|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 by Charles R Greathouse IV at Thu Sep 08 08:45:11 EDT 2022
|
|
| PROG
|
(MAGMAMagma) [(n^2+7*n+8)*2^(n-3): n in [0..40]]; // Vincenzo Librandi, Aug 03 2014
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion
|
| Thu Sep 08
| 08:45
| OEIS Server: https://oeis.org/edit/global/2944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 by Susanna Cuyler at Mon Jun 15 22:58:10 EDT 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 by Michael De Vlieger at Mon Jun 15 22:30:21 EDT 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 by Michael De Vlieger at Mon Jun 15 22:30:19 EDT 2020
|
|
| LINKS
|
Igor Makhlin, <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.02916">Gröbner fans of Hibi ideals, generalized Hibi ideals and flag varieties</a>, arXiv:2003.02916 [math.CO], 2020.
|
|
| STATUS
|
approved
editing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 by Harvey P. Dale at Mon Aug 05 18:03:02 EDT 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 by Harvey P. Dale at Mon Aug 05 18:02:58 EDT 2019
|
|
| MATHEMATICA
|
LinearRecurrence[{6, -12, 8}, {1, 4, 13}, 30] (* Harvey P. Dale, Aug 05 2019 *)
|
|
| STATUS
|
approved
editing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 by Bruno Berselli at Tue Jul 17 12:29:11 EDT 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 by Bruno Berselli at Tue Jul 17 06:13:30 EDT 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion
|
| Tue Jul 17
| 06:20
| Omar E. Pol: Dear Bruno: I think the triangle should be a new sequence (Axxxxxx) instead of an example in this entry. Then you can write a comment about Axxxxxx here.
|
|
| 06:35
| Bruno Berselli: It did not seem to me that this triangle was interesting as sequence, so I preferred to use it to further justify A084851.
|
|
| 06:48
| Omar E. Pol: The problem is that the triangle is a new sequence. I think that is not a good idea to write a new sequence in the example section of a entry from another author.
|
|
| 06:50
| Omar E. Pol: Here I prefer only a comment as "Row sums of Axxxxxx", where Axxxxxx is the proposed triangle.
|
|
| 07:58
| Bruno Berselli: Waiting for a new sequence, if it is necessary, I think we can keep this triangle as example. Alternatively, dear Omar, can you add that triangle as sequence? Thanks.
|
|
| 11:41
| Omar E. Pol: Dear Bruno: Sorry, I have not time for the new sequences. I am worried about other new examples of the same type added by other contributors in the future. We assume that a contributor puts a new sequence in the example section of an entry created by another author. Then the new sequence, used as an example, in the same entry should be reviewed by an OEIS Editor. This would be very confusing! This type of structure, where a new sequence is inserted into the example section of another entry, resembles a Russian doll or "Mamuschka". I think that is not a good idea.
I think it's best to put everything in its place. Best regards.
|
|
| 12:29
| Bruno Berselli: Ok, I have not time for the new sequence that you ask. I think this triangle is relevant also as example. Thanks a lot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 by Bruno Berselli at Tue Jul 17 06:13:21 EDT 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 by Bruno Berselli at Tue Jul 17 06:12:43 EDT 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
