Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
A blog about television by TIME’s TV critic James Poniewozik.

TV Tonight: 30 Love? Or 30 Like?

As Jamie Weinman at MacLean's has noted, there seems to be a little bit of a critical backlash out there against 30 Rock, which returns tonight on NBC. Having seen the first two episodes of the season, I both get the pushback and don't get it. On the one hand, they show off the show's brilliance at topical commentary and throwaway jokes, but they also show some of the limitations that hold it back from being a top-tier comedy. (Where I would place, for instance, The Office today.)

On the other hand it's pretty much the same show you've been watching for a couple seasons now, so I don't see what's changed, except perhaps critics' desire to correct for the series' effusive Emmy love.

Pretty early on in its run, 30 Rock decided that it was going to be a show mainly about the jokes and not character development. It has two central characters, Jack and Liz, who get to have psychology and motivation and ongoing personal struggles. The other characters are sharply defined, but as attitudes more than three-dimensional people: Jenna's insecure, Tracy's crazy, Kenneth's naive. (And these characters will sometimes change when it serves the needs of the script—as tonight, when Kenneth suddenly develops a backbone because the show needs him to lead a strike by the NBC pages.)

There's nothing inherently wrong with this, but it's limiting. It means that any given 30 Rock is going to be full of really funny moments and one-liners. But it means that episodes will only occasionally be greater than the sum of their jokes: either when they make do a sustained satire on one idea ("Cooter"), or, more rarely, when they really delve into Liz or Jack ("Apollo, Apollo"). Compare 30 Rock to another live-action show with a high joke-per-page ratio, Arrested Development: after a similar number of episodes, you simply don't know Tracy or Pete the way you did Buster or Tobias.

That means that an average, non-stellar 30 Rock is almost more like a sketch comedy than a sitcom, memorable more for its parts than for its overall narrative. (I remember, say, that the Oprah episode had the hilarious cutaway to Liz as Princess Leia and the great mix-up of Oprah and the tween girl Liz sat next to on the plane--but I'd have to really think to remember what the episode was about.)

Again, absolutely nothing wrong with that, and 30 Rock is almost unbeatable as commentary on the news (in tonight's episode, a running storyline about the difference between New York and "real America"; Jack notes that NBC owner General Electric is trying to appeal to Middle America by naming its new mammogram machine the "Get 'Er Done 2000"). It's also indispensible as a satire of TV, especially NBC: tonight's 30 Rock ends with a searingly bite-the-hand crack about Jay Leno. (Tina Fey and Jon Stewart are the two best TV critics working on TV.)  But to repeat a common refrain of mine, the comedy with the most jokes is not automatically the best comedy: an episode of The Office (or, yes, Parks and Recreation) is for my money more memorable even when it's less funny.

I'm starting to sound backlash-y myself here, so I'll wrap up. The fact is, I laughed a lot at the two episodes of 30 Rock I saw, and I'm betting you will too. The rest depends on whether the jokes to add up to something more for you, or if you even want them to.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (5)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    I think when a show dominates the Emmys like 30 Rock does, backlash just comes naturally.

    I was really happy the first time Jeremy Piven won his Emmy. Then he won it the next two years. This year, I was happy to see him not get nominated.

    It happens with movies as well. I had a conversation a couple of weeks ago about the movie No Country For Old Men. The two people I was talking too loved the movie, where it seemed that I didn't.

    But when No Country came out, I thought it did deserve to be considered for Best Picture. But once it won all the other awards prior to the Oscars, it seemed redundant and I wanted something different. So I began to look at it as an overrated movie (even though I really like it).

    So...if 30 Rock never won an Emmy for Best Comedy people would be pulling for it, kind of like they do for Hugh Laurie. If Laurie won three or four times there would be a backlash against him.

  • 2

    Comparing a show to Arrested Development is never fair to the other show. Just sayin'.

  • 3

    Heads up: Parks and Recreation is ridiculously racist this week! Shockingly so.

    Apparently the writers have no idea that Hugo Chavez was *elected* president, and is not a military dictator. Instead we have three Venezuelan government officials who seem racist and sexist, rude and ignorant, dress in military uniform and claim they lock up anyone who opposes them, which is staggeringly critical of a country that does no such thing. We even have these military guys bragging about their large estates, when Chavez is responsible for redistributing wealth, including giving Venezuelans the highest minimum wage in all of Latin America.

    And "Wow", the Committee to Humiliate and Shame America? Hugo Chavez, the guy selling cheap oil to poor Americans? Disgraceful stuff.

    • 3.1

      To back peddle a little, I may mean xenophobic or ignorant or even bigoted, it's hard to tell what term to apply to the show.

    • 3.2

      Hi Tom, i do not agree with what you have written here, you are very clear thah Chavez was elected president, its true but it was 10 YEARS AGO, he had change a lot of laws to his own benefite and to make his power bigger, thats whay a dictator do or not? Maybe he has not yet say IM A DICTATOR but he acts like one. Chavez is not responsible for redistributing wealth that is not true you have to be here to see how every day you are scare for your life because the insecurity is awfull or watch how doctors works without any instruments and see their pacients dying on the floor because theres no beds available. Yeah its true that Venezuela has the highest minimum wage in all of Latin America that its like 400$ but what can do a Venezuelan with 400$? NOTHING...a Burger of Mcdonals costs 35$, dayly shop in a market 200$ for a family of 4....a good pants 130$...a dinner on a restaurant for one person 100$, Nike tennis shoes 300$...
      an sthethoscope that costs 140$ in the US here costs 1000$ ( I talk about these because i study medicine and its one of my dayly instruments)...so you tell me, is that fair? Of course you have to pay water, electricity, and all that stuff...is fair??? NO NO NO!

      Venezuela is a country that have the power of the oil...we live of oil...but...a person that loves his people, that loves his country can gifts first the unique form of making money to other countrys and let his own country in misery? Thats the truth...im very proud to be Venezuelan but the people who manage my country ( because they are not the owners of Venezuela) are a shame!

      I will like you to see all these, maybe i talked only about politics and not of the show but you have to now whats going on here in Venezuela!

      PD: Ive watched the episode and the part that The military guy gave the 35000$ to Amy and then have to say VIVA CHAVEZ that is true...is one form of the goverment to buy the soul and dignity of the people...just for disgusting politic! Thank You and good bye!

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Tuned In Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's Tuned In in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
RICHARD HEENE, father of Colorado's "balloon boy", on the family's homemade flying hot-air balloon that the nation mistakenly thought was carrying the 6-year-old boy for hours Thursday; the boy was instead found at home hiding in the garage

Stay Connected with TIME.com