Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Skip to main content
alan ralphs

alan ralphs

This article provides some insight into the constraints on the potential of recognition of prior learning (RPL) to widen access to educational qualifications. Its focus is on a conceptual framework that emerged from a South African Study... more
This article provides some insight into the constraints on the potential of recognition of prior learning (RPL) to widen access to educational qualifications. Its focus is on a conceptual framework that emerged from a South African Study of RPL practices across four different learning contexts. Working from a social realist perspective, it argues that RPL needs to be seen as a specialised pedagogy that enables navigation across different cultures of knowledge; this is inevitably a contested process because it questions dominant forms of knowlegde and modes of knowledge production.
Research Interests:
The story of prior learning assessment, more commonly referred to in South Africa as the recognition of prior learning (RPL) forms part of the complex history of educational systems transformation reviewed in this chapter. Significant... more
The story of prior learning assessment, more commonly referred to in South Africa as the recognition of prior learning (RPL) forms part of the complex history of educational systems transformation reviewed in this chapter. Significant milestones in the development of RPL policy and practice in South Africa are covered with reference to socio-economic realities and challenges, the attempt to build a National Qualifications Framework, links with leading international organisations; and some of the first pilot projects attempted in higher education and workforce development after 1994.
This article argues that greater understanding of the Aristotelian concept of phronesis or practical wisdom would make an important contribution to the conceptualization and implementation of Recognition (Assessment) of Prior Learning... more
This article argues that greater understanding of the Aristotelian concept of phronesis or practical wisdom would make an important contribution to the conceptualization and implementation of Recognition (Assessment) of Prior Learning (RPL/APL) in formal education contexts. However, there is a need to identify phronesis empirically so that RPL assessors can identify it and RPL candidates can articulate it. Extracts from the qualitative data of two separate research projects are presented to show examples of phronesis. These extracts also show the difficulties associated with its articulation and identification. It is argued that even if phronesis cannot be accredited for RPL purposes, it should be taught and discussed in the curricula of adult education and RPL portfolio development courses to show the importance of this form of knowledge and reasoning and the different forms it might assume in formal education and life contexts.
Internationally, Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) has become a standard component of education policy reforms aimed at meeting the requirements of the global market economy on the one hand, while responding to demands for widening... more
Internationally, Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) has become a standard component of education policy reforms aimed at meeting the requirements of the global market economy on the one hand, while responding to demands for widening access to further and higher education on the other. RPL’s goal of building greater equity of access to education is of particular significance in the South African context, given its historical background of racial exclusion. However, despite the promises of RPL to enable ‘optimal inclusion’ this ideal is not easily realised in practice.
Drawing on case studies of RPL practices in four different contexts in South Africa, the book offers a novel theoretical framework for understanding RPL not simply as an assessment practice, but as a specialised pedagogy for navigating different knowledge, learning and assessment boundaries in different contexts. It also defines the generic and distinctive features of the ‘inner workings’ of RPL practices, and illustrates how these inner workings play themselves out via the four case studies. It develops a common conceptual conceptual language for describing RPL practices across different sites and contexts, thus providing a unique theoretical contribution to a field that has traditionally been under-theorised. It concludes by discussing the implications of its findings for policy, funding, implementation and further research.
Research Interests: