Marcelo Starcenbaum
Doctor en Historia (Universidad Nacional de La Plata)
Docente-investigador en la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación (UNLP)
Investigador Asistente de CONICET
Docente-investigador en la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación (UNLP)
Investigador Asistente de CONICET
less
InterestsView All (34)
Uploads
El presente volumen reúne los trabajos presentados en Coloquio Internacional: 50 años de Lire le Capital, celebrado en Buenos Aires, en octubre de 2015. El encuentro fue organizado por la Red Latinoamericana de Estudios Althusserianos (ReLEA), L'Associazione Louis Althusser (Italia) y las revistas Demarcaciones y Décalages.
El presente volumen reúne los trabajos presentados en Coloquio Internacional: 50 años de Lire le Capital, celebrado en Buenos Aires, en octubre de 2015. El encuentro fue organizado por la Red Latinoamericana de Estudios Althusserianos (ReLEA), L'Associazione Louis Althusser (Italia) y las revistas Demarcaciones y Décalages.
This paper analyzes the reception of Louis Althusser by communist intellectuals between the late 1960s and the mid-1970s. In this regard, we note that Althusserian Marxism was grasped as both a singular exercise in rereading Marx and a type of theoretical work that sustained the Maoist criticism of official communism. Likewise, we show that, although there was a frontal rejection of antihumanist notions, some Althusserian theses were incorporated into the theoretical discourse of the party in the struggle against other currents of contemporary thought.
The work of Armando Bartra builds a dialogue with other Latin Ameri-can Marxists who think and write on practices of rejection or application of Marxist categories to the reality of the subcontinent. The Mexican intellectual approaches, in a productive and unprejudiced way, the relationship between Marxist doctrine and the particularities of Latin America. In this article we propose to analyze the specific features that this link acquires in his work. We will carry out this analysis by tracing the concepts of Pea-santry, State, Nation and Modernity in his work.
The objective of this work is to analyze the specific ways of articulating history and politics in the work of Zavaleta Mercado and to approach the differentiated modes in which the experience of the National Revolution is understood in this work. Through a reading of his most significant works, we find that the problem of the national-popular is an element of permanence throughout his work. We will see that, beyond the different stages of his work, the experience of the National Revolution is the subject of an analytical perspective in which the interpretation of politics is associated with a strong notion of historicity.