Andreas Nymark

Mortuary behavior (activities concerning dead conspecifics) is one of many traits that were previously widely considered to have been uniquely human, but on which perspectives have changed markedly in recent years. Theoretical approaches to hominin mortuary activity and its evolution have undergone major revision, and advances in diverse archeological and paleoanthropological methods have brought new ways of identifying behaviors such as intentional burial. Despite these advances, debates concerning the nature of hominin mortuary activity, particularly

Nubian Levallois technology has recently risen to the forefront of debates surrounding Late Pleistocene human technological behavior, cultural traditions, and demographic histories. Named after the region where it was first identified, Nubian Levallois describes a specific method of lithic point production that occurs in Middle Palaeolithic (or Middle Stone Age) assemblages across arid North Africa, the Levant and Arabia. However, the recent identification of Nubian technology in separate, disconnected regions, such as South Africa and possibly India suggests there are more diverse scenarios of its emergence and spread than the original model of a broad Nubian technocomplex related to a single, expanding population from its north‐east African heartland. While few assemblages containing Nubian technology are directly dated, its proposed MIS 5 timing coincides with early modern human dispersals out of Africa, adding a further dimension of whether certain lithic technologies can be linked to specific geographic populations.

Currently, advancing this debate is hindered by having neither an accepted definition of what constitutes Nubian technology, nor a consensus on its role in modern human cultural evolution and population dynamics. To address this, 22 archaeologists met for an international workshop with two aims: (1) refining the definition of the Nubian technological method and how it can be identified in assemblages; and (2) re‐evaluating the relation- ship between Nubian technology as a reduction strategy and the Nubian Complex as a cultural entity in the context of current evidence. The specialist group of lithic analysts brought expertise in relevant assemblages—particularly those where Nubian technology forms a prominent component—from across Africa, the Levant and Arabia, contributing a diverse range of approaches and perspectives to this salient debate.

This paper presents evidence for some of the highest-altitude Middle Palaeolithic land-use in southwest Asia identified through field surveys in the Miankouh region of the Bakhtiari highlands within the Zagros Mountains of Iran. Through identification of two vertically connected but distinct ecozones, patterned distribution of stone tool production and use suggests more complex seasonal mobility and land-use patterns than hitherto recognised.