, which first aim was to demonstrate the correspondences between Gaulish and Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, also allowed me to demonstrate, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological and religious data, that these matches were linked with Neolithic expansion of agriculture and pastoralism from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkanic Europe, and farther to Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers took part in the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed from 5.000 BC. This explains the linguistic matches I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin. Extrait : cette étude, dont l'objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j'ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m'a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations Néolithiques d'Inde et du Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l'Iran, la Mésopotamie, l'Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l'Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l'Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s'est développée à partir de-5.000. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j'ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes-250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés (et 160 avec le bourouchaski), et les similitudes constatées dans l'organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2-P96 de l'Inde à l'Europe de l'Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune très ancienne. XXX On retrouve de nombreuses racines communes entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, et notamment les langues slaves du Sud, ainsi que le lituanien et le slavon, langues proto-slaves, attestant des liens étroits entre les Gaulois et le monde slave ancien, que je détaillerai dans un premier temps en vue de démontrer que les concordances linguistiques que je présente dans la seconde partie de cette étude sont fondées.

This study, which first aim was to demonstrate correspondences between Gaulish and Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, allowed me also to establish, on the basis of genetical, archaeological and religious data, that those correspondences were linked with ancient migrations which spread the Dravidian civilisation of the Indus Valley to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danuban and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the development of the megalithic civilisation which began in 5.000 BC. This also explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and the religion, which lead various researchers to suggest, on the basis of the diffusion of the very ancient gene H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin. Cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations anciennes qui ont diffusé la civilisation dravidienne de la vallée de l’Indus vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique aussi les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés, et les similitudes que j’ai constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du gène très ancien H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune.

In my study The Odyssey of Gauls and Slavs from North-Western India to Europe, I conclude, on the basis of linguistic, genetic and archaeological studies that the peopling of Europe took place from N-W India, Pakistan, Iran, the Caucasus and Anatolia, creating a proto-Indo-Mediterranean culture.

This interdisciplinary study allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5.000 BC and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had an ancient common origin, as macrohaplogroups F and K, from which stem all European haplogroups, and haplogroup H could appear in India.

This interdisciplinary study allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5.000 BC and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had an ancient common origin, as the macrohaplogroups F and K, from which stem all European haplogroups, and the haplogroup H could appear in India.
Cette étude interdisciplinaire m’a permis de démontrer, sur la base de données linguistiques, génétiques, archéologiques, historiques et religieuses, que les correspondances linguistiques entre le gaulois et le slave étaient liées à des migrations Néolithiques d’Inde et du Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les
agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée en Gaule à partir de -5.000 et apporté une langue archaïque issue d’une langue originelle trans-eurasienne. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés (et 160 avec le bourouchaski), ainsi qu’avec les langues altaïques,
ouraliennes, karvéliennes, anatoliennes et moyen-orientales. Cela explique aussi les similitudes constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la
diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2 P-96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune très ancienne, les macro-haplogroupes F et K, desquels
descendent tous les haplogroupes européens, et l’haplogroupe H ayant pu apparaitre en Inde.

Cette étude interdisciplinaire m’a permis de démontrer, sur la base de données linguistiques, génétiques, archéologiques, historiques et religieuses, que les correspondances linguistiques entre le gaulois et le slave étaient liées à des migrations Néolithiques d’Inde et du Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée en Gaule à partir de -5.000 et apporté une langue archaïque issue d’une langue originelle trans-eurasienne. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés (et 160 avec le bourouchaski), ainsi qu’avec les langues altaïques, ouraliennes, karvéliennes, anatoliennes et moyen-orientales. Cela explique aussi les similitudes constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2 P-96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune très ancienne, le macrohaplogroupe F et l’haplogroupe H ayant pu apparaitre en Inde.

This interdisciplinary study, published in Scientific Culture,  allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from North-Western India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5.000 BC and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin, as the macrohaplogroup F and the haplogroup H could appear in India.

This interdisciplinary study, published in Scientific Culture, journal supported by the European Academy of Sciences and Arts, allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5.000 BC and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin, as the macrohaplogroup F and the haplogroup H could appear in India.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate the correspondences between the Gaulish language and the Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, also allowed me to demonstrate, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological and religious data, that these correspondences were linked with Neolithic migrations from North-Western India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkanic Europe, to Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic agriculturalists contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed from -5.000. This explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations Néolithiques d’Inde et du Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés (et 160 avec le bourouchaski), et les similitudes constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune très ancienne.

Abstract : this study, which first aim was to demonstrate correspondences between Gaulish and Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, allowed me also to establish, on the basis of genetical, archaeological and religious data, that those correspondences were linked with ancient migrations which spread the Dravidian civilisation of the Indus Valley to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers brought about 30% of the French genetic profile and contributed to the development of the megalithic civilisation which began in 5.000 BC. This also explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and the religion, which lead various researchers to suggest, on the basis of the diffusion of the very ancient haplogroup H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin.
Extrait : cette étude, dont l’objectif initial était de démontrer les correspondances entre le gaulois et les langues slaves, entre lesquelles j’ai trouvé 500 mots communs, m’a en outre permis de démontrer, sur la base de données génétiques, archéologiques et religieuses, que ces correspondances étaient liées à des migrations anciennes qui ont apporté environ 30% du profil génétique français et  diffusé la civilisation dravidienne de la vallée de l’Indus vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont apporté environ 30% du profil génétique français et contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée à partir de -5.000. Cela explique aussi les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés, et les similitudes que j’ai constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2-P96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune.

This study, which first aim was to demonstrate correspondences between Gaulish and Slavic languages, between which I found 500 common words, allowed me also to establish, on the basis of genetical, archaeological and religious data, that those correspondences were linked with ancient migrations which spread the Dravidian civilisation of the Indus Valley to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubian and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers brought about 30% of the French genetic profile and contributed to the development of the megalithic civilisation which began in 5.000 BC. This also explains the linguistic correspondences I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages – 250 common words from the 500 words I studied, as well as similarities I found in the organisation of the Society and the religion, which lead various researchers to suggest, on the basis of the diffusion of the very ancient gene H2-P96 from India to Western Europe, that the first Europeans and the proto-Dravidians had a common origin.

Prague, 1984 : un jeune homme ordinaire, Harry, arrive dans une ville où Orwell aurait pu situer l’action de son célèbre roman « 1984 » pour y travailler à l’Ambassade de France. Le StB, Big Brother tchécoslovaque satellite du KGB russe, qui envisage de le recruter comme agent des services secrets communistes, le soumet à une surveillance digne de la STASI est-allemande dans « la vie des autres », en vue, comme la STASI le fait avec le jeune Allemand de l’Est Martin dans la série « Deutschland 83 », de l’infiltrer au sein de l’OTAN afin d’en savoir plus sur les plans supposés d’attaque nucléaire de l’OTAN en cette période de regain de la guerre froide liée à l’arrivée au pouvoir de Ronald Reagan.

Prague, 1984: an ordinary young man, Harry, arrives in a city where Orwell could have located the action of his famous novel "1984" to work at the Embassy of France. The StB, the Czechoslovakian Big Brother satellite of the Russian KGB, which plans to recruit him as an agent of the communist secret services, submits him to a similar surveillance as the East German STASI in "the lives of others", in view, like the STASI with the young East German Martin in the "Deutschland 83" series, to infiltrate NATO in order to find out more about NATO's supposed plans for nuclear attack during this period, which saw a revival of the Cold War as Ronald Reagan came to power.
This book tells the true story of Harry, based on the files made on him by the StB. As in the book of Gilles Perrault, "Dossier 51", it describes the investigation carried out by the Czechoslovak Communist Secret Service on Harry with a view to recruiting him as a secret agent for political intelligence purposes by directing him to a target related to NATO. It reproduces exhaustive facsimiles of the main documents of this file, and in particular the conclusions of the StB survey and the proposed recruitment plan, as well as a spinning report. It questions the motivation of the StB to mount an abortive recruitment operation on Harry, and among others the specific interest of the communist secret services for France. It strives to better understand the motives of the agents involved in Operation Harry by investigating their profile through their files. The author's access to the secret archive of the StB, which was only opened in 2007, allows him to present an exceptional testimony of StB methods, less known to the public than those of the KGB and STASI, of sinister memory.
This book also studies the troubled game of these services in the popular revolts that have marked the history of the communist bloc, from events in Budapest in 1956 to the Prague Spring of 1968, the spring of Solidarność in 1981 in Poland and the Velvet revolutions of 1989 which precipitated its fall.
Finally, it evokes the deep imprint left by the communist system throughout the former Soviet bloc, and in this respect provides keys to better understand the evolution of the countries of the former Eastern bloc since 1989, which is not without raising increasingly worrying issues for instance in Putin's Russia and in North Korea. The horrible war launched by Putin in Ukraine gives an eloquent example of the consequences of this ideology, which Putin turned from a cold war to a hot war or even a genocide, as we can see in Mariupol. 
I therefore wish that the Western public will be interested in this work of investigation and memory, necessary to better understand countries we now have the opportunity to deal with for most of them within the framework of the European Union and NATO.
I hope finally that the Bosnian public will be interested in the presentation of methods which also left a deep imprint in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Prague, 1984: an ordinary young man, Harry, arrives in a city where Orwell could have located the action of his famous novel "1984" to work at the Embassy of France. The StB, the Czechoslovakian Big Brother satellite of the Russian KGB, which plans to recruit him as an agent of the communist secret services, submits him to a similar surveillance as the East German STASI in "the lives of others", in view, like the STASI with the young East German Martin in the "Deutschland 83" series, to infiltrate NATO in order to find out more about NATO's supposed plans for nuclear attack during this period, which saw a revival of the Cold War as Ronald Reagan came to power.
This book tells the true story of Harry, based on the files made on him by the StB. As in the book of Gilles Perrault, "Dossier 51", it describes the investigation carried out by the Czechoslovak Communist Secret Service on Harry with a view to recruiting him as a secret agent for political intelligence purposes by directing him to a target related to NATO. It reproduces exhaustive facsimiles of the main documents of this file, and in particular the conclusions of the StB survey and the proposed recruitment plan, as well as a spinning report. It questions the motivation of the StB to mount an abortive recruitment operation on Harry, and among others the specific interest of the communist secret services for France. It strives to better understand the motives of the agents involved in Operation Harry by investigating their profile through their files. The author's access to the secret archive of the StB, which was only opened in 2007, allows him to present an exceptional testimony of StB methods, less known to the public than those of the KGB and STASI, of sinister memory.
This book also studies the troubled game of these services in the popular revolts that have marked the history of the communist bloc, from events in Budapest in 1956 to the Prague Spring of 1968, the spring of Solidarność in 1981 in Poland and the Velvet revolutions of 1989 which precipitated its fall.
Finally, it evocates the deep imprint left by the communist system throughout the former Soviet bloc, and in this respect provides keys to better understand the evolution of the countries of the former Eastern bloc since 1989, which is not without raising increasingly worrying issues for instance in Putin's Russia and in North Korea. The horrible war launched by Putin in Ukraine gives an eloquent example of the consequences of this ideology, which Putin turned from a cold war to a hot war or even a genocide, as we can see in Mariupol. 
I therefore wish that the Western public will be interested in this work of investigation and memory, necessary to better understand countries we now have the opportunity to deal with for most of them within the framework of the European Union and the NATO.
I hope finally that the Bosnian public will be interested by the presentation of methods which also let a deep imprint in Bosnia and Herzegovina.