In T368610#10040294, @Wong128hk wrote:

@jrbs may I know if the vote can start extend at anytime or need to wait until the end of UCoC poll, technically ?
If possible, please start extend from 5 Aug 00:00 UTC and end at 11 Aug 23:59 UTC. Thanks.

@jrbs may I know if the vote can start extend at anytime or need to wait until the end of UCoC poll? Thanks.

In T368610#10039379, @kiryuukoko wrote:

The community reached a rough consensus that Stewards should be the scrutineers.

In T368610#10039344, @jrbs wrote:

In T368610#10037447, @Zheng_Zhou wrote:

B'crat @Wong128hk also stated that WMF’s security team is already investigating activities that may have obstructed procedural fairness of this RFDA.

I think you mean the Trust and Safety team, as far as I know the Security team is not looking at this.

The community reached a rough consensus that Stewards should be the scrutineers.

In T368610#10037447, @Zheng_Zhou wrote:

B'crat @Wong128hk also stated that WMF’s security team is already investigating activities that may have obstructed procedural fairness of this RFDA.

Thanks!

OK, done.

Need community consensus.

In T368610#10037542, @SCP-2000 wrote:

@Ericliu1912 @Zheng_Zhou Please discuss this matter on zhwiki instead of here. This isn't the place to discuss policy. Thanks.

Please discuss this on zhwiki instead of here. This isn't the place to discuss procedures. Thanks.

Though with no clear mention in policy and without precedent in RFDAs, I do think it is within their authority to extend the poll, in order to determine community consensus in a critical situation, just as RFAs, in which they had exercised the power to prolong the poll multiple times before.

In T368610#10037450, @Ericliu1912 wrote:

Under current rules, local bureaucrats has the final say on whether the poll should be extended. It is always possible to deal with other problems (including the legitamacy of the extended poll itself) after the whole procedure had concluded, so there's no reason not to go forward with it.

Under current rules, local bureaucrats has the final say on whether the poll should be extended. It is always possible to deal with other problems (including the legitamacy of the extended poll itself) after the whole procedure had concluded, so there's no reason not to go forward with it.

The zh.wiki community never reached a consensus w.r.t. extending the poll. Local policy did not stipulate the procedures related to extension, either. Local policy did require Stewards as scrutineers, and we would like to request Stewards involvement as the B'crats are trying to extend the poll without disclosing result of the current poll. B'crat @Wong128hk also stated that WMF’s security team is already investigating activities that may have obstructed procedural fairness of this RFDA. Under the circumstances, shouldn’t the zh.wiki community hold and wait for result of security team’s investigation? I don’t see how extending the poll for 1 week can correct any potential issues with procedural fairness.

In T368610#10037244, @jrbs wrote:

In T368610#10036050, @Wong128hk wrote:

@jrbs Per consensus of B'crats, the poll need to be extended for a week in order to get a clear community consensus. Please note. Thank you.

Do you mean 1 week from today (i.e. closing on August 8 or 9)?

In T368610#10036050, @Wong128hk wrote:

@jrbs Per consensus of B'crats, the poll need to be extended for a week in order to get a clear community consensus. Please note. Thank you.

In T368610#10036120, @kiryuukoko wrote:

Due to local policy, we need Stewards as scrutineers.

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:管理員的離任#解任程序

Due to local policy, we need Stewards as scrutineers.

@jrbs Per consensus of B'crats, the poll need to be extended for a week in order to get a clear community consensus. Please note. Thank you.

Change #528205 abandoned by Urbanecm:

[mediawiki/extensions/CentralAuth@master] Create "vanish" option in Special:GlobalRenameRequest

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/528205

In T368610#10016978, @SCP-2000 wrote:

@jrbs Hello, the vote is ended. Could you please grant the right to Scrutineers for checking votes? Thanks.

@jrbs Hello, the vote is ended. Could you please grant the right to Scrutineers for checking votes? Thanks.

In T368610#9979773, @SCP-2000 wrote:

@jrbs Hello, could you please add WiTo7946@zhwiki into the voter list? His username was changed recently. Thanks.

@jrbs Hello, could you please add WiTo7946@zhwiki into the voter list? His username was changed recently. Thanks.

In T368610#9975726, @0xDeadbeef wrote:

After some internal discussion, this was a misunderstanding on @3301796's part. The configuration was correct and there is no need to change the options.

After some internal discussion, this was a misunderstanding on @3301796's part. The configuration was correct and there is no need to change the options.

Oh, no. All oversighters in zhwiki are all inactive lately...

Ok, thanks.

In T368610#9975680, @3301796 wrote:

The content of the poll has not written yet! (It should be您是否同意解任 Mys_721tx 的管理員？, 支持, 中立, 反对)

The content of the poll has not written yet! (It should be您是否同意解任 Mys_721tx 的管理員？, 支持, 中立, 反对)

In T368610#9975673, @3301796 wrote:

There is an error on the poll. Can someone edit it?

There is an error on the poll. Can someone edit it?

In T368610#9972203, @SCP-2000 wrote:

@jrbs Hello, could you please change the end date to 26 July 2024 00:00. The voting period is 14 days. Thanks.

@jrbs Hello, could you please change the end date to 26 July 2024 00:00. The voting period is 14 days. Thanks.

Change #1050030 merged by jenkins-bot:

[mediawiki/extensions/SecurePoll@master] Add files for the BoT vote 2024

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1050030

Should be done. Election admins (Jimmy Xu, AT, Wong128hk) may check everything looks OK.

I aim to set this up today.

We hope this could be set up as soon as possible in case of any time conflict with the upcoming U4C 2024 special election (started at Jul 27). Thanks.

The Movement Charter Ratification vote is ended. Should this poll be started?