История России с древнейших времен до XXI века: проблемы, дискуссии, новые взгляды: сборник статей участников Междунар. научно-практической школы-конференции молодых ученых (24–25 ноября 2020 г.) / [отв. ред. : Ю.А. Петров, В.Н. Круглов]. - Москва: Институт российской истории РАН, 2020.
На основании актовых источников в статье анализируются особенности управления светскими лицами пр... more На основании актовых источников в статье анализируются особенности управления светскими лицами православным Коложским монастырем незадолго до заключения Брестской церковной унии, уточняется список настоятелей обители. В середине XVI в. борьба за инвеституру духовенства монастыря велась между королевой Боной Сфорца и ее сыном Сигизмундом II Августом. Каждый из них считал себя обладателем права поставления архимандритов и назначения светских опекунов монастыря. В приложении публикуются две грамоты из состава книг Литовской метрики, проливающие свет на историю управления монастырем в этот период.
On the basis of act sources this article examines the peculiarities of administration of Sts. Boris and Gleb Orthodox Kolozha Monastery by the laity shortly before the formation of the Church Union of Brest, the list of superiors of this religious house is ascertained. In the mid-16th century struggle for the monastery clergy investiture was waged between Queen Bona Sforza and her son Sigismund II Augustus. Each of them deemed herself/himself to be the holder of the right to enthrone archimandrites and appoint laic guardians of the monastery. Two charters from the books of the Lithuanian Metrica throwing light on the history of administration of Sts. Boris and Gleb Monastery during that period are published in annex to this article.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
This article is concerned with the source study analysis of the genealogical libel on the Sukins’ family which was introduced into scholarly discourse by N. P. Likhachyov back then but so far has not become the subject matter of a special research. Besides establishing the degree of reliability of that work and the circle of written sources used by its compiler, a number of tasks are addressed to reconstruct the history of the Sukins family who were members of the monarchic court in the 16th – 17th centuries. Land connections are analyzed to find out the origin of this family; the identity and matrimonial relations of its members are ascertained; the position of the Sukins and their relatives is determined in the occupational status hierarchy of Muscovy; the course of the mestnichestvo- based proceedings in 1663–1664 is restored between Duma Clerk S. I. Zaborovsky and Okolnichy O. I. Sukin which proceedings, perhaps, triggered the creation of the genealogical libel. Published in appendices are the pamyats of the Razryadny Prikaz and the Posolsky Prikaz related to the mestnichestvo- based dispute of 1663–1664, as well as the Sukins’ genealogical table for the late-15th – 17th century.
In this work the following phenomena understudied in historiography are researched: foundation, operation, and decline of allodial monasteries. It is supposed that the spread of such ancestral pilgrimages was considerably wider than it has been thought in the literature before now. They did not grow into significant landowner monasteries, by and large. The research of these phenomena is achievable by using source study methods, including the analysis of toponymy and of the cadaster, deed, and cartography sources. The opportunities of such approach are demonstrated through the example of a short history of the Bulgak Monastery in the Principality of Ryazan. The localization of that monastery within the one-third domain of Prince Fyodor Vasilievich enabled to identify his churchwarden as Matvey Denisievich Bulgak Yuriev whose varieties of fortune explain the reasons for a quick decline of that religious house.
This article is concerned with source analysis of the allodial archives of one of the branches of Netshi’s family. Contrary to the information of Russian family registers, Mikhail Dmitrievich Sharap, Alexander Netshi’s descendant in the fourth generation, who at the close of the XV century went together with prince Vasily Vereysky to live in Lithuania, left issue behind him which is viewed in the sources of the XVI–XVIII centuries.
Mikhail Sharap served in Lithuania to other princes of the Moscow house: Ivan and Feodor Yaroslavich. The tribal cognomen of Sharap Bakanovsky was secured for his descendants; starting in the second quarter of the XVI century they were in service with grand dukes of Lithuania and kings of Poland and became fully assimilated in the Polish and Lithuania gentry world. Published in a supplement are Cyrillic charters of 1507–1589 addressed by the apanage and grand princes of Lithuania to the representatives of this branch of the Netshis.
This article is concerned with studying a copy of the second testament of Prince Dmitry Donskoy which has not been previously introduced into the scientific practice and is extant as part of one of the books within the Lithuanian Metrica. A hypothesis is advanced that the origin of this copy is linked to the princes of Vereya who escaped from their domain to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania at the end of the XV century. This article contains the description and publication of the manuscript.
The emigration of Russian princes and service class people to Lithuania is a grand-scale but still poorly studied phenomenon of the sociopolitical history of the XV–XVI centuries. Sporadic references in the genealogical records about the departure and childless decease of a service man are at times the only known source of information about the Muscovite emigrant’s life. Data about his offsprings were not included in the ancestral memory patterns either through ignorance or by virtue of certain ideological attitudes, however the resort to record sources enables to replenish substantially the scope of knowledge about the afterlife of any runaway. The biography of Boris Ignatievich Obraztsov – one of Andrei Kobyla’s descendants, who emigrated to Lithuania in the mid-1500s – is reconstructed in this article. The ways to restore information on his career building, possessions formation and also marriage-and-family connections of his son Lev Obraztsov-Goshchevsky who was on the side of his grandfather S.А. Chartoryisky a direct descent from Grand Duke of Lithuania Gediminas and Ivan II are also being outlined in this paper.
This article presents a considerably broader concept of the term “Queen Bona’s Metrica”, setting out the guidelines for further reconstruction of Bona Sforza’s chancery; there is a brief description of the chronology and geography of documents contained in Lithuanian Metrica Books of Inscriptions No. 18, 32, 33 and 36, mentioning their type, authorship and
content of the more important documents, and a comprehensive discussion of sources of particular interest to historians of Russian history. Entering into polemics with colleagues from abroad and taking into account their own and others’ experiences, the article’s authors present their opinion on the archaeographical requirements for contemporary historical source publications in the academic sciences in Russia; they discuss issues relating to the publication of duplicates of the Lithuanian Metrica complex being released by other archaeography centres. There is a comprehensive description of the principles for the structure, content, how the text should be presented and formation of the academic-informative elements that were applied in the publication of the first volume of “Queen Bona’s Metrica” in Moscow in 2018, and which should be realised in new releases of the books and acts of the Lithuanian Metrica being prepared for printing by the Institute of Russian History.
On the basis of act sources this article examines the peculiarities of administration of Sts. Boris and Gleb Orthodox Kolozha Monastery by the laity shortly before the formation of the Church Union of Brest, the list of superiors of this religious house is ascertained. In the mid-16th century struggle for the monastery clergy investiture was waged between Queen Bona Sforza and her son Sigismund II Augustus. Each of them deemed herself/himself to be the holder of the right to enthrone archimandrites and appoint laic guardians of the monastery. Two charters from the books of the Lithuanian Metrica throwing light on the history of administration of Sts. Boris and Gleb Monastery during that period are published in annex to this article.
The boundary Usvyaty Volost for a long time was the subject matter of disputes in diplomatic negotiations between Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Muscovite state. From the late 1520s to the mid 1550s the Usvyaty and Ozerishcha Volosts belonged to queen Bona Sforza. The Lithuanian Metrica contains copies of some ustavnaya gramotas issued by the queen to the local population. After the conquest of Polotsk and Ozerishcha in 1563–1564, the Moscow part insisted on the Usvyaty Volost belonging to the Polotsk Povet. As one of the arguments in favor of its territorial ambitions, the ambassadors referred to certain gramotas of Bona brought out to Moscow. The references to them are contained in the list of the Tsar Archives of the 1570s. The contents of the queen’s ustavniy lists which never were demonstrated to the Lithuanian ambassadors contradicted the Moscow diplomats’ testimonies. This article concentrates on the review of the references to queen Bona’s gramotas in the Russian-Lithuania diplomatic correspondence of the XVI century, identification of their copies existing in the Lithuanian Metrica, and an attempt to reconstruct the contents of the ‘Box 227’ in the Tsar Archives where the originals of these documents formerly could be kept.
This article is concerned with analyzing the documents of the Usvyaty Volost history in the first half of the XVI century which are contained in Queen Bona’s Metrica and other sources. In this work the problem of dating some of Queen Bona’s charters is considered, the questions of administrative and territorial belonging, governance, and taxation of this frontier region on the eve of the Livonian War are studied.
This article is concerned with the source study analysis of the genealogical libel on the Sukins’ family which was introduced into scholarly discourse by N. P. Likhachyov back then but so far has not become the subject matter of a special research. Besides establishing the degree of reliability of that work and the circle of written sources used by its compiler, a number of tasks are addressed to reconstruct the history of the Sukins family who were members of the monarchic court in the 16th – 17th centuries. Land connections are analyzed to find out the origin of this family; the identity and matrimonial relations of its members are ascertained; the position of the Sukins and their relatives is determined in the occupational status hierarchy of Muscovy; the course of the mestnichestvo- based proceedings in 1663–1664 is restored between Duma Clerk S. I. Zaborovsky and Okolnichy O. I. Sukin which proceedings, perhaps, triggered the creation of the genealogical libel. Published in appendices are the pamyats of the Razryadny Prikaz and the Posolsky Prikaz related to the mestnichestvo- based dispute of 1663–1664, as well as the Sukins’ genealogical table for the late-15th – 17th century.
In this work the following phenomena understudied in historiography are researched: foundation, operation, and decline of allodial monasteries. It is supposed that the spread of such ancestral pilgrimages was considerably wider than it has been thought in the literature before now. They did not grow into significant landowner monasteries, by and large. The research of these phenomena is achievable by using source study methods, including the analysis of toponymy and of the cadaster, deed, and cartography sources. The opportunities of such approach are demonstrated through the example of a short history of the Bulgak Monastery in the Principality of Ryazan. The localization of that monastery within the one-third domain of Prince Fyodor Vasilievich enabled to identify his churchwarden as Matvey Denisievich Bulgak Yuriev whose varieties of fortune explain the reasons for a quick decline of that religious house.
This article is concerned with source analysis of the allodial archives of one of the branches of Netshi’s family. Contrary to the information of Russian family registers, Mikhail Dmitrievich Sharap, Alexander Netshi’s descendant in the fourth generation, who at the close of the XV century went together with prince Vasily Vereysky to live in Lithuania, left issue behind him which is viewed in the sources of the XVI–XVIII centuries.
Mikhail Sharap served in Lithuania to other princes of the Moscow house: Ivan and Feodor Yaroslavich. The tribal cognomen of Sharap Bakanovsky was secured for his descendants; starting in the second quarter of the XVI century they were in service with grand dukes of Lithuania and kings of Poland and became fully assimilated in the Polish and Lithuania gentry world. Published in a supplement are Cyrillic charters of 1507–1589 addressed by the apanage and grand princes of Lithuania to the representatives of this branch of the Netshis.
This article is concerned with studying a copy of the second testament of Prince Dmitry Donskoy which has not been previously introduced into the scientific practice and is extant as part of one of the books within the Lithuanian Metrica. A hypothesis is advanced that the origin of this copy is linked to the princes of Vereya who escaped from their domain to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania at the end of the XV century. This article contains the description and publication of the manuscript.
The emigration of Russian princes and service class people to Lithuania is a grand-scale but still poorly studied phenomenon of the sociopolitical history of the XV–XVI centuries. Sporadic references in the genealogical records about the departure and childless decease of a service man are at times the only known source of information about the Muscovite emigrant’s life. Data about his offsprings were not included in the ancestral memory patterns either through ignorance or by virtue of certain ideological attitudes, however the resort to record sources enables to replenish substantially the scope of knowledge about the afterlife of any runaway. The biography of Boris Ignatievich Obraztsov – one of Andrei Kobyla’s descendants, who emigrated to Lithuania in the mid-1500s – is reconstructed in this article. The ways to restore information on his career building, possessions formation and also marriage-and-family connections of his son Lev Obraztsov-Goshchevsky who was on the side of his grandfather S.А. Chartoryisky a direct descent from Grand Duke of Lithuania Gediminas and Ivan II are also being outlined in this paper.
This article presents a considerably broader concept of the term “Queen Bona’s Metrica”, setting out the guidelines for further reconstruction of Bona Sforza’s chancery; there is a brief description of the chronology and geography of documents contained in Lithuanian Metrica Books of Inscriptions No. 18, 32, 33 and 36, mentioning their type, authorship and
content of the more important documents, and a comprehensive discussion of sources of particular interest to historians of Russian history. Entering into polemics with colleagues from abroad and taking into account their own and others’ experiences, the article’s authors present their opinion on the archaeographical requirements for contemporary historical source publications in the academic sciences in Russia; they discuss issues relating to the publication of duplicates of the Lithuanian Metrica complex being released by other archaeography centres. There is a comprehensive description of the principles for the structure, content, how the text should be presented and formation of the academic-informative elements that were applied in the publication of the first volume of “Queen Bona’s Metrica” in Moscow in 2018, and which should be realised in new releases of the books and acts of the Lithuanian Metrica being prepared for printing by the Institute of Russian History.
On the basis of act sources this article examines the peculiarities of administration of Sts. Boris and Gleb Orthodox Kolozha Monastery by the laity shortly before the formation of the Church Union of Brest, the list of superiors of this religious house is ascertained. In the mid-16th century struggle for the monastery clergy investiture was waged between Queen Bona Sforza and her son Sigismund II Augustus. Each of them deemed herself/himself to be the holder of the right to enthrone archimandrites and appoint laic guardians of the monastery. Two charters from the books of the Lithuanian Metrica throwing light on the history of administration of Sts. Boris and Gleb Monastery during that period are published in annex to this article.
The boundary Usvyaty Volost for a long time was the subject matter of disputes in diplomatic negotiations between Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Muscovite state. From the late 1520s to the mid 1550s the Usvyaty and Ozerishcha Volosts belonged to queen Bona Sforza. The Lithuanian Metrica contains copies of some ustavnaya gramotas issued by the queen to the local population. After the conquest of Polotsk and Ozerishcha in 1563–1564, the Moscow part insisted on the Usvyaty Volost belonging to the Polotsk Povet. As one of the arguments in favor of its territorial ambitions, the ambassadors referred to certain gramotas of Bona brought out to Moscow. The references to them are contained in the list of the Tsar Archives of the 1570s. The contents of the queen’s ustavniy lists which never were demonstrated to the Lithuanian ambassadors contradicted the Moscow diplomats’ testimonies. This article concentrates on the review of the references to queen Bona’s gramotas in the Russian-Lithuania diplomatic correspondence of the XVI century, identification of their copies existing in the Lithuanian Metrica, and an attempt to reconstruct the contents of the ‘Box 227’ in the Tsar Archives where the originals of these documents formerly could be kept.
This article is concerned with analyzing the documents of the Usvyaty Volost history in the first half of the XVI century which are contained in Queen Bona’s Metrica and other sources. In this work the problem of dating some of Queen Bona’s charters is considered, the questions of administrative and territorial belonging, governance, and taxation of this frontier region on the eve of the Livonian War are studied.
Серию продолжает второй выпуск «Актов, относящихся к истории Западной России», содержащий публикацию копийных документов 18-й и 32-й книг записей Литовской метрики — сборников, которые входят в состав так называемой метрики королевы Боны. Публикуемые документы охватывают период с начала XV до середины XVI в. и принадлежат авторству великих князей литовских и королей польских Витовта, Казимира, Александра, Сигизмунда I Старого, Сигизмунда II Августа, королевы Боны Сфорца, православных литовско-русских князей Кобринских, Ярославичей, Пронских, представителей известных дворянских родов Великого княжества Литовского. В составе сборников содержатся уставные грамоты территориям, документы на право владения землей, адресованные представителям служилого сословия, православного и католического духовенства, судебные, распорядительные и делопроизводственные документы.
Для историков, источниковедов, археографов.