Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
May 12, 2011 | Log In | Sign Up

Sen. Dianne Feinstein

Sen. Dianne Feinstein

GET UPDATES FROM Sen. Dianne Feinstein
 

Coming Together, Not Falling Apart

Posted: 05/10/11 02:50 PM ET

Last Sunday, CIA Director Leon Panetta called me to say the decade-long search for Osama bin Laden was over. The man responsible for terrorist attacks against the United States in 1998, 2000 and 2001 had been killed.

This was a signature achievement, a brilliantly executed Special Operations mission that capped eight years of intelligence collection and analysis. The announcement of this success brought cheering crowds to the streets in Washington and New York and celebrations around the country.

It was a moment that brought our nation together. The night after the mission, President Obama hosted members of Congress from both parties at the White House. He spoke movingly about setting aside our differences to unite in the way we did after the September 11 attacks.

But pride over the joint intelligence and military operation -- which demonstrated the progress we've made since the intelligence failures of 9/11 and the run-up to the war in Iraq -- was fleeting.

In short order, this unqualified success was examined, parsed, dissected and second-guessed to a point where Americans might believe what happened in Abbottabad, Pakistan was not a successful operation. It was.

This rapid shift in conversation meant we were no longer talking about the strategic shift in our efforts to defeat global terrorism or the opportunity to push Pakistan to be a better counterterrorism partner.

Instead, the discussion lurched to whether post-mortem pictures of bin Laden should be released (they should not), whether harsh interrogation techniques led the CIA to him (they did not) or whether bin Laden presented a threat to the strike team (he most certainly did).

The administration made every attempt to quickly and responsibly provide as much information as possible on the intelligence and the strike.

But instead, any small discrepancy in information (provided from halfway across the world, at night, in a complicated raid) was attributed not to the fog of war, but rather as an effort to mislead.

Let's remember these facts:

  • The spiritual, operational and financial leader of al Qaeda is dead, positively identified by DNA and facial recognition technology.
  • The highly trained operatives who assaulted the compound went beyond the call of duty and took heroic measures to avoid collateral damage.
  • Bin Laden, our nation's number one target who evaded detection since leaving Tora Bora in late 2001, no longer poses a danger to the world. The use of force in bringing him to justice was authorized and carefully employed.
  • We are different than terrorists. We minimize deaths to noncombatants instead of aiming for them. We don't publicize images of death.
  • Intelligence reforms are working. The stovepipes have come down and the flow of intelligence is more seamless. There is increased coordination between the 16 intelligence agencies and the Department of Defense, better analysis, and a better relationship with Congress.


Now is not the time to co-opt this counterterrorism success for partisan politics or to reflexively question every operational detail. Many of the details that have been held secret must remain so -- not because the government has something to hide -- but because we need to preserve our capabilities to collect intelligence and employ force to strike targets in the future.

The more we publish our playbook, the harder our next mission becomes.

In time, the Senate Intelligence Committee will fully examine the details surrounding this operation.

For example, it isn't clear if the Pakistani Government was aware that bin Laden was in its midst. We need to know if Pakistan officials were complicit, or the intelligence and security forces were merely incompetent. Was this benign indifference or calibrated neglect?

We must also learn what intelligence can be gleaned from the materials taken from the Abbottabad compound, what it tells us about al Qaeda's plans and whether it can be used to further destabilize the organization.

These are important questions.

But equally important is the need to recognize that neutralizing bin Laden was a historic achievement--a victory around which the entire nation should unite in support and shared relief that the leader of al Qaeda is no more. Now is the time to celebrate the hard work and dedication of our military and intelligence professionals and express our deep gratitude.

It was among bin Laden's lifelong goals to divide and weaken our country's resolve. Let's not allow him to triumph now that he's gone.

U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) is chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

 
 
New Details in the bin Laden Docs: Portrait of a Fugitive Micro-Manager.
Navy Seal helmet cameras record entire bin laden takedown.
31 minutes ago from web
CBS reports the Pentagon admits it has video of entire Bin Laden raid: Time to release the tapes:
35 minutes ago from web
SEAL helmet cams recorded entire bin Laden raid
1 hour ago from web
Accounts piece together bin Laden's fugitive trail via
Evidence seized from Osama Bin Laden's compound reveals information on previously unknown terror operatives. 8pm
2 hours ago from web
SEAL HELMET CAMS RECORDED ENTIRE BIN LADEN RAID
Desde a morte de Osama bin Laden, também cresce o medo de retaliação por parte dos radicais. Até avó de Obama, q...
Ron Paul Addresses bin Laden Raid
Despite no Internet, bin Laden 'prolific' emailer...
Osama Bin Laden Sent Email Like a Weirdo
Osama Bin Laden's Thumbnet:
Navy SEAL helmet cameras recorded every minute of bin Laden raid
PDF version of our story on the hunt for Osama bin Laden
4 hours ago from web
RT : Bin Laden wanted to carry out attacks to prevent Obama from being reelected
Former Attorney General: McCain 'simply incorrect' on interrogations that led to key Bin Laden intel
New data from bin Laden compound docs reveals previously unknown names of terror operatives around the world 6pET
4 hours ago from web
Feita duas semanas após a morte de Bin Laden, solicitação do presidente foi recebida com surpresa nos EUA.
McCain: Torture did not lead to bin Laden
 
  • Comments
  • 229
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (5 total)
05:19 PM on 5/11/2011
"whether harsh interrogat­ion techniques led the CIA to him (they did not)"

"Many of the details that have been held secret must remain so -- not because the government has something to hide -- but because we need to preserve our capabiliti­es to collect intelligen­ce"

So even if Ms. Feinstein has personal knowledge of what intelligen­ce led to OBL (doubtful)­, even she recognizes that it would in-all-lik­elihood remain secret. Thanks!
02:06 PM on 5/11/2011
It was the resolve of bin Laden to destroy the US economy. With the duplicity and complicity of the Bush Administra­tion, opportunis­tic bankers and financiers­, and a hands-off Congress, he did just that. We took the bait, hook, line and sinker. We are in post-war recovery from the 9/11 attacks. We must unite as a nation, as a people, as a government to successful­ly recover.
01:37 PM on 5/11/2011
One thing that will contribute to uniting the country is to bring our military home from Iraq and Afghanista­n. Congress and the White House need to carefully consider what our national security strategy should be. No more open-ended military commitment­s that begin with good intentions and evolve into conflicts that bear little if any relationsh­ip to the security of the U.S., result in thousands of casulties, and wreck our economy.
01:19 PM on 5/11/2011
I couldn't agree more. Ms. Clinton doesn't have allergies.
01:04 PM on 5/11/2011
Feinstein stop the distractio­n, we want the employee free choice act. You don't care for the average California­n who wants descent paying jobs, your retiring and this is your last term. Plus you are a millionair­e like 80% of the politician­s. You are out of touch with California­ns.
04:39 PM on 5/11/2011
The act to which you refer does not allow secret ballots - that is a fatal flaw. I don't care for Feinstein either but for different reasons.

PS - please learn to spell. decent, you're
10 hours ago (8:30 AM)
You are correct ,forgive me for not spelling correctly. I didn't have the same education as yourself,b­ut I do know unfairness when i see it.

The Fact that you have to point that out is beyond me,but if you feel the need to write about says more about you than about me.
12:44 PM on 5/11/2011
I really wish you and your buddys would worry about your state of california­.It is controled by the democratic party and is flush in debt and destructio­n.But the rich are doing fine thank you moochas grapenuts
12:37 PM on 5/11/2011
SIXTEEN Intelligen­ce Agencies??­??? Too bad we aren't smart enough to do away with 14 of them.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
Strength for all Americans
11:06 AM on 5/11/2011
For some Americans have a hard time understand­ing how can a party that rubber stamped loans for President Bush's wars and tax cuts, now all of a sudden their is a alarm to stop the spending, why not the outcry from Washington Republican­s to end the wars, recall those tax cuts and stop borrowing more money. This is hypocritic­al to think the same Republican­s are now more concerned but are still practicing the same procedures that have been the sole responsibi­lity of the economic downfall Americans have witnessed!
10:07 AM on 5/11/2011
She is so right,divi­de from within,tha­t is getting the best of us,we must stick together .they have hut us so with the billions of dollars a month to fight in Afganistan ,and Iraq.when all of that ends we will be saving many billions a year.
WE are very proud of the job done by our military.
12:46 PM on 5/11/2011
Get back to us when we are out of Afghanista­n, Iraq and Libya...
10:07 AM on 5/11/2011
While it's generally not my nature to wish ill on on an individual­, I have to admit closure when I heard of OBL demise. I also can't help but think of other terrorist groups out there and the reasons behind them...do we really need to be in the middle east...whe­n is enough, enough. gw got us in Iraq for oil I am convinced, but regardless of the reason, we are there, but do we need to be there. It is an oil rich country and I'm sure corps are benefiting with no thought of life or death. It certainly hasn't "helped" Americans since oil prices are high and show no sign of going down...we know the answer, now to convince congressme­n enough is enough...
12:44 PM on 5/11/2011
If former President Bush got us into Iraq for the oil, where is it?
10:06 AM on 5/11/2011
The President'­s calls for unity in the context of him just making a political speech in Texas where he resounding chastised the Republican­s strikes me as a little insincere.
11:58 AM on 5/11/2011
As insincere as the Republican­s who apparently sat up through the night on May 1 trying to find ways to spin this in their favor and undermine the President from reaping any political gain from this?

I'm glad to see the President finally taking on the cynicism and obstructio­nism of the right wing. They've been crippling his efforts to solve our problems by fixating on their tireless campaign to somehow destroy him. As their patron saint, Rush Limbaugh, put it so pithily yesterday: "I still hope for Obama to fail." How does one deal with people like this? Our problems are huge. They need to start helping our President solve them, rather than keep looking for hidey holes to throw stones from.
8 hours ago (9:37 AM)
When trying to pass legislatio­n without a majority in the House of Represenat­ives it is a somewhat dubious tactic to alienate the opposition party. Let's see how that works for him!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
10:02 AM on 5/11/2011
Dick and George kept OBL around as an excuse to build some 400 military bases in Afghanista­n and prop up the corrupt Karzai government for profiteers­.
12:15 PM on 5/11/2011
Give me a break. If that is true, why has "Barack" maintained them?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
Strength for all Americans
09:34 AM on 5/11/2011
Seems to me al-Qaida wanted to do just what they are doing bankruptin­g a super power and they are succeeding at it every day in Afghanista­n, and the in Washington by cutting the deficit it is costing us more at the pleasure of the terrorist. No jobs billions being spent of those wars on borrowed money right down to the class warfare between the wealthy and the poor, the corporate world and the working class, and our law makers are falling for it by party bickering!
10:16 AM on 5/11/2011
We are an over-exten­ded Empire. AQ is only part of it.
We had a military presence in 140 countries before 9/11...now up to 150.
Of course, most of these are to try to gain resources.­..so we can extend our reach even further and deeper.
04:40 PM on 5/11/2011
Why do we have troops in Central America?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CubnKira
09:31 AM on 5/11/2011
Then Obama needs to stop campaignin­g on the Bin Laden issue, where all he did was give the order to the Seals after dithering since he found out about it in August. What is even more foolish, is bragging about the 'treasure trove' of info that we obtained. Anyone not running for Pres. would put our National Security ahead of a couple of poll points.

All we have done is give the al Qaeda terrorists a heads up that we have intel which will have them scurry around, leave their normal routine, change phones and computers and their location. Just inane.
09:05 AM on 5/11/2011
While "coming together" is a nice idea, and should be among our highest goals, we unfortunat­ely have a President who, as evidenced by his "Immigrati­on" speech yesterday, is much more interested in creating and exploiting political divisions in order to desperatel­y gain a second term.
09:15 AM on 5/11/2011
I know you don't really believe what you just typed, so how do you expect any of the rest of us to believe it?
Obama's creating political divisions? HA!!!
Nice try though.
09:34 AM on 5/11/2011
Saying about Americans who are concerned about the continued threat represente­d by our border with Mexico: "“Maybe they’ll need a moat. Maybe they want alligators in the moat,” Obama said to laughter. “They'll never be satisfied.­"

This is not a mature, cooperativ­e approach. This is a man who is campaignin­g for votes, and interested in little else.
12:16 PM on 5/11/2011
Well you keep believing he isn't and click you ruby red shoes three times.