Note that this is a larger copy of the picture printed in the magazine.
A search for renewals was done in publications for the years 1968 and 1969. There were no listings for this magazine's title; The only listing with "Hollywood" in the title was for Hollywood Patterns, published by a different company, Conde-Nast. There's no evidence of continuing copyright for the magazine.
Note that it may still be copyrighted in jurisdictions that do not apply the rule of the shorter term for US works (depending on the date of the author's death), such as Canada (70 years p.m.a.), Mainland China (50 years p.m.a., not Hong Kong or Macao), Germany (70 years p.m.a.), Mexico (100 years p.m.a.), Switzerland (70 years p.m.a.), and other countries with individual treaties.
Additional source information:
This is a publicity photo taken to promote a film actor. As stated by film production expert Eve Light Honthaner in The Complete Film Production Handbook, (Focal Press, 2001 p. 211.):
"Publicity photos have traditionally not been copyrighted. Since they are disseminated to the public, they are generally considered public domain, and therefore clearance by the studio that produced them is not necessary."
Nancy Wolff, includes a similar explanation:
"There is a vast body of photographs, including but not limited to publicity stills, that have no notice as to who may have created them." (The Professional Photographer's Legal Handbook By Nancy E. Wolff, Allworth Communications, 2007, p. 55.)
Film industry author Gerald Mast, in Film Study and the Copyright Law (1989) p. 87, writes:
"According to the old copyright act, such production stills were not automatically copyrighted as part of the film and required separate copyrights as photographic stills. The new copyright act similarly excludes the production still from automatic copyright but gives the film's copyright owner a five-year period in which to copyright the stills. Most studios have never bothered to copyright these stills because they were happy to see them pass into the public domain, to be used by as many people in as many publications as possible."
Kristin Thompson, committee chairperson of the Society for Cinema and Media Studies writes in the conclusion of a 1993 conference with cinema scholars and editors, that they "expressed the opinion that it is not necessary for authors to request permission to reproduce frame enlargements. . . [and] some trade presses that publish educational and scholarly film books also take the position that permission is not necessary for reproducing frame enlargements and publicity photographs."[1]
Првобитан дневник отпремања
Оригиналан опис странице је био овде. Сва наведена корисничка имена воде на en.wikipedia.
{{Information |Description=Photo of actress Vivien Leigh as Scarlet O'Hara. |Source=[http://archive.org/stream/hollywood30fawc#page/n549/mode/2up page 41] middle photo. Hollywood (magazine) |Date=[http://archive.org/stream/hollywood30fawc#page/n513/mod...
Ова датотека садржи додатне податке, који вероватно долазе од дигиталног фотоапарата или скенера коришћеног за дигитализацију.
Ако је првобитно стање датотеке промењено, могуће је да неки детаљи не описују измењену датотеку у потпуности.
Наслов
Vivien Leigh
Извор
Bettmann
Заслуге/пружалац услуга
Bettmann Archive
Приказана особа
Vivien Leigh
Аутор
Contributor, Bettmann
Назив слике
(Original Caption) Head and shoulders portrait of British actress Vivien Leigh, wearing ruffles and ribbons as Scarlett O'Hara in the film 'Gone with the Wind', 1939.
Кратак наслов
SF26439
Носилац ауторских права
This content is subject to copyright.
Датум и време сликања
08:00, 1. јануар 1939.
Оријентација
Нормално
Водоравна резолуција
72 тпи
Вертикална резолуција
72 тпи
Категорија
E
Посебна упутства
Not Released (NR) This image is intended for Editorial use (e.g. news articles). Any commercial use (e.g. ad campaigns) requires additional clearance. Contact your local office to see if we can clear this image for you.