Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

Weekly Ketchup: Familiar Names Return for X-Men: Days of Future Past

Plus, new roles for Cate Blanchett, Charlize Theron, George Clooney, and biopics for Marvin Gaye and Marilyn Monroe.

This week's Ketchup includes movie development news stories for such films as Disney's live action Cinderella, a remake of Flight of the Navigator, a Marvin Gaye biopic, Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy, and the sixth movie based upon Marvel's X-Men comic book characters. There's also new roles for George Clooney, Charlize Theron, and Reese Witherspoon.


This Week's Top Story

SEVEN FAMILIAR NAMES RETURN FOR THE VARIOUS TIMELINES OF X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST

As fans of old school Marvel stories know, X-Men: Days of Future Past (the 2014 film) is based upon one of the earliest examples of time travel leading to complicated alternate realities, which in the 30+ years since, has inspired many similar arcs in other properties. As such, that classic story was sort of perfect for 20th Century Fox when the studio was looking for a way to connect the timelines of the prequel X-Men: First Class and the cast of their first three X-Men movies. And this week, that film's director, Bryan Singer, sort of went crazy on Twitter, letting the world know about all the people who will be returning for X-Men: Days of Future Past in some capacity. That list includes two Magnetos (Sir Ian McKellen and Michael Fassbender), two Xaviers (Patrick Stewart and James McAvoy), a Mystique (Jennifer Lawrence), and a Beast (Nicholas Hault). Barely 24 hours passed, and we learned of the seventh actor, which is Hugh Jackman as Wolverine, who, as we all know, changed his mind at some point about what he told Magneto and Professor Xavier to do to themselves in X-Men: First Class. 20th Century Fox has scheduled X-Men: Days of Future Past for July 18, 2014.

Fresh Developments This Week

#1 CATE BLANCHETT CAST AS DISNEY'S NEXT EVIL STEPMOTHER

Walt Disney Pictures is well into a new series of live action fantasy adventures based upon classic books and folk stories, which started with Alice in Wonderland in 2010, and will continue in 2013 and 2014 with Oz: The Great and Powerful and the Sleeping Beauty adaptation Maleficent, respectively. If one expects an annual rate going forward, the next movie might be planned for 2015, and it appears that the movie in question might just be a (currently untitled) adaptation of Cinderella. The reason for expecting that the Cinderella movie is approaching production is that Cate Blanchett is now in talks to take on the role of Cinderella's "evil stepmother" in that film. If Blanchett signs on, the evil stepmother will join the ranks of her other fantastic characters, such as Galadriel in the Tolkien adaptations, and the main villain in Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. Unless he directs another movie earlier, this Cinderella adaptation is likely to be the fourth feature film for director Mark Romanek, who made his studio debut in 2002 with One Hour Photo, which led to eight years of development hell on various projects before his second film, Never Let Me Go, was released in 2010. The most recent draft of the Cinderella adaptation was written by Chris Weitz, whose work as a screenwriter includes The Golden Compass, and cowriting credits on About a Boy.


#2 CHARLIZE THERON MAY ELICIT SYMPATHY FOR LADY VENGEANCE

Filming is currently underway on Spike Lee's English language remake of the South Korean thriller Oldboy, which features Josh Brolin, Elizabeth Olsen, Sharlto Copley, and Samuel L. Jackson. Now, there's casting news for another remake of one of the movies (directed by Park Chan-wook) from the same trilogy as Oldboy, although the two films are otherwise unrelated. Charlize Theron will produce and star in an adaptation of Sympathy for Lady Vengeance (released in the US as simply Lady Vengeance), about a woman "who, for reasons of her own, completes a prison term for a murder she did not commit, reemerging to punish the killer, and avenge the dead." Warner Bros is also developing an English language remake of Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance, which was the first film of Park Chan-wook's Vengeance Trilogy, but might actually be the last of the three remakes to be adapted. The screenplay adapting Sympathy for Lady Vengeance is being written by screenwriter William Monahan, who previously adapted an Asian thriller when he worked on The Departed for Martin Scorsese, and Monahan also recently cowrote the sequel Sin City: A Dame to Kill For.


#3 GEORGE CLOONEY TO HEADLINE NEW YORK CRIME SYNDICATE DRAMA

It was just last week that the news broke that director Paul Greengrass was back in development on the "final days of MLK" drama Memphis. That, however, didn't necessarily mean that Memphis would be Greengrass' next film as director, and so here we are nine days later with another project for the director of United 93, The Bourne Ultimatum, and next year's Somali pirate thriller Captain Phillips. George Clooney is signed to produce and star in an untitled crime drama that has something to do with "New York crime syndicates" which, when one starts to really think about it, is borderline annoyingly vague. The screenplay is an original story, and it was written by Argo screenwriter Chris Terrio. Clooney also recently signed on to star in director Brad Bird's equally mysterious science fiction project 1952.


#4 THE "BELOVED" PROPERTY THE SAFETY NOT GUARANTEED DIRECTOR WAS TALKING ABOUT WAS... FLIGHT OF THE NAVIGATOR

Recently, director Colin Trevorrow (Safety Not Guaranteed) attracted a lot of attention from a quote he made about tackling a property that would get him a lot of heat online. The problem was that people misinterpreted that to mean he was up for the job of directing Star Wars Episode VII. This week, we found out what movie (or, rather, what remake) he was actually talking about, and in comparison to Star Wars, this movie really doesn't come anywhere close. Colin Trevorrow and his Safety Not Guaranteed screenwriter Derek Connolly have signed with Walt Disney Pictures to work on a remake of their 1986 science fiction film Flight of the Navigator, about a boy who finds himself transported to the future after discovering an alien spacecraft. The time travel element is particularly of note considering what Safety Not Guaranteed is ostensibly about (ie, possibly/probably time travel). Trevorrow and Connolly have also sold another spec script to Disney, but nothing is known about that one right now. Likewise, there is a third film that Derek Connolly has sold to Pixar which will be the feature film debut of director Teddy Newton, who previously directed the Pixar short film Day for Night. As for why the Flight of the Navigator remake is a Fresh Development, it's sort of the same reason why Trevorrow was being overly cautious in his veiled comments. Simply put, Flight of the Navigator is not as rabidly protected by the fan community at large as Trevorrow seemed to think, and so the idea of it being remade? Sure, why not? The result might actually be better the second time around.


#5 WHAT'S GOING ON WITH LENNY KRAVITZ AND THE MARVIN GAYE BIOPIC?

Rocker (and son of Roxie Roker from The Jeffersons) Lenny Kravitz has had a few small movie roles, most notably in Precious and The Hunger Games. However, so far, Kravitz has yet to have an entire movie to carry as the lead character. That may change if director Julien Temple (Earth Girls are Easy, The Great Rock'n'Roll Swindle) is able to get the pieces together to make his Marvin Gaye biopic, Midnight Love, actually happen as a finished and produced film. Such a caveat is usually required when it comes to musical biopics, which have a particularly low rate of production versus the number of movies that get announced via the film business' press. For confirmation of that fact, one needs go no further than director Cameron Crowe, who himself has been trying to get a completely separate Marvin Gaye biopic going, with Terrence Howard among those up for the lead role.


#6 THIS WEEK IN GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY NEWS: STAR-LORD CASTING CONTENDERS, AND THE CASE OF THE TWO YEAR OLD BLOG

Let's get the bigger of the two news items concerning Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy out of the way, by pointing out something that should have been caught months ago. Let's look at the timeline: Way back in February of 2011, director James Gunn posted a blog entitled "The 50 Superheroes You Most Want to Have Sex With: 2nd Annual Poll Results", which included some homophobic remarks (look at the #5 entry about Gambit, for an example). And then, in September of 2012, Gunn was confirmed as the director of Guardians of the Galaxy, and it wasn't until this week that the blog entry, nearing its 2nd anniversary, became controversial. At question here might not be whether Gunn's remarks were offensive, but whether Marvel should have done their research well enough to know that this would eventually be revealed, and possibly cause problems for their production of what is already an obscure and challenged adaptation to begin with. And with that, let's turn now to the other quasi-news for Guardians of the Galaxy this week, which is that several actors have (or will soon have) tested for the lead role as Peter Quill, AKA "Star-Lord." That list includes (in alphabetical order) Joel Edgerton (Uncle Owen from the prequels), Garrett Hedlund (TRON: Legacy), Jack Huston (Richard Harrow from Boardwalk Empire), James Marsden (Cyclops from the first three X-Men movies), Lee Pace (TV's Pushing Daisies), Eddie Redmayne (Marius from the upcoming Les Miserables), Sullivan Stapleton (Animal Kingdom), and Jim Sturgess (Across the Universe). The Marvel casting people may have recently watched both Animal Kingdom and The Other Boleyn Girl, as both of those movies feature two of the above actors (Edgerton/Stapleton, and Redmayne/Sturgess, respectively). At least 7 of those 8 actors will definitely be landing the role, which sort of illustrates the empty, non-story-ness of these sort of "casting call" stories.


#7 THE 2013 SUNDANCE FILM FESTIVAL UNVEILS A HANDFUL OF YOUR FUTURE FAVORITES (AND ABOUT 100 MOVIES YOU'LL NEVER ACTUALLY SEE...)

(...and the tricky part is there's no way of knowing which movies are which.) Yes, yes, indeed, January of another year is just around the corner, and so it's that time again for the Sundance Film Festival to announce the list of 100+ independently produced films which will be screened beneath the icy peaks of Park City, Utah. There's really not enough space in this column to get anywhere close to a thorough summary of all the films that will be screened. So, instead, this writer just wants to address one specific category, which is the "Park City at Midnight" selection. Historically, it's the Midnight films that are the most "mainstream" and/or "box office friendly" films, so if one makes a guess as to which Sundance films will actually get distribution and be seen by a larger audience, this writer thinks the Midnight films are where you should look first. Some of the movies that have premiered in that category in the past have included Black Dynamite, The Blair Witch Project, Paranormal Activity, and Saw, two of which obviously led to long running horror franchises. This year's Park City at Midnight selection includes the horror spoof Hell Baby from writer/directors Robert Ben Garant and Thomas Lennon, the horror sequel S-VHS, and the video game action comedy Virtually Heroes, about two characters in a first person shooter who become aware that they're in a game (basically a live action Wreck-It Ralph with R-rated jokes). Collider.com has several entries with photos and full listings in every announced category for your perusal, so head on over there.

Rotten Idea of the Week

#2 MGM REMAKING HORROR MOVIE EVEN HORROR FANS WOULD BE CHALLENGED TO REMEMBER: THE TOWN THAT DREADED SUNDOWN

Here's a fun experiment that I'm pretty sure absolutely no one will actually take me up on. Take ten horror movie fans, and ask them to list their 100 favorite movies of the genre. My guess is that absolutely no one will pick the 1976 slasher flick The Town That Dreaded Sundown, the third movie from director Charles B. Pierce (The Legend of Boggy Creek). John Carpenter's Halloween is often credited for inspiring the wave of slasher films that came soon after, but The Town That Dreaded Sundown was pretty clearly inspired by The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (and also, it came out two years before Halloween). Like Tobe Hooper's 1974 film, The Town That Dreaded Sundown involved a place with the same first four letters (Texarkana, Arkansas), and vaguely alluded to being based on a true story (neither film actually was). Anyway, the story here is that MGM has plans for a remake of The Town That Dreaded Sundown. The "Rotten" part of this story doesn't have so much to do with whether that particular movie gets remade, but rather with the fact that MGM these days seems dedicated to being the Studio of the Remake (see also: RoboCop, Poltergeist, etc.). We're just a week past the release of the Red Dawn remake, which might be more unnecessary than... just about anything, but still, the world can't be crying for a remake of The Town That Dreaded Sundown when it doesn't even know the movie existed to begin with.


#1 REESE WITHERSPOON AND NAOMI WATTS CAST AS (MUCH YOUNGER) REAL LIFE WOMEN

Reese Witherspoon and Naomi Watts both came up in completely unrelated movie news stories this week that actually have something very specific in common. In both cases, the creative types stressed the ages of the real life subjects, and in both cases, Reese Witherspoon (36) and Naomi Watts (44) are clearly about 15 years too old for their roles. First, let's discuss Reese Witherspoon, who has landed the lead role in an adaptation of Cheryl Strayed's memoir, Wild: From Lost to Found on the Pacific Crest Trail. The memoir will be adapated by Oscar-nominated screenwriter Nick Hornby (An Education), who as an author also wrote the movie-inspiring novels High Fidelity, Fever Pitch, and About a Boy. The true story is about a woman whose mother has recently died, and with her marriage in shambles, who decides to hike the 1,100 miles of the Pacific Crest Trail by herself. The sticking point, however, is that when all of this happened, Cheryl Strayed was only 22, which Reese Witherspoon hasn't been since around the time she filmed 1999's Election. Similarly, there's director Andrew Dominik, who's out there talking about Killing Them Softly, who was also asked by Collider.com about his plans for a Marilyn Monroe biopic called Blonde. Within two sentences of saying that the actress would have to be in her late 20s because Monroe died at 36, Dominik said that the actress he's hoping to cast will be Naomi Watts. To use the same math, the last time Naomi Watts was in her late 20s, she was still a couple of years from being cast by David Lynch in the 2001 film Mulholland Drive. Obviously, actors and actresses frequently play characters of different ages, both younger and older, but especially in the case of the Marilyn Monroe project, the irony is that the person making the decision seems not even to know the age of the actress he's making such a fine point of being important. So, this week, silly decisions about age land both of these movies as the week's Most Rotten Ideas. Now, just watch... in 2014, Reese Witherspoon and Naomi Watts will probably be up against each other for Best Actress Oscars.

For more Weekly Ketchup columns by Greg Dean Schmitz, check out the WK archive, and you can contact GDS via Facebook.

Comments

Shane Burridge

Shane Burridge

Actually, 'Static' was Mark Romanek's first feature (which I actually saw in a cinema), not 'One Hour Photo'. You might wanna change that.

Nov 30 - 05:16 PM

greg_dean_schmitz

Greg Dean Schmitz

I'll ask RT to insert the word "studio" before debut on Monday. Thanks for knowing about that. :)

Nov 30 - 08:49 PM

Poya Eivazmohammadi

Poya Eivazmohammadi

Age doesn't matter when you don't look your age. I think they will do fine.

Nov 30 - 05:24 PM

Brenton M.

Brenton Malnofski

X-Men: Days of Future Past is going to be great! This week confirmed that. X-Men and X2 were great, so having Singer on board is perfect to connect First Class, also great, back to the originals. And the returning actors locked it down. Counting down the days...of future past, lol. 7/18/2014, COME FASTER!

Nov 30 - 06:08 PM

Zachary Wisz

Zachary Wisz

X-Men comes out the same day as The Hobbit Part 3, so it should be interesting to see which movie does better. I'm not really rooting for any of them because
A) A 3rd Hobbit film feels like a cash grab and I would gladly have accepted just two movies, but PJ had to go ruin everything and now we have to wait another 6 months to watch the rest of it.
B) First Class wasn't the best movie in the world, and I don't really mind a sequel but if I don't say something that evens out with my view on There and Back Again it'll make me look like I glorify the Hobbit too much. :P
But in reality, I'll most likely see both films anyway.

Nov 30 - 07:20 PM

Premo Beat

John Noto

How dare PJ include more source material in an effort to give Tolkien fans a most satisfying Hobbit experience.

Dec 1 - 10:57 AM

Zachary Wisz

Zachary Wisz

no one wants to watch flashbacks that have nothing to do with the hobbit for 3 hours.

Dec 2 - 08:22 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

What a sad, sheltered little boy. Out here in the real world, it's actually one of the most anticipated films of the year. By "someone", I presume.

Dec 3 - 11:28 AM

Zachary Wisz

Zachary Wisz

@Janson
In the real world, people want to watch serials in chronological order. So because "Part 3"--which will probably be cancelled anyway because it's such a stupid idea--is supposedly full of flashbacks about the dwarves and other stuff that has nothing to do with Tolkien's first novel >>>THE HOBBIT<<< , it should have been filmed and released first. But it hasn't. So it shouldn't be part of the Hobbit Trilogy.

Two movies was just fine, and I'm hyped about them, but the third movie is just a way to make it feel like LOTR nostalgia by making the series a trilogy. (Man, what is it with trilogies these days?) Oh and also to make more money. So that "someone" is being fooled and robbed of his good, hard-earned money to see a movie in a series that is ALREADY IN POST PRODUCTION and therefore has ENDED.

So where does part three fit in? Nowhere. No one cares about how Gandalf first met Bilbo or what Smaug's childhood was like... And I'm certainly not interested in watching Gollum go crazy in a cave over the course of 500 years.

If you're going to make three films out of the Hobbit, just make them all two hours and not three so you can have more room for context that appears in the BOOK and less room for stuff that doesn't even exist (like Tauriel). WE DON'T NEED TO SEE EVERY SINGLE GOBLIN WHOSE NAME APPEARS IN THE HOBBIT! Show, don't tell, you say? Well in this case, just have Gandalf explain how Thror died! We don't need to see it!

God, PJ is just milking the crap out of this book. He's adding stuff from the appendices you say? PFT! Appendices my ass! They're nothing but a bunch of timelines and language notes. Who cares about that? And don't just say "blehhh the more Middle-earth the better :P".

Well I say, how are a bunch of flashbacks or whatever going to fit in the 3-act film structure? Beginning, middle, and end? There's nothing in the appendices or flashbacks or the 60-year gap between Hobbit and FOTR that can sustain a runtime of more that 45 minutes.

There is no anticipation from this milked cow from me anymore. Two films, yeah way to go, I'll see them, but if it ends abruptly without completing the whole Hobbit book's story, and if I have to wait another 6 months to see the rest of it, I'm just gonna snap.

Dec 3 - 05:50 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

Atta boy! Look at you reading and stuff.

"is supposedly full of flashbacks about the dwarves and other stuff that has nothing to do with Tolkien's first novel"

Supposed by who?

"So that "someone" is being fooled and robbed of his good, hard-earned money to see a movie in a series that is ALREADY IN POST PRODUCTION and therefore has ENDED."

All of the films were shot together, and the three-film format was planned back even when Del Toro was slated to direct.
"just make them all two hours and not three"

The Hobbit looks to be about 2 hours 40 minutes. I doubt this trilogy will be anywhere near the total running time of LOTR.

"He's adding stuff from the appendices you say?"

Did I?

"Two films, yeah way to go, I'll see them, but if it ends abruptly without completing the whole Hobbit book's story, and if I have to wait another 6 months to see the rest of it, I'm just gonna snap."

But you sound like you got it so together already.

Dec 3 - 07:13 PM

Zachary Wisz

Zachary Wisz

"Supposed" by everyone, including PJ himself.

Actually, no, the Hobbit was planned as two films since 2006. Do your research, fool.

I know how long the movie is. I'm saying that if it were to be three movies based solely on the book, then two hours would have sufficed.

When I mean "you" when talking about the appendices I was using it to identify the majority of idiots who think flashbacks and a bunch of useless shit from the appendices was a good idea.

Yeah, in fact I really am pretty mad about the series being a trilogy. What a cash grab Jackson is pursuing. I hope he never makes the Silmarillion. LOTR were good, Unexpected Journey will probably be good, Desolation will also be good, but I think they should have kept it as "There and Back Again" and finished the story in that movie. Three is just crap...

Dec 3 - 07:52 PM

King  S.

King Simba

X-men would be wise to move its release date. Even if it ends up being the better film X-men has never been nearly as big as Lord of the Rings. Hobbit could end up crushing it.

Also, early reactions for the hobbit have been pretty postive, so it looks like the decision to turn Hobbit into 3 films didn't end up having as much effect on the quality as we thought.

Dec 1 - 10:58 AM

Brad and Netflix

Bradly Martin

Oh no I think as films the Hobbit will be rated and should be rated very high because Peter Jackson is a fantastic film maker, as far as watching the story The Hobbit unfold I think the concern is what we will really be getting. Because a 200 page book being a 9 hour film epic seems so Odd you know?

Dec 1 - 10:47 PM

Christopher Kulik

Christopher Kulik

I'm actually holding in my hand a VHS copy of THE TOWN THAT DREADED SUNDOWN, encased in one of those giant old ugly Warner Home Video clamshells (1983, not the 2001 re-release on VHS). It's a relic that's for sure--good little film, don't get me wrong, some good suspense, nice '40s Texas atmosphere. But it's also kinda routine.

Now, as far as the remake of the FLIGHT OF THE NAVIGATOR is concerned: as a huge fan of the original, I'm all for it. Why? Oh, man, the original has DATED BADLY. Definitely nostalgic value, with some nifty special effects, but it can't exactly transcend its decade, thus I'm all in for a remake.

Nov 30 - 07:49 PM

Captain Terror

Captain Terror

Nice, I don't have the TTDS VHS but I do have the original one-sheet hanging in my dining room. (Yes, dining room)

Recently heard Shout Factory is releasing a BluRay in '13!

Dec 2 - 04:43 AM

Christopher Kulik

Christopher Kulik

Hey, if you want the VHS tape you could have it! Still plays great! Unless you really want the Blu-Ray of course.

Shout! Factory needs to get on Fox's ass to release the BATMAN show, that's what I've been waiting for forever. Even with Warner Bros. officially now given merchandising rights, still no sign. Are they gunning for a 50th anniversary release you think?

Dec 2 - 04:38 PM

Frisby2007

George Roman

Top news & the Cinderella adaption are the only interesting news this week. But Disney, when do you plan in enlightening us with the Mulan adaption?

As for that "The Town that dreaded sundown", never heard of it, don't care about it, & doesn't look interesting, so blah.

Nov 30 - 09:49 PM

King  S.

King Simba

I'd rather Disney focus on their animated fantasy films. Even the computer animated ones, Brave and Tangled, were way better than any live action fantasy based on fairy tales or classic books that we've gotten recently.

Dec 1 - 12:19 AM

Frisby2007

George Roman

Unless their animated films are hand-drawn, then I'll gladly focus on them. If not, then I'll look forward more to their live-action ones.

Dec 1 - 07:58 PM

King  S.

King Simba

Computet animated fantasy films by Disney: Tangled, Brave.

Live action fantasies by Disney: Alice in Wonderland, The Sorcerer's Apprentice

To each his own, but I think Disney has had a much better track record with their animated fantasies (whether hand drawn or CGI) than their live action ones.

Dec 2 - 08:37 AM

Frisby2007

George Roman

Ahem, Brave is PIXAR.

And I hope you're not implying that Alice in Wonderland was bad (it's not Burton's best, but unlike the wonderful 2D one, his had a PLOT).

Dec 2 - 04:02 PM

Lance Reeder

Lance Reeder

Alice in Wonderland 2D had a plot, the same one the classic book had. Difference is the plot for the 2D was classic, the plot for the 3D one was crap, Depp's Hatter excluded...and PIXAR is Disney.

Dec 2 - 06:13 PM

Valmordas

Val Mordas

Disney owns everything. I came home yesterday and found out Disney owns my house. They plan to install mouse ears on it next week.

Dec 3 - 05:16 PM

George V.

George Voulcan

Flight of the Navigator made a pretty big impression on a lot of kids. I just saw it again after god know how many years and it's actually not that bad a movie at all. I can't believe it didn't do better at the box office. Probably it's structure was the problem. The kid really doesn't get into the ship until more than halfway through the movie. I hope the remake is good.

Nov 30 - 10:48 PM

George V.

George Voulcan

I hope the director keeps the florida setting. Anything by the ocean would be great.

Nov 30 - 10:49 PM

King  S.

King Simba

Can't wait for X-men: Days of Future Past. I loved first class and the storyline for DOFP sounds epic, while it's great to see Bryan Singer returning to the X-men franchise. As for Hugh Jackman joining the cast, I'm not sure it's that big of a deal. After all, it could very well be just another cameo appearance (though if it's as great as then one in First Class then I'm not complaining).

Cinderella? Doesn't seem like the kind of fairytale studios would be fond of doing. I mean, it's not like the story offers a whole lot of special effects sequences that Alice or Oz got. Don't really care anyway. The only live action fantasy film I'm looking forward to (other than The Hobbit trilogy of course) is Oz: The Great and Powerful and that's because of Saimi Raimi (though I'll admit the second trailer really made me cringe. "I can't die, I haven't accomplished anything yet"? Another fantasy centered around a prophecy? The only thing that keeps me optimistic is that Raimi has a knack for giving charm to even the most cheesiest things). The animation lineup is looking way more interesting with Frozen, Del Toro's Pinocchio and Selick's The Graveyard Book.

It's seems like when it comes to remaking foreign films, Hollywood takes them really seriously. Getting William Monohan to write the script for Sympathy for Lady Vengeance was a great idea and even though Charlize Theron has a knack for picking a lot of stinkers when the occasion calls for it she can really deliver.

I grew up with Flight of the Navigator, but I'll be the first to admit it hasn't aged well at all. A remake could easily improve upon the original (or it could become even cheesier, as was apprantly the case with Red Dawn).

Not familiar with most of the names in line for the Guardians of the Galaxy film. Then again, so far Marvel studios has been great with picking the right actor for the right role in their films, with not a single actor feeling miscast. Anyway, I'm looking forward to Guardians of the Galaxy more than I ever expected to. Although I've liked all of Marvel Studio's films it's nice to see them branching out with something that's more out there.

Your last line in that Reese Witherspoon and Naomi Watts news is probably what's going to happen. Oscars love biopics and both of those films look like perfect oscar baits.

Nov 30 - 11:32 PM

Brad and Netflix

Bradly Martin

I've always thought Naomi Watts casting has been crazy wild like this. In the Impossible she is portraying a Spanish Woman, and In The Ring the original character was a mid 40's asian Man. This casting isn't that wiered for her it's just business. Films demand diversity be made Pretty little and White.

Dec 1 - 09:01 AM

Ronnie Harvey

Ronnie Harvey

It actually makes me happy that a movie like "The Town That Dreaded Sundown" is being remade. I would rather they remake films that I have never heard about then movies that I love. Films that were not able to find there way the first time around should be remade.

Dec 1 - 09:31 AM

Ronnie Harvey

Ronnie Harvey

It actually makes me happy that a movie like "The Town That Dreaded Sundown" is being remade. I would rather they remake films that I have never heard about then movies that I love. Films that were not able to find there way the first time around should be remade.

Dec 1 - 09:31 AM

Stephen Florentine

Stephen Florentine

"The Town That Dreaded Sundown" most certainly was based on a true story and unlike "Chainsaw" followed the events pretty closley. There were definitely deviations and some unnecessary comics scenes but a lot of the scenes in the film were portrayed exactly as they happened.

Dec 1 - 09:48 AM

greg_dean_schmitz

Greg Dean Schmitz

Thanks for that correction - thought the story was fictional because otherwise... why wouldn't MGM just say the movie was based upon the true story? True stories are frequently retold, but usually not called "remakes." Hence the confusion.

Dec 1 - 01:56 PM

Jason Sills

Jason Sills

They should make a movie where that robot ship from Flight of the Navigator and Johnny 5 from Short Circuit battle to the death for E.T.'s love.

Dec 1 - 02:05 PM

Augustine Chin

Augustine Chin

the most exciting news this week is the remakes of the South Korean trilogy - especially oldboy. those films are amazing and charlize theron is actually the perfect actress to cast in Sympathy for Lady Vengeance

Dec 1 - 04:21 PM

John Gagnon

John Gagnon

So tired of all the crap X-Men movies.

Dec 1 - 07:39 PM

Valmordas

Val Mordas

A symphony of yawns. X-men has potential of course, and yet with a few exceptions I find the potential of this series has been squandered so far. None of the films were bad, but I can't remember much about them either.

Dec 2 - 05:37 AM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

I'll give any Mark Romanek project a chance, even a silly "Cinderella" film. I'l far less concerned about the "Vengence" trilogy remakes, and much more eager to see Park Chan-wook's new horror film "Stoker". And I'll also give Andrew Dominik's "Blonde" a chance, but I don't think Watts bears much of a Monroe resemblence.

I don't care for either one of the Marvin gaye projects. Kravitz has built a career off of humping the Rock Gods of old (Hendrix, Lennon, T. Rex and whoever else he's bitten), but he sure ain't no Marvin. However he might be better than Terrence Howard. I'm still amazed how awful he was in "Red Tails", plus he doesn't look too much like Gaye.

I prefer remakes of bad old movies over attempts to remake the classics. Give these young filmmakers something to work with. Somebody think they can make a decent film out of "The Sentinel"?

"Flight of the Navigator" was no "D.A.R.Y.L.".

Dec 2 - 10:26 AM

What's Hot On RT

RT on DVD & Blu-Ray
RT on DVD & Blu-Ray

The Dark Knight Rises Arrives

Man of Steel
Man of Steel

New poster: Superman in chains

Poster reveal
Poster reveal

Star Trek Into Darkness goes bleak

Iron Man 3
Iron Man 3

A stark look at all-new pics

Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Mobile