Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

All-TIME 100 Novels

Critics Lev Grossman and Richard Lacayo pick the 100 best English-language novels published since 1923—the beginning of TIME.

53 comments
BelindaRenaBachtiar
BelindaRenaBachtiar

More on my wishlist. But it's kinda sad when I don't see The Alchemist or 1Q84 or The Tales of Two Cities up there. And no Harry Potter series? Is it not grand enough to make it on the list?

julio_tos
julio_tos

What about The naked and the dead by Norman Mailer?

DavidCrownover
DavidCrownover

I agree with most of the list. Kudos for Catch-22, and Lord of the Rings. I would also include The Hobbit . I understand you can't overload with JRR Tolkien . Thanks for your efforts. You might have considered When Worlds Collide by Balmer and Wylie and After Worlds Collide having to do with a planet-sized asteroid hitting the earth . Very timely. Excuse the pun ! Letters from The Earth by Mark Twain I guess missed the year date cut off...

Alexa
Alexa

Shouldn't this list be more properly described as 100 all time best "English" novels? It excluded way too many important non-English works to be taken seriously as "all time best novels".

MichaelWBergen
MichaelWBergen

Thank you for the great list. Thank you for not including Hawthorne and Melville or Twain. We are finally past the founding fathers.  taught many of the books considered classics now. it so good to see the mystery writes and the sci-fi writers finally included among the best. I majored in philosophy in the 60s and Ayn Rand was being damned even them for selfishness as a virtue philosophy. But she has been dead right about tis pervasiveness today, hasn't she?

aztecprincess
aztecprincess

I think if some of these titles had been properly translated into Spanish when I was younger, or had they been available in México a while ago, I would've read more of them... However, The Catcher in the Rye, To Kill a Mockingbird, Beloved, The Great Gatsby, are indeed among my favorites! ;)

FogodoEon
FogodoEon

W-h-e-r-e-'-s  K-E-R-O-U-A-C ? in Canada?

Jshnayer
Jshnayer

Eh, I understand why Atlas Shrugged didn't make the cut, but I think it's rather unfair not to include The Fountainhead. All this talk and apologizing about not including Ulysses, but not even a mention of The Fountainhead. Admittedly, Atlas Shrugged does suffer from things like the 60 page interjection of pure didactic philosophy, but the Fountainhead is a beautifully written and intricate novel--and most people, fans of Rand or not, will admit that. Most likely the authors of the list eschewed Fountainhead because they've been conditioned to recoil violently to the mention of Rand's name and start mouthing the usual talking points (wasn't there a rape scene? Isn't it hypocritical of her to accept that Social Security and Medicare that she was legally forced to pay for, not to mention walk on sidewalks? Didn't she commit the unforgivable sin of having an affair, which no author of any repute would dare dream of doing?). But they did encourage people to challenge them, and I think the many comments about Rand in this message thread give credence to the value of her novels. They don't make it into the "best of" lists, but still sell by the millions every year and remain enduring classics--I think that's something special.

salamipizza
salamipizza

@Jshnayer The Fountainhead was even better than Twilight but not as good as Captain Underpants

tegar
tegar

heavy reading not my suit

ScottMullin
ScottMullin

Doesn't it seem like someone who is a fan of "At Swim-Two-Birds" would write the title correctly (instead of "At-Swim Two Birds")?

AlexW
AlexW like.author.displayName 1 Like

I find it truly representative of the current mindset, lacking of theology and geometry, to make a list that chronologically discriminates against the classical work of Boethius. Apparently De consolatione philosophiae lacks some particular perversion which today's literary critics are seeking!

OH FORTUNA!  --- Seriously though, I wish John Kennedy Toole made the cut. : (

creepykittyeyes
creepykittyeyes

I have to say, this list feels a little flawed. Perhaps if you did a list of books that actually encompassed all of time, and books that were actually written in other languages too. Guess what, guys? The English language isn't the end-all, be-all.


notLostInSpace
notLostInSpace

I am not a conservative, but would argue that "Atlas Shrugged" is a lot more important literature than Portnoy's Complaint!  Where is "All the President's Men"?  "Dune".  Any Stephen King on there?  I'd suggest "the Shining".  I have not read nearly enough of these, but got to think "Lolita" is not all that important either.  I'd put "The Devil in the White City" over several of these.  Also "Tailor, Tinker, Soldier, Spy".  How about an entry for Ian Fleming?

DavidCrownover
DavidCrownover

Good point ! Absolutely ! Ian fleming influenced a whole generation of movies and writers!

hansikapunszy
hansikapunszy

I miss Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand and also just anything by Paul Auster.

Glad to see To Kill a Mockingbird, one of my favourite books, on the list.

zip
zip

Ayn Rand may be a philosopher of some noteriety, but her ability to write is not worthy of note when considering the best 100. Perhaps if considering the finest 50000, a reader with no love for the beauty of words could toss her overated scratchings into the yard with other less than literary works to dress up the browned spots created by the drove of non-readers milling about in hopes of finding something to make them feel good about their linmited exposure to an education.   

like.author.displayName 1 Like

@zip You spelled limited wrong.

LaPaz
LaPaz like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

The thing about Top 10, 100, or 1837 lists are they are never going to please everyone, the authors of this list know that. However, instead of complaining about your favorite books not being on the list, why not read the books that ARE on this list? You will find some new favorites, I PROMISE you!

DanErre
DanErre

I cant' find in this list the wonderful 'Stoner', by John Williams...

skdave
skdave

Agatha Christie is missing! And then there were none, the murder of roger ackroyd, etc etc.

puja011
puja011

I don't want to comment more but how do you forget Great Expectations? Not that good of a list...

r.Copke
r.Copke

@puja011 Read the intro: "The parameters: English language novels published anywhere in the world since 1923, the year that TIME Magazine began"

puja011
puja011

Also The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, maybe The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, and White Fang

puja011
puja011

You forgot Fahrenheit 451, Brave New World, and Uncle Tom's Cabin

ShoottheCritic
ShoottheCritic like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

How about a Coetzee novel? I know you have a couple of Faulkner already on there, but this list cannot exclude "Absalom, Absalom!" Also: Hemingway's "A Farewell to Arms," one of the most beautiful U.S. novels. 

- Shoot the Critic

lifeofherown
lifeofherown

Women are half the population, but apparently only less than 20% of their work is featured on your list. Seriously, when featuring 100 books, you couldn't have found more than 18 top books by women? Give me a break. 

austtie
austtie like.author.displayName 1 Like

Your novels of choice are some of the truly best indeed. Some I have not yet read but plan to because of YOUR words which are :) inspiring! Thank you ever so much!

Nettie Thomas

jccarl56
jccarl56

Missing : The Day of the Jackel (Forsythe). How can Bukowski be omitted from any list ? Did you know Ayn Rand collected her social security checks. I thought that might interest those who find Ms. Rand a pillar of conservative values and non government interference in any aspect of our lives. She is a world class hypocrite. Anathem is Neal Stephenson's best book, although the one listed is very good. Any list that doesn't have " The Stranger " at or near the top, is what Bukowski would say is, " A river of shit on it's way to oblivion. "       

Jshnayer
Jshnayer

You might be interested to know that Rand advocated (quite openly) that people---when given a chance to recoup things that were forcibly taken from them---should do gladly do so. If a robber stole $10 from you but decided that they were going to give you $3 back, would it be rational or sensible for you to refuse your own money? Also, if accepting the Social Security and Medicare (that she was legally obligated to pay for ((and considering that she moved to this country before SS and Medicare were created, she paid into the systems for the entire duration of their existence))) means she was hypocritical, then was she also not hypocritical for walking on the sidewalk or driving on roads? Was she hypocritical for drinking water provided by legal monopolies (the water companies)?  Would you suggest that she stand still until she died, since that is the only thing which a person can do to avoid government interference in one's life. As she would say, you should check your premises.

hambone_nm
hambone_nm like.author.displayName 1 Like

Figures no Ayn Rand, not surprised considering our liberal media!

Brigitte
Brigitte like.author.displayName 1 Like

Next time one of these lists is put together, could the parameters be changed to have a woman editor included in the decision process? Are there no female employees at Time? Or do only men (and all are named Richard) work there? How about a little diversity? Bringing in a female editor would make this list more balanced, if nothing else it would lend credibility to some of the selections. As, I highly doubt, the men behind this list when they were deciding which of their all-time favorite novels should be included, they thought nostalgically about “Are You There God, It's Me Margaret”,(…rolls eyes..).Reading this wonderful book, is a common rite of passage for every pre-teen American girl and it has earned a spot and I wouldn’t have thought twice about it if there wasn't such a lack of female representation - both in the list of authors and the subject matter of the books selected..What about Edith Wharton, one of the great American novelists of the 20th century and the first woman to win the Pulitzer Prize? You couldn't find one, out of the dozens of Wharton's novels published in the 1920's to add to this list? What about Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale? Yes - you included the Blind Assassin but there were plenty of male authors on here who are listed twice and Atwood's work should have been too

reliesonwits
reliesonwits like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

@Brigitte First of all, Are you there god, its me margaret? was on the list....and Second, 50% of the greatest novels of all time have not been written by women. I'm sorry. That isn't a shot at women, had they been giving equal attention throughout years of sexist publishing, no doubt would there be more women on this list. But, I find it completely false to make a simple cry of sexism just because there are less women than men. Come on, give us a break. Let the books speak for themselves, honestly I wish more women got more attention but it is a fact that women get published less than men. That is sexist, not the reviewers here.

lifeofherown
lifeofherown

@Brigitte Exactly! Women are half the population, but not even 20 female authors are included! amen!!

syednabeel
syednabeel like.author.displayName 1 Like

This list is a joke. This list has certainly be prepared by a less read person. It doesn't have Ayn Rand and Kane and Abel.

mmbangson
mmbangson like.author.displayName 1 Like

@syednabeel Oh boy.  Out of any author not represented on the list, Ayn Rand is the one whose absence incenses you the most??  I gotta say, I'm snickering a little over here.  Perhaps it is YOU who ought to expand your reading horizons.  Not to demean Ayn Rand, but she's not God, though her disciples often confuse the two...  Objectivism is at best benignly self-serving and at worst morally repugnant.

syednabeel
syednabeel like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

@mmbangson @syednabeel It doesn't incense me in any way. It isn't so dear to me, this topic. It amuses me. Of course Ayn Rand is not God, I wouldn't dare say that, on the contrary she was an atheist (a blasphemist to be critical), but her writings are in no way less than beautiful. She was one of those authors who pioneered the fields of fiction and non-fiction alike and also came up with an interesting (not saying right) concept of objectivism. Her quotes such as: - "Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage’s whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men."and "A government is the most dangerous threat to man’s rights: it holds a legal monopoly on the use of physical force against legally disarmed victims." - inspire deep thought and tap-dance around the concepts of politics and society. Furthermore, quotes such as - "The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." 

and 

"“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see.” - are poetic yet so controversially political. My friend, I assure you, Ayn Rand is not for everyone. I totally understand if you don't like her work. Just like she would have said it - But then quality is not for all men, but only those who seek it.

reliesonwits
reliesonwits like.author.displayName 1 Like

@syednabeel @mmbangson I hear what both sides are saying here. My American Politics teacher was an avid Ayn Rand fan, but even he admits that she was not everyone's cup of tea. The way he explained it to me is that her books appeal to the young and open-minded who have optimist hopes for the ability to change ones environment, but turn-off the older generation who are already cynical and complacent with the 'unfair' life, because they feel no matter what they do, nothing will ever change. In other words, they see it as wild pipe-dreams that aren't even interesting. I think that could be a key-factor in say, Atlas Shrugged, not making the cut. The writers were looking for books that could be read by any person of any age, and when they put it down, could say: That was a good book! Ayn Rand isn't going to do that for everybody.

SandraML
SandraML

Working my way through the list...definitely on my Reading To Do List to read all 100.  Some I agree with; some not so much.  However, none so far have been a waste of time--and I've learned from all of them.  Puzzled over The Painted Bird by Jerzy Kosinski however, especially with all the controversy surrounding the writing of the novel itself.  Found myself actually laughing at all the horror...I found it way over the top and as such, comical.  Not, I believe, the reaction Mr. Kosinski had in mind.

jellybear_350
jellybear_350

i think that it is really cool that people still read the older books because alot of people these days are mostly into the blood and gore and horror and romance i think that the people that still readf the older books are smart because alot of the older books are actually really good i know that some people think that the older books would be boring but in actual fact the older books are probablly the most interesting books out there because you can learn about what different countries were like in the past so for those who read older boks good job.

blissfully20
blissfully20

This list is much like a dream to-read-list for the next 2 years. Awesome work!!

jellybear_350
jellybear_350

jellybear_350

i absolutelly agree with you

\